Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Chrome or Firefox

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-17 23:06

Which browser does /prog/ prefer?

Name: del 2015-04-17 23:09

del

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-17 23:20

internet explorer

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-17 23:35

Firefox.
Chrome is terrible and steals your information!

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-18 0:23

傲游

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-18 1:42

Firefox compromised its principles and started include DRM just to struggle to retain market share
Firefox includes ads on the front page and "health reporting" by defaults
it is a bad browser by bad people.

it is very sad that the only alternative, Chromium, is worse.. since it automatically updates/removes your extensions without asking you

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-18 2:51

>>5
Why?
Why do people use obscure browsers like this?

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-18 2:56

I'm trying out Xombrero, which is a lighter-weight security oriented browser built on top of WebKit and GTK2, provides basic mouse interface, but also a vi/vim like interface so you can do everything with the keyboard, including running shell scripts within the browser, making things like youtube-dl a lot easier. It's recommended on the suckless rocks page.

I'm having some problems with the font colors, hard to see what's in the address bar, but I don't think I have everything configured properly, so can't weigh in on a verdict yet. This is on a fresh Gentoo install, don't have all of my fonts and shit installed, or X and GTK configured, just using defaults.

If I can work out the problems, I'll probably stick with it because the alternatives are shit. For adblocking, I'm going to use adsuck.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-18 3:31

Seamonkey.

>>8
Thanks for reminding me of this project, I used it on Openbsd briefly and it was nice.

The project is a little bit dead now though.

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2015-04-18 3:48

IE6

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-18 3:58

Dubs

Name: !balls 2015-04-18 4:07

I use Firefox. At one point I had disabled all Javascript, CSS and images, but now I just use Noscript.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-18 14:27

Using a web browser from an evil Big Brother corporation? Hell no, it's probably loaded with spyware and sends my credit card numbers to Google Jews.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-18 14:31

>>9
Yeah, hasn't had much work done to it in the last year. I managed to fix my problems with the fonts and shit, just had to configure the default style sheets.

I'm going to try surf next, the official suckless WebKit/Gtk browser.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-18 14:56

Surf is really pointless. In the end, you are still just using Webkit.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-18 15:26

webkit is terrible

i wish it worked then i'd use it.

what i wanted was a chromium equivalent of surf, the problem is that still wouldn't be good because it requires a supercomputer to build

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-19 16:56

>>16
Not really. I've built it from source on a ThinkPad T520 running FreeBSD before, it took around an hour and a half. You just need semi-modern hardware from this decade.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-19 17:34

>>17
thats bullshit you need like 8GB of RAM

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-19 18:08

>>18
My T520 has 8GB of RAM.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-19 18:16

buy 4GB of RAM to save money
wonder why their quadcores are slow&swap all the time.
get 16GB at least and if you have a deal 32GB. Then set a ramdisk and disable swapping. Put the files you use in the ramdisk and make it sync to SSD each N hours.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-19 18:21

>>20
Epic fake quotation meme /g/ro xD

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-19 18:25

Dubs Explorer 8

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-19 18:47

>>20
RAM is cheap now, but just wait until after September.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-20 4:37

>>23
What's in September?

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-20 5:10

>>24
I don't know, but wake me up when September ends.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-22 11:34

Do any of you memesters browse here using lynx or similar?

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-22 12:36

>>26
I tried but there's an extra input form you have to fill out, and it makes it impossible to post. I think it's there to stop bots dead in their tracks.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-22 15:35

AOL

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-22 16:40

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-22 20:54

>>29
For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List