Name: littlefaggot 2015-04-07 21:54
u all haskal wiazrds have idealistic view over your language; i must admit that haskal's tpye system is beautiful, almost perfect, yet the rest of the language is still completely unpragmatic: even with the thousands of packages in hackage and urs dsl things.
take the examlpe of string processing (the most common task in a programmer life): even EXPERT haskal programmers get buttfuck'd with that; and regex in haskal are almost useless shiet... if you compare it with Clojure (or even CL) you will feel like an idiot for trying to solve a simple problems with haskal only coz is cute :p
sometimes i find problems were haskal is good, and i finish writing very much elegant and sofisticated code, but i will never be able to use it for a real life project, and that's sad
an now i read that you want to go deeper with this homotopy type theory thing, and create more and more abstraction, but for what? what's your goal?
thank you.
take the examlpe of string processing (the most common task in a programmer life): even EXPERT haskal programmers get buttfuck'd with that; and regex in haskal are almost useless shiet... if you compare it with Clojure (or even CL) you will feel like an idiot for trying to solve a simple problems with haskal only coz is cute :p
sometimes i find problems were haskal is good, and i finish writing very much elegant and sofisticated code, but i will never be able to use it for a real life project, and that's sad
an now i read that you want to go deeper with this homotopy type theory thing, and create more and more abstraction, but for what? what's your goal?
thank you.