Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Muh heuristics

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-19 6:36

This expression indicates a programmer confusion and lack of understanding.
When confronted with something they can not understand nor analyze, programmers
mumble, ``Muh heuristics'' or "muh heuristic, u faget XD". This is usually followed by
anus haxing and rectum bleeding.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-19 7:09

muh dependent types

This expression indicates a haskell programmers confusion and lack of understanding.
When confronted with something they can not shoehorn into the type system, programmers
mumble, ``Muh dependent types''. This is usually followed by intimidation and links to summer school courses.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-19 7:31

muh feynman

This expression indicates a physicist's confusion and lack of understanding.
When confronted with something they can not understand nor comprehend with physical intuition, physicists
mumble, ``muh feynman'' or ``muh calculations''. This is usually followed by quoting richard feynman and pulling out a calculator.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-19 10:06

muh muh

This expression indicates a progrider's confusion and lack of understanding.
When confronted with something they can not understand nor hax in the anus, progriders
mumble, ``muh muh''. This is usually followed by running to their mommy.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-19 10:16

muh muh
*runs to mommy*

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-19 13:10

muh Zhivago

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-19 18:49

>>4,5
I chuckled audibly.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-19 18:56

>>7
you have the sense of humor of a 10 yo

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-19 19:21

>>8
puns have a special place in my heart. even these. what can I say?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-19 21:37

>>9
“I'm sorry”?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-20 0:01

>>10
I'm not sorry, so I wont say it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-20 14:34

>>11
I'm [...] sorry
Good enough.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-23 20:45

>>2
But dependent types really are the future of programming. In a decade, not having dependent types will be the mark of a toy language.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-23 21:01

>>7,9
I agree. It was not a bad pun.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-24 1:57

>>14
I actually think it's pretty funny.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-24 2:12

Ok Timmy. Throw me back the ball now.

I can't.

Why?

I need to prove I can lift my arm first.

Isn't it obvious?

I'm working on the case where a tornado might form in a matter of seconds and toss a car at me. I wont be able to lift my arm if I'm crushed. I need to determine that wont happen first before I throw the ball.

What do you mean-- **flooooooo-- flushh!! WHAMMMKRRKRKRKRKRKERRkk**

Timmy?

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List