๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ good shit goเฑฆิ sHit๐ thats โ some good๐๐shit right๐๐there๐๐๐ rightโthere โโif i do Saาฏ so my self ๐ฏ i say so ๐ฏ thats what im talking about right there right there (chorus: สณIแตสฐแต แตสฐแตสณแต) mMMMMmะ๐ฏ ๐๐ ๐ะO0ะเฌ OOOOOะเฌ เฌ Ooooแตแตแตแตแตแตแตแตแต ๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐ฏ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐๐Good shit
Name:
Anonymous2015-11-15 20:44
>>321 Nice strictly decreasing GET, but you should check my dubs.
โ๐ปโโ๏ธโWhat โ tHe FUCK๐ก๐ ๐ก๐ did ๐๐ปyouโ justโ fuckingโ say๐ข๐ข ๐out me๐ก๐ก, you little bitchโ๏ธโ๏ธ?โ โโIโll ๐ have you know๐ซ I ๐graduated๐ ๐ ๐๐ top ๐ฏ of my๐ฏ๐ass๐ in the Navy๐ท Seals๐ท๐ท, and Iโve been involved in numerous secret๐ค raids ๐ซ๐ซ on Al-Quaeda๐ณ๐ณ๐ณ๐ณ, and I have over 300๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ confirmed kills๐ต. I am trained in ๐๐gorilla๐ warfare๐ฃ and Iโm the topโฌโฌ sniper๐ซ in๐ซ the๐ซ entire ๐บ๐ธUS๐บ๐ธarmed๐บ๐ธforces๐บ๐ธ. You are โโโ nothingโ to me but just another target๐ฏ. I ๐ก๐ ๐ก๐ will wipe you the fuck out with precision๐ฏ๐ฏ the likes of which has โnever been seen๐ ๐๐ ๐ before on this Earth๐, mark๐ my๐ fucking๐ words๐. You think ๐ค๐ญ you can get away with saying that ๐ฉshit to me over the Internet๐ป๐๐ป๐๐ป๐๐ป๐? Think again, fucker.๐ก As we speak I am contacting my secret๐ค ๐ค ๐ค network of ๐ตspies๐ต across the ๐บ๐ธU๐บ๐ธS๐บ๐ธA๐บ๐ธ and your ๐ป๐IP๐ป๐ is being traced ๐ป๐right now so you๐ก better prepare for the ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉstorm, maggot. ๐ก The โโ storm ๐ง โ ๐ฉ that wipes out the ๐น๐นpathetic little thing you call your life. Youโre โฐโฐ fucking ๐deadโ โ โ โ โ โ , kid. I can be ๐ anywhere๐, anytime โฐ, and I can killโ โ you in over seven hundred ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ ways, and thatโs just with my๐๐ bare hands๐๐๐ช๐ช๐. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed๐ซ๐ซโ ๐ซ๐ช๐ซ๐ฃ๐ซ combat, but I have access to the ๐ซ๐ซentire๐ฃ arsenal๐ฃ of the ๐บ๐ธUnited๐บ๐ธStates๐บ๐ธMarine๐บ๐ธCorps๐บ๐ธ and I willโ๏ธโ๏ธ use it to its full โ๏ธextent to wipe your miser๐le ass๐ค off the face๐ of the ๐continent๐, you ๐ฉlittle shit๐ฉ๐ฉ If only you could have known what unholy โ๐ซโช๐ซ๐๐ซโธ๐ซ๐ฏ๐ซโฏ๏ธ๐ซ retribution your little โ๐everโ comment was ๐out to bring ๐down ๐upon you, maybe you would have held๐ your fucking๐ ๐ tongue๐ ๐ ๐ . But you couldnโtโ, you didnโtโ, and nowโ๏ธโ๏ธ youโre paying๐ฒ the ๐ธprice๐ฐ๐ฐ, you goddamn idiot. ๐ข I will ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉshit๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ ๐ก๐ ๐พfury๐ก๐ ๐พ๐ก๐ ๐พ all over you ๐ก๐ ๐พ and you will โโdrown in it โโ. โ โ โ โ Youโre โ โ โ โ fucking โ โ โ โ dead, โ โ โ โ kiddo.โ โ โ โ
C# identifiers can include Unicode escape sequences (\u1234 etc) C# identifiers can include Unicode characters in the category โOther, formattingโ (Cf) but these are ignored when comparing identifiers for equality The Mongolian Vowel Separator (U+180E) has oscillated between the Cand Zs categories a couple of times
When discussing this, Vladimir Reshetnikov mentioned the Mongolian Vowel Separator (U+180E) which has had an interesting life. It was introduced in Unicode 3.0.0, when it was in the Cf category (โother, formattingโ). Then in Unicode 4.0.0 it was moved into the Zs (separator, space) category. In Unicode 6.3.0 it was then moved back to the Cf category.
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-22 17:59
>>348 That's what you get when some retard thinks you should allow characters outside A-Za-z0-9_ in identifiers-
I left that post incomplete because I realized any character can be part of a symbol in most Lisps, and I'm not going to criticize Lisp.
C# identifiers can include Unicode characters in the category โOther, formattingโ (Cf) but these are ignored when comparing identifiers for equality
Looks like C# is at fault here for trying to be smart and actually being retarded.
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-22 19:04
>>349 I started raging at you for not even including the #\- character as a possibility in symbol names, but I'm not going to criticize not criticizing Lisp.
>>352 Fuck off weeaboo. In the real world, everybody from any country should be able to read, understand, modify, write, call and integrate code, which requires typing things in an alphabet known to every single programmer in the world. It happens to be latin because it's by far the most popular alphabet out of the simple, non-insane/autistic/retarded/hieroglyph alphabets.
These characters are currently under ISO ballot for inclusion in ISO/IEC 10646:2016 (5th ed.) (see WG2 N4705 pages 130, 131, 135, and 137โ138). Most of the 8,514 characters in this document will feed into Unicode version 10.0 in June 2017, but if national bodies have no objection to the emoji characters in the current CD ballot which closes 29 February 2016, then it is very likely that the Unicode Techinal Committee (UTC) will fast-track most or all of these 74 emoji into Unicode 9.0. None of these characters are particularly contentious or controversial, and I do not see any reason why they should not all be included in Unicode 9.0, but the final decision will not be made until the UTC meets in early May 2016.
