S-100

When I was young, my friends all worked like fools to get their share
Of an S-100 system, like an IMSAI or Altair;
Well the S-100's still around, I'm very glad to say
But friends, I'm here to tell you that it's not the same today.

And it's cheer up, my lads, let your hearts never fuss
When you're integrating systems for the S-100 bus.

To tell the truth, the source of all our troubles seems to be
A committee on computers of the I of triple E;
They settled on a standard spec, 696 by name
Now everything is standardized, but nothing works the same.

They say the 80 boards are way too slow - it's enough to give you fits
If the 09 isn't fast enough, then go to 16 bits.
68 and z8000 and an 86 as well,
And code compatibility goes straight to bloody hell

Then add a board for the modem line and one for every port
and a printer board and a keyboard board, and as a last resort
For every problem we will add a board that has the cure,
It's not too damned efficient, but it's a mother, that's for sure.

And when it's all assembled there's computer to your collar,
It's nice to have a micro but a mainframe would be smaller.
And when they turn the power on, it's sure to dim the lamps
With plus or minus sixteen volts and fourteen hundred amps.

I enjoyed this OP, thanks.

I doubt more than 3 people on this site have ever actually worked with the S-100.

Now that we're all here: lets discuss it.

The first computer I ever used was a 386.
Boy, am I old or what?

>>4
I think that was first computer I ever used too. I don't remember, I think it ran Windows 3.1 or 95 or something.

Thanks to N8VEM and the fact that a lot of old micros can still be found in working or easily refurbishable order, I've still experienced working with the S-100 bus

Pretty sure the first computer I used was Win3.1 or maybe 95. But the first thing I actually programmed on was a Commodore VIC-20.

>>6
Windows isn't a computer.