A.I.

Why is it that we don't see any groundbreaking development on the field of A.I., but people continue saying we should be scared and whatnot? And it's not the usual crackpots, it's actually people who supposedly know better. I'm confused.

http://www.bbc.com/news/31047780
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/dec/02/stephen-hawking-intel-communication-system-astrophysicist-software-predictive-text-type
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/27/elon-musk-artificial-intelligence-ai-biggest-existential-threat

>>56

Atheism is false.

Your entire post is false and atheistic.

Humans are constrained by their biology

Baseless nonsensical, non-scientific statement.

and natural evolution is blind.

Baseless nonsensical, non-scientific statement. There is no such thing as the term ``natural evolution'' in any official scientific use.

Self-improving AGIs would be free of such constraints.

Baseless nonsensical, non-scientific concept. Baseless nonsensical, non-scientific statement.

More baseless nonsensical, non-scientific statements following.

>>57
Yours is false too.

>>55
Baseless nonsensical, non-scientific post.

>>60
Baseless nonsensical, non-scientific post.