Writing for the unanimous panel, Judge Sandra Sgroi stated that “given the now widespread use of email as a form of written communication in both personal and business affairs, it would be unreasonable to conclude that email messages are incapable of conforming to the criteria of CPLR 2104 simply because they cannot be physically signed in a traditional fashion.”
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-21 16:22
Writing for the unanimous panel, Judge Sandra Sgroi stated that “given the now widespread use of Twitter as a form of written communication in both personal and business affairs, it would be unreasonable to conclude that tweets are incapable of conforming to the criteria of CPLR 2104 simply because they cannot be physically signed in a traditional fashion.”
Writing for the unanimous panel, Judge Sandra Sgroi stated that “given the now widespread use of Reddit as a form of written communication in both personal and business affairs, it would be unreasonable to conclude that Reddit posts are incapable of conforming to the criteria of CPLR 2104 simply because they cannot be physically signed in a traditional fashion.”
Writing for the unanimous panel, Judge Sandra Sgroi stated that “given the now widespread use of Youtube as a form of written communication in both personal and business affairs, it would be unreasonable to conclude that Youtube videos are incapable of conforming to the criteria of CPLR 2104 simply because they cannot be physically signed in a traditional fashion.”
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-21 16:24
What the hell kind of a name is "Sgroi", anyway? "Sgroi" is something you would gasp if someone kicked you in the groin, not a name.
She is not real.
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-21 16:26
>>3 As are all the other Cthulhians. No need to ignore them because of it. It is perfectly normal for Cthulhians to run the modern judicial system.
“As much as communication originally written or typed on paper, an e-mail retrievable from computer storage” is proof of a deal, according to the court’s opinion, which was written by Associate Justice David Friedman.
I'm going to start an email service. As soon as I have 100 users, I'll put in a forged correspondence with each of them where they agreed to pay $1000 after subscribing. And sue all of them.
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-21 23:42
vérifiez-les
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-22 0:48
>>10 Yeah that won't look crazy suspicious. 100 users suddenly being sued because they all allegedly agreed to the same thing but deny having any knowledge of it.
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-22 2:26
>>12 What are you talking about? I have their signatures right here in the return address.