Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Jonathan Blow can't into LLVM

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 6:05

https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/551676327368355840
https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/551584748892848128
https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/551584226571984896
Long story short: He started working on a compiler that uses a mutable register model for its IR, and now he's mad that LLVM's SSA model doesn't cleanly map to what he happened to be doing.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 6:13

This guy?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Blow
Seems like a useless waste of flesh

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 7:16

>>2
he made braid, one of the greatest indie games ever.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 7:18

Trivial to fix.

so fix it?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 7:23

Due to SSA form, if %x is set to 5 you can't set it to something else later. Thus everywhere that you use %x you might as well just directly use 5 there instead

wow why is he bitching about this. the .ll format doesn't let you assign constants.

All he has to do is invent a new file format called .llc which is exactly the same as .ll except allows assigning constants. Then write a compiler that turns llc into ll by substituting the constants everywhere. That would take under a week.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 7:28

x = 5
y = x + 1
z = x * y


becomes

y = 5 + 1
z = 5 * y


the reason llvm doesn't do this is "register pressure". It's normally doing JIT on these files, constant propagation like this would require two passes or waste registers.

I doubt anyone on "twitter" has been able to look away from their "microblogging feed" for long enough to realize that. Instead they're just giving him vaugaries like "it's going against the grain". What insufferable fucks.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 7:59

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 8:38

>>3
If it was so great I would have heard of it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 8:40

>>7
Don't bully him, he looks cute.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 8:48

>>8
Hey, I've heard of it. It was a good game, I played it.

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI 2015-01-05 12:22

First mistake: using LLVM.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 12:35

>>11
And you, of course, know something better?

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI 2015-01-05 14:30

>>12
Write your own compiler, obviously.

"If you want things done right, you have to do it yourself."

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 16:27

>>13
But realistically, you shouldn't be writing compilers if you're a serious programmer, because compilers are a waste of time. Right?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 20:58

>>14
Why are you asking him?
Writing compilers can be a valuable exercise if nothing else.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 0:55

>>11
As opposed to what? LLVM is fine for its intended purpose (do we really need to reinvent the wheel for every register machine architecture in existence?)

The real mistake is not knowing what your generated input is supposed to look like. 10 seconds on Wikipedia could have told him this, followed by a few minutes' thought to decide whether it's worth it to generate said input or use something else instead.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 2:56

Cudder is all talk and no action

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 6:00

>>17
Please cease and desist your defamation campaign.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 8:12

>>18
I'm with >>17, Cudder would rather jerk off and have sex with his blow up doll than do anything constructive (not that this project is particularly constructive)

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 9:37

>>13
NIH-syndrome is your disease, Cudder.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 10:19

>>20
Cudder suffers from perfectionism. The rest of us use other people's general purpose library with minimal regard to the unused features (Cudder calls this bloat).

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 10:37

>>21
Different sorts of shit.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 11:35

>>13
And live on top of all this intel crud? No thank you.

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI 2015-01-07 13:12

>>16
All ISAs are different. Trying to treat them all as the same is part of why COMPILERS ARE SO FUCKING RETARDED.
(See http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1359605422 ).

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 15:45

>>24
All ISAs are different yes, but there's a lot more to a compiler than just code generation. Much of the high level logic can be made totally ISA independent. Having a common IR just falls out of that naturally.

If you have specific criticisms of LLVM's IR (and there are valid ones - it's too low level for code generators for exotic VLIW architectures to easily use, for one) I'd be interested to hear them.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 15:57

>>25
Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 16:00

>>26
Which you or anyone has yet to demonstrate.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 16:35

>>27
You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of common sense.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 16:55

>>28
Come on, that's like saying "proof is in the bible."

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 16:58

>>29
Well, it IS Christmas today.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 21:36

>>29
that's like saying "oh wow carl sagan science is so awesome huhuhu pretty stars fuck bible"

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 22:10

>>31
No it's like saying "put up or shut up."

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 23:33

>>32
"2 + 2 = 4 isn't self-evident to me and i need physical evidence for it because materialism empiricism hurr durr"

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 0:34

>>33
You got your disciplines all fucked up. But I'll take physical evidence if you've got it (you don't.)

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 1:12

>>34
Simpleton.

Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence. Specific criticisms aren't necessary when the basic underlying principle is wrong. You can demonstrate it yourself in your own mind if you have an ounce of intelligence.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 1:57

>>35
Who is this douchebag?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 1:57

If you use LLVM you're not writing a compiler

you're just making a new parser and syntax for LLVM, all the compilation is done by LLVM: You are just a baby using prepackaged tool because you're too stupid to implement a real compiler yourself. At best what he's doing is transpiling.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 2:23

>>35
A chocolate box can only have chocolates in it. It is very easy to know what you are going to get from it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 2:39

>>38
A chocolate box can only have chocolates in it.
False.
It is very easy to know what you are going to get from it.
It is very easy to assume what you are going to get from it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 3:04

>>38
This.
Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot. Anybody who disagrees is an idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 3:39

>>39
It would not be a chocolate box if it did not have chocolates in it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 4:49

YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT
CHOCOLATES
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES NOT JUST CHOCOLATE
DARK OR WHITE CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES ETC
WHEN YOU GIVE OR RECEIVE ONE BUT YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT AND YOUR MOM ONLY FEEDS YOU HOTPOCKETS
ALL HOTPOCKETS ARE THE SAME THOUGH

IF YOU DISAGREE YOURE AN ATHEIST AND ENJOY HELL ROFL BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN
YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT
CHOCOLATES
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES NOT JUST CHOCOLATE
DARK OR WHITE CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES ETC
WHEN YOU GIVE OR RECEIVE ONE BUT YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT AND YOUR MOM ONLY FEEDS YOU HOTPOCKETS
ALL HOTPOCKETS ARE THE SAME THOUGH

IF YOU DISAGREE YOURE AN ATHEIST AND ENJOY HELL ROFL BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN
YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT
CHOCOLATES
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES NOT JUST CHOCOLATE
DARK OR WHITE CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES ETC
WHEN YOU GIVE OR RECEIVE ONE BUT YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT AND YOUR MOM ONLY FEEDS YOU HOTPOCKETS
ALL HOTPOCKETS ARE THE SAME THOUGH

IF YOU DISAGREE YOURE AN ATHEIST AND ENJOY HELL ROFL BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN
YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT
CHOCOLATES
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES NOT JUST CHOCOLATE
DARK OR WHITE CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES ETC
WHEN YOU GIVE OR RECEIVE ONE BUT YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT AND YOUR MOM ONLY FEEDS YOU HOTPOCKETS
ALL HOTPOCKETS ARE THE SAME THOUGH

IF YOU DISAGREE YOURE AN ATHEIST AND ENJOY HELL ROFL BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN
YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT
CHOCOLATES
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES NOT JUST CHOCOLATE
DARK OR WHITE CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES ETC
WHEN YOU GIVE OR RECEIVE ONE BUT YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT AND YOUR MOM ONLY FEEDS YOU HOTPOCKETS
ALL HOTPOCKETS ARE THE SAME THOUGH

IF YOU DISAGREE YOURE AN ATHEIST AND ENJOY HELL ROFL BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN
YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT
CHOCOLATES
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES NOT JUST CHOCOLATE
DARK OR WHITE CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES ETC
WHEN YOU GIVE OR RECEIVE ONE BUT YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT AND YOUR MOM ONLY FEEDS YOU HOTPOCKETS
ALL HOTPOCKETS ARE THE SAME THOUGH

IF YOU DISAGREE YOURE AN ATHEIST AND ENJOY HELL ROFL BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN
YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT
CHOCOLATES
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES NOT JUST CHOCOLATE
DARK OR WHITE CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES ETC
WHEN YOU GIVE OR RECEIVE ONE BUT YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT AND YOUR MOM ONLY FEEDS YOU HOTPOCKETS
ALL HOTPOCKETS ARE THE SAME THOUGH

IF YOU DISAGREE YOURE AN ATHEIST AND ENJOY HELL ROFL BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN
YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT
CHOCOLATES
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES NOT JUST CHOCOLATE
DARK OR WHITE CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES ETC
WHEN YOU GIVE OR RECEIVE ONE BUT YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT AND YOUR MOM ONLY FEEDS YOU HOTPOCKETS
ALL HOTPOCKETS ARE THE SAME THOUGH

IF YOU DISAGREE YOURE AN ATHEIST AND ENJOY HELL ROFL BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN
YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT
CHOCOLATES
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES NOT JUST CHOCOLATE
DARK OR WHITE CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES ETC
WHEN YOU GIVE OR RECEIVE ONE BUT YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT AND YOUR MOM ONLY FEEDS YOU HOTPOCKETS
ALL HOTPOCKETS ARE THE SAME THOUGH

IF YOU DISAGREE YOURE AN ATHEIST AND ENJOY HELL ROFL BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN
YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT
CHOCOLATES
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES NOT JUST CHOCOLATE
DARK OR WHITE CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES ETC
WHEN YOU GIVE OR RECEIVE ONE BUT YOU ARE AUTISTIC AND LIVE IN YOUR BASEMENT AND YOUR MOM ONLY FEEDS YOU HOTPOCKETS
ALL HOTPOCKETS ARE THE SAME THOUGH

IF YOU DISAGREE YOURE AN ATHEIST AND ENJOY HELL ROFL BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 4:53

A BOX OF CHOCOLATES CONTAINS CHOCOLATES.
I'M NOT BUTTHURT AT ALL.
CAPS AND BOLD ARE CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL AND WINNING AN ARGUMENT.
A BOX OF CHOCOLATES CONTAINS CHOCOLATES.
I'M NOT BUTTHURT AT ALL.
CAPS AND BOLD ARE CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL AND WINNING AN ARGUMENT.
A BOX OF CHOCOLATES CONTAINS CHOCOLATES.
I'M NOT BUTTHURT AT ALL.
CAPS AND BOLD ARE CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL AND WINNING AN ARGUMENT.
A BOX OF CHOCOLATES CONTAINS CHOCOLATES.
I'M NOT BUTTHURT AT ALL.
CAPS AND BOLD ARE CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL AND WINNING AN ARGUMENT.
A BOX OF CHOCOLATES CONTAINS CHOCOLATES.
I'M NOT BUTTHURT AT ALL.
CAPS AND BOLD ARE CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL AND WINNING AN ARGUMENT.
A BOX OF CHOCOLATES CONTAINS CHOCOLATES.
I'M NOT BUTTHURT AT ALL.
CAPS AND BOLD ARE CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL AND WINNING AN ARGUMENT.
A BOX OF CHOCOLATES CONTAINS CHOCOLATES.
I'M NOT BUTTHURT AT ALL.
CAPS AND BOLD ARE CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL AND WINNING AN ARGUMENT.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 4:55

If you use LLVM you're not writing a compiler

you're just making a new parser and syntax for LLVM, all the compilation is done by LLVM: You are just a baby using prepackaged tool because you're too stupid to implement a real compiler yourself. At best what he's doing is transpiling.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 5:14

>>43
MAMA DON'T LIKE AUTISTS

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 5:45

A chocolate box denotes picking an item out of a group of identical items. Same with all english 'a's

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 6:12

>>46
We are talking about real life, not linguistics. Real life means a box of all sorts of different chocolates and you know what I mean you stupid nigger atheist autist. You'll never objectively prove me wrong as real life physical and spiritual social situations of humans giving each other boxes of chocolates which contain all sort of different chocolates and they don't know what they are gonna get. they could get all truffles or truffles and other kinds of chocolates together or this or that.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 6:13

Nice groupthink going against me.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 8:45

>>48
get back to work Jonathan

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-08 19:13

>>42
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES ARE STILL CHOCOLATES.
CATHOLICISM: THE MOST POPULAR HERESY SINCE 1054.
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES ARE STILL CHOCOLATES.
CATHOLICISM: THE MOST POPULAR HERESY SINCE 1054.
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES ARE STILL CHOCOLATES.
CATHOLICISM: THE MOST POPULAR HERESY SINCE 1054.
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES ARE STILL CHOCOLATES.
CATHOLICISM: THE MOST POPULAR HERESY SINCE 1054.
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES ARE STILL CHOCOLATES.
CATHOLICISM: THE MOST POPULAR HERESY SINCE 1054.
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES ARE STILL CHOCOLATES.
CATHOLICISM: THE MOST POPULAR HERESY SINCE 1054.
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES ARE STILL CHOCOLATES.
CATHOLICISM: THE MOST POPULAR HERESY SINCE 1054.
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES ARE STILL CHOCOLATES.
CATHOLICISM: THE MOST POPULAR HERESY SINCE 1054.
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES ARE STILL CHOCOLATES.
CATHOLICISM: THE MOST POPULAR HERESY SINCE 1054.
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES ARE STILL CHOCOLATES.
CATHOLICISM: THE MOST POPULAR HERESY SINCE 1054.
DIFFERENT TYPE OF CHOCOLATES ARE STILL CHOCOLATES.
CATHOLICISM: THE MOST POPULAR HERESY SINCE 1054.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-09 19:07

An ISIS Christmas

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-09 19:27

>>51
But ISIS have long disbanded. Aaron Harris does Sumac and Mammifer now, Aaron Turner does Palms, etc.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List