>>1 It's worse than you think man. SJWs complained to Apple about their emoji font not being diverse enough, so they added all of this multicultural variation shit for each glyph, with like 16 shades of skin color for each smiley face controlled by a variation selector prefix codepoint.
It's a fucking nightmare. I had to deal with this shit at work. And since they're colored glyphs, it fucks up your usual algorithms for LCD sub-sampled rendering you typically use, so you've got to add these separate codepaths just for caching the glyphs in textures, and so on and so forth.
Most of the emoji are above the Basic Multilingual Plane (have codepoints requiring more than 16-bits). So if you force your programs to only accept BMP code planes or UCS-2 characters, force FreeType into UCS-2 mode, etc. you can stop emoji from infecting your program.
From the symbol of Mercury (U+263F ☿). This symbol is used to indicate a virgin female (for example, in genetic analysis). Also used in botany to indicate flower with both male and female reproductive organs. The Mercury symbol has also been increasingly claimed by non-binary transgender people for their use, being a gender symbol available in Unicode on most computers. From the female and male symbols (U+26A5 ⚥). Intersex or transgender. Another transgender symbol, a combination of the male and female sign with a third, combined arm representing non-binary transgender people (Unicode: U+26A7 ⚧). ⚢ (U+26A2): Double female sign, sometimes used as a female homosexual symbol ⚣ (U+26A3): Double male sign, sometimes used as a male homosexual symbol ⚦ (U+26A6): Male with stroke sign, used as a symbol for transgender. ⚨ (U+26A8): Vertical male with stroke sign. It means ‘other’ gender. ⚩ (U+26A9): Horizontal male with stroke sign. It also means ‘other’ gender. ⚪ (U+26AA): Medium white circle base, used as a symbol for asexuality, sexless or genderless ⚲ (U+26B2): Neuter. This is in fact the shape of the original (medieval) "Venus" symbol (depicting a hand mirror), the additional horizontal bar being of modern date.
I still feel bad for >>4-san. Usually, Apple's API are bearable.
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-02 17:27
Wait, so >>4 wasn't a joke, but the sad reality of the Western society? Holy fuuuuuuck you people are emasculated faggots.
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-02 17:29
The most widely represented race is caucasian, critics say, while "minorities" are grossly underrepresented.
The White race is the minority. How much indoctrinated and brainwashed can you fucking get to believe that the minority (less than 500 million people out of 7 billion) is somehow the majority?
They also define a custom ordering of emoji, right before arguing that nobody will ever actually need it. Yeah, this was written by Google and Apple alright. Somebody is trying to justify his paycheck.
Paige Tutt is a writer who covers race negro covers race
Didn't read.
>>54 Race is biological reality, not a social construct.
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-16 11:24
>>55 social darwinism is also biological reality. But there is a human reality, where race is just a label to stereotype people.
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-16 11:38
>>56 Then why does the NBA almost exclusively consist of blacks? Why are all the running disciplines at the Olympics won by blacks? Is it because of "labels" or because blacks are biologically better adapted to running and playing basketball?
>>58 Yes, intense training and dedication, added to natural variance inside the race can allow some whites to match blacks' abilities. But that has no effect on the averages and does not make race any less of a reality. Race has impact on a lot more things than the color of the skin. For example, blacks also have, on average longer fingers than whites.
You people argue over such pointless things. It is the opinion of modern anthropology that race is a social construct. Do you, a bunch of shitposters, seriously think you know more about the topic than an anthropologist?
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-16 13:39
By the 1970s, it had become clear that (1) most human differences were cultural; (2) what was not cultural was principally polymorphic – that is to say, found in diverse groups of people at different frequencies; (3) what was not cultural or polymorphic was principally clinal – that is to say, gradually variable over geography; and (4) what was left – the component of human diversity that was not cultural, polymorphic, or clinal – was very small.
A consensus consequently developed among anthropologists and geneticists that race as the previous generation had known it – as largely discrete, geographically distinct, gene pools – did not exist.
The report The Color of Crime (2005, second expanded edition) by the New Century Foundation states that while the official crime statistics show large racial differences in the United States, there are several problems which tend to cause underestimation of the racial differences. One example being "Whites" sometimes including Hispanics. Another is not adjusting for that the different racial groups differ in population size. The report reviews the more accurate statistics that is available and describes many large differences in crime rates between races. The report also examines the research on possible bias against racial minorities in the justice system and the police and concludes that bias not a significant explanation for the different racial crime rates.[3]
It major findings were stated as:[3]
Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery. When Blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-Blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife. Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the White rate. The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is Black and Hispanic. Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving Blacks and Whites, Blacks commit 85 percent and Whites commit 15 percent. Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are Black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When Whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are Black. Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a White than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery. Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa. Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white. Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely. Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million. Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than Whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.
economic conditions explain the difference with white crime rates
This only means that blacks are more prone to being poor. Perhaps they choose a life of poverty in order to do crime all the time. Irrelevant to the question, at any rate.
when it comes to everyday threats to personal well-being, whites far and away lead the pack in all kinds of destructive behaviors: corporate pollution, consumer fraud, violations of health
Oh, so getting a diarrhea from polluted water or getting ripped off in a car deal are somehow worse threats than getting stabbed in the street or having your wife raped and performing an abortion as a result? This is just plain and misleading bullshit. Also, corporations and states are institutions, not people. They follow different decision-making procedures. Who's to say that the corporation polluting your town isn't black-owned? Then there are black factory workers and black soldiers killing people. By the way, black soldiers don't mean that blacks are more prone to kill people, but neither do white soldiers. It's a different process of making decisions and policies, a collective one rather than personal.
The next arguments from Tim Wise are self-contradictory:
meaning that whites were victimized by blacks less often than would have been expected by random chance, given the extent to which whites were available to be victimized Because of ongoing racial isolation and de facto segregation, the two group’s members do not encounter one another at rates commensurate with their shares of the population
If there is racial isolation, then why are whites "more available" to be victimized? And vice versa, if whites are more widely available as victims, then what "racial isolation and de facto segregation" is he talking about? Bullshit.
the odds of a given white person (or white criminal for that matter) encountering a black person are only about three percent
More bullshit. With the modern diversity policies and "inclusion", blacks are everywhere, from offices to colleges to recreational spaces and all streets in all towns. The odds of meeting a black person simply cannot be as low as 3%, that would require all blacks to live in ghettoes and never leave them.
In 2002, blacks committed a little more than 1.2 million violent crimes, while whites committed a little more than three million violent crimes
So if there are about 8 times more whites than blacks, why do whites commit only 2.5 more violent crimes? You can't bullshit us, Tim Wise: blacks are far more prone to commit violent crimes.
Criminologists estimate that seventy percent of all crimes are committed by just seven percent of the offenders (12): a small bunch of repeat offenders who commit the vast majority of crimes. Since blacks committed roughly 1.2 million violent crimes in 2002, if seventy percent of these were committed by seven percent of the black offenders
This is more diversity bullshit. If 70% of crimes are committed by 7% of offenders, that doesn't mean those 7% are evenly distributed by race. As follows from the data, blacks are several times more wont to commit violent crimes. Thus, those 7% might have all been black, which would mean that the rate of repeated offenders within the black population would be higher. Tim Wise makes nothing to account this possible inaccuracy.
this means that whites are 4.7 times more likely to be victimized by another white person than by a black person
Which is less than the 8:1 population ratio, thus supporting the fact that blacks are more prone to committing violent crimes than whites.
If, as the Justice Department data suggests, blacks commit somewhere between 25-30 percent of violent crime in most years (23 percent in 2002), to profile blacks for crime will result in police being wrong, between 70-75 percent of the time
Another nonsensical outburst from Tim Wise. Profiling blacks means focusing more efforts on them, not ignoring crimes committed by other racial groups. And seeing that the relative crime rates are higher among blacks (yes, 25-30 percent is higher than the 10-15 percent of the population they make up), profiling them would be definitely rational.
The sad fact is that racism already enjoys plenty of legitimacy
Ah, but this is a joyous fact! It means that not everyone is fooled by liberal tolerance propaganda. A lot of people still have their own heads on their shoulders, which is encouraging.
What's the point of emoji anyway? What's wrong with representing smiley face as text and converting it into picture on client side? Okay, there's everything wrong with graphic smileys, but there's even more wrong with elevating graphic smileys to the same status as symbols in writing system.
I'm definitely not saying you shouldn't be using Unicode. In fact, if your code isn't using Unicode to represent strings right now, you're almost certainly doing it wrong.
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-26 19:59
Can't we just have a sane fixed-width fixed-direction encoding instead of all this shit? 1 encoding for Western writing systems. 1 encoding for right-to-left crap. 1 encoding for all the Chinaman hieroglyphics. All of them fixed-width 16-bit encodings. Only three encodings that can satisfy everyone. Is it really that hard? Why does there have to be a one-size-fits-all totalitarism?
For example, the backslash character "\" can often be a dangerous character to let through a gatekeeper, because it can be used to access different directories. Thus a gatekeeper might specifically prevent it from getting through. The backslash is represented in UTF-8 as the byte sequence <5C>. However, as a non-shortest form, backslash could also be represented as the byte sequence<C1 9C>. When a gatekeeper does not check for non-shortest form, this situation can lead to a severe security breach.
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-27 6:12
Guys. Just when you've thought you've seen it all when it comes to emojis. Prepare yourselves.
>>128 Ugly, Jewish, lesbian, hates whites... So much shit stuffed into one human being (if she can be called that) - how does she manage to walk around without leaving fecal drips on everything?
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-27 18:35
>>135 how does a bag of shit like that get to publish for the guardian? they're a real newspaper
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-27 18:53
>>136 They're a real newspaper owned by Jews. Like all media in the West, as well as all of Hollywood. Enjoy your freedom and equal opportunity: Jews are the ones smothering everyone with oppression, but make it out like whites are somehow the worst culprits. And you can't say anything against Jews either, because then you'll be called an anti-semite and that is ANATHEMA (being an anti-white isn't looked at as something bad, and even being anti-black is nowhere near as abhorrent as an anti-semite. That is "equality", Western-style!)
>>137 What a fucking imbecile you are. If there was such a massive conspiracy, wouldn't they start by fucking removing the comments at the grauniad? Let me tell you something, you don't get to say stupid shit just because another person said something idiotic on the opinions section of a newspaper. Imagine if that was a constitutional right, everybody would be as retarded as you are.
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-27 22:06
>>139 It's true, imagine how retarded this board would be if it weren't moderated.
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-27 22:10
>>139 What a fucking imbecile you are. Even the Jews themselves admit they run Hollywood:
Do Jews Run Hollywood? - You Bet They Do...& What Of It? By Ben Stein EOnline.com
>>141 Maybe you are just stupid or something, but The Guardian doesn't have much to do with Hollywood, so yeah, thanks for the useless bit from protect-yourself-from-fukushima-radiation loonyland. I also saved you the hassle and did a quick search on the owners of the guardian and in addition of having an agreement with Alan Rusbridgernot a jew so he can run things pretty much his way, I also found that neither GMO or its parent Scott Trust seem particularly jewish. And everyone knows the comment is free section on the grauniad is pretty whack at any rate.
>>142 Why would they left criticisms up if they are looking for a total jewish supremacy? It seems kind of silly to just leave them there to diminish the powerful anti-white indoctrination from an article written by a girl with orange hair by leaving the bashful criticism there for everyone to see. Don't be silly.
Name:
emoji: the pictographic jew2015-05-27 22:56
emoji: the pictographic jew
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-27 23:36
>>144 Because owning the house is already supremacy. No loss in letting some goys leave commets underneath that barely anyone would even read.
Did you miss the stuff above, or did you just figure, what the hell, since the stupid shit above is not directed at me he can repeat it just for me because I'm that shit of a person? The whole stupid section is for opinions from people outside The Guardian at any rate. Why would you even assume people who read the opinions section would not want to read more opinions? I hope this shit act is in jest.
Did you miss the stuff above, or did you just figure, what the hell, since the stupid shit above is not directed at me he can repeat it just for me because I'm that shit of a person? The whole stupid section is for opinions from people outside The Guardian at any rate. Why would you even assume people who read the opinions section would not want to read more opinions? I hope this shit act is in jest.
>>148 The Scott Trust is probably owned by Jews in secret. Alan Rusbridger is just a white figurehead that masks the Jewish Supremacists who really run the outlet.
>>151 As opposed to the article itself, which reception was lukewarm but overall really mild, right? Especially by you people? Jesus fucking christ are you people allowed to reproduce?
>>155 What a shit article, there's shitton of jews in TV and cinema, but also immigrants and gay people because TV and cinema was deemed a degenerate artistic medium by white american christian males, in other words, straight white males deemed themselves too good to make movies whereas jews and irish people and italians and gay people embraced it fully and evolved it into the multi-millionaire industry it is now. Whoops, guess that was a mistake, huh? It's no secret to anyone, neither is it a conspiracy, and anyone who implies hollywood is the making of a jewish cabal is obviously and ignorant retard and his toxic opinions should be shot down. It's, well, free market. This doesn't cover news outlets like tha grauniad, understand this at once, retard. White people were not too good for news.
a Times correspondent actually resigned because he was not allowed to report properly what was going on in Israel, or even to use accurate words to describe facts which were undisputed. He stated: "Murdoch's executives were so scared of irritating him that, when I pulled off a little scoop by tracking, interviewing and photographing the unit in the Israeli army which killed Mohammed al-Durrah, the 12-year-old boy whose death was captured on film and became the iconic image of the conflict, I was asked to file the piece 'without mentioning the dead kid'. After that conversation, I was left wordless, so I quit."
Enjoy your pro-Israel fascism and propaganda in the "free" media.
>>161 Nice catch, I'm going to hire you as my personal editor, you are as sharp as an eagle, nothing escapes your eye, you superstar you.
>>162 Literally who cares. For such a referenced source on fringe outlets, that Richard H. Curtiss article he supposedly wrote sure is missing from, well, everywhere. And who in the right-wing doesn't support Netanyahu? I'll let you bash Netanyahu all you want tho.
>>166 Of course the Israely right-wing is pro-Israel. Or did you mean that American right-wing is pro-Israel, too? In that case, well, what can I say - Jewmericans are the most retarded nation in the world.
Or did you mean that American right-wing is pro-Israel, too?
That's what I mean. The entirety of the American right-wing is pro-Israel, I'm not even going to contest that. Fox News is no Guardian, and I don't even particularly like Murdoch. Calling Murdoch a secret jew is fringe as fuck, though.
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-28 19:48
>>169 Look into the adjacent thread, you'll see an Israely Jew name "Mordechai". Notice any similarity between "Murdoch" and "Mordechai"? Educate yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordecai
I have always believed in the future of Israel and the goals of the international Jewish community
is probably a Jew. Not to mention his widely known dislike of Muslims.
But I guess that making simple and obvious conclusions, and calling something that quacks and flies like a duck a "duck" is what you consider "fringe" nowadays.
Notice any similarity between "Murdoch" and "Mordechai"?
Come the fuck on, you putrid imbecile. Did you forget where the fuck does Christianity, you know, the culturally dominant religion, even comes from? Yes, stupid, plenty of people have hebrew derivated names. Does that mean everyone named Sarah is a fucking jew because her name appeared on the old testament in hebrew? Fuck no. Get your head checked before jumping to retarded conclusions.
I have always believed in the future of Israel and the goals of the international Jewish community
So what? Go find anyone who is a congressman from the conservative party and they are probably going to say the exact same fucking thing. For someone who is pretty into this jewish shit, you are pretty behind on Israel-US commercial relationships. Maybe because you're a fucking retard.
But I guess that making simple and obvious conclusions
Try leaps of logic from a deranged psycopath, you mental patient. Unless your post comes accompanied by a comprehensive genealogical tree not made by a quack with brain issues, then don't fucking reply to me anymore. I don't deal with mentally deranged people.
Name:
Anonymous2015-05-28 22:53
The zalgo: ۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡۜۗۙۡ
How many times have you seen things like ‘Tis the Season or Up and at ‘em with the apostrophe curled the wrong way, because someone’s word processor mistook the apostrophe for an opening single quotation mark?
The Society for Humanistic Judaism defines a Jew as "someone who identifies with the history, culture and fate of the Jewish people." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_is_a_Jew%3F
Thus, all your congressmen from the conservative party are Jews, too. No need to study any genealogical trees.
The Society for Humanistic Judaism defines a Jew as "someone who identifies with the history, culture and fate of the Jewish people
So not Murdoch, since he identifies as a christian. Make up your stupid fucking mind, is it because of his name, is it because he identifies as a jew, is it because his great great great great grandmother might have been a jew, can you at the very fucking least be consistent with your own wacko stupidity, or is your mind this lost and off-the-rails?
Thus, all your congressmen from the conservative party are Jews, too.
How is supporting Israel identifying as a jew? If I don't support Israel, am I a muslim? How does this work, can you explain your retarded line of thinking for me to laugh at?
When exactly do all the possible languages and symbols and whatever the fuck else counts as "human communication" appear together in one document, except for Unicode test pages? It makes absolutely no sense to design systems that are basically optimised for this extreme edge-case.
OPs post shows up as all squares to me, I'm not affected.
>>185 The underlying problem is that information is provided without any means to interpret and display it. That's why unicode and other standards are published, trying to sort out the mess. We wouldn't have this problem if the information came with references to code that could make use of it. Small details in some version of the unicode standard doesn't matter too much with that point of view, since the entire approach is bad.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-17 14:15
>>188 Just give each encoding a unique number. Add to every encoding a special character that will act as an encoding sigil (turning the 4 following bytes into an encoding number). When serializing any text, preface it with the number of the encoding that is used at the start of it. Then deserealizing code can just choose the correct encoding and also apply relevant encodings to chunks of Chinese in the midst of Latin, etc.
Unicode doesn't even need to exist.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-17 14:23
\c0x0204FFC1 These chars will be interpreted as 8-bit ASCII \c 0x0402CDC1 these symbols will be interpreted as some 16-bit Chinese encoding \c0x04B2BD41 these symbols will be interpreted as an 8-bit Cyrillic encoding.
The only thing that's needed is to have a special \c reserved character in every encoding. That's it, no Unicode, no varying-width codepoints, no bullshit and bloat.
Sure is a good thing we saved all that space by unifying CJK so that software needs to know the context of the character to know which glyph to display! Now we can fill it with emoticons!
Why the fuck is emoji even in Unicode? It's for letters, ffs. Emojis aren't letters, what's wrong with just leaving it to the program to parse strings like :-)?
Even shit like superscript numbers shouldn't be part of it. You want fancy math, use Latex or some kind of markup. Can't send your brilliant formula over SMS? Well too fucking bad nigger.
How are we ever going to create self-contained systems and have separation of concerns if every faggot library/standard tries to endlessly expand and dominate everything?
You want emoji, go write a fucking emoji standard. Why fuck up Unicode with your shitty pet project?
Eh, fuck Unifaggotry. You hardly ever see anyone implement the full set anyhow. 90% of fonts don't even have non-English characters (and I mean really basic shit like French œ or German ß that's in the fucking ASCII table). Every time Unicode adds useless bullshit like this that no font author will bother implementing, it will be yet another "irrelevant segment" that everybody ignores, and it will add to the public perception that most of Unicode doesn't matter since nobody implements it and nobody uses it.
When you can't rely on fonts to have full implementation, software authors will only rely on a minimal Unicode set and just delegate things like emoji to their own implementation (ie. converting :-) to an inline image). This amounts to de facto alteration of the standard because a standard (or part of a standard) that nobody uses is just some fag's irrelevant fantasy.
The funniest thing is that Unicode did this to themselves. If they limited the proportion of frivolous codepoints, the community would tend to supporting the full set, because there is an initial psychological barrier between expecting that you will support a standard fully and making the leap to saying "fuck it, I'll just do the parts I need". Once you make that leap though, it's a smooth slippery slope that ends at "Unicode fonts" that barely support ASCII.
good post, copied from an 8ch tech thread about unicode
Name:
Anonymous2015-07-07 14:23
It's for letters
No, it's not. QED
Name:
Anonymous2015-07-07 14:25
>>211 protip: pictographs are a valid use case for unicode - the one code
Eh, fuck Extended ASCII. You hardly ever see anyone implement the full set anyhow. 90% of fonts don't even have non-English characters (and I mean really basic shit like ACK or BEL). Every time Extended ASCII adds useless bullshit like this no font author will bother implementing, it will be yet another "irrelevant segment" that everybody ignores, and it will add to the public perception that most of Extended ASCII doesn't matter since nobody implements it and nobody uses it.
Name:
Anonymous2015-07-09 13:24
>>216 wow you really fucking proved me wrong hot stuff
Name:
Anonymous2015-07-09 16:34
>>217 I'm not even >>214 I'm just memeing. Why are you getting so defensive about *chan posts?
Unicode isn't so bad, it's just that the domain of text people think is simple and it's just not. When you look at the breadth of what unicode does/can do, it's really not that bad.
The mistake is in people thinking text is simple. It never has been, it's just in the past we had the luxury of mostly ignoring reality and using ASCII instead.
Name:
Anonymous2015-07-17 14:58
>>220 Let me guess, you believe that text is simple? That 7 bits are enough to encode all the characters that the world needs?
or so you would think.. nope, emoji is much more important. You can't copy these out the PDF and you can't generate them with javascript \u. but you can do both with emoji. Blackfacing your homo family smiley face that you send with the ipad is more important.
Name:
Anonymous2015-07-31 3:25
>>233 That's from Unicode 8.0, which just came out a month ago. Support for it has not been added to your OS.
Emoji have been part of the standard a lot longer.
Name:
Cudder !cXCudderUE2015-08-01 15:04
>>94 Nothing, it's just another way for those who can't work on actually useful things to justify getting paid. Autoemoticonification is one thing everyone can do without. Personally I hate the autoemoticonifying of text, everyone knows how to write the characters : and ) and read them too, that's the whole point of emoticons - they're constructed from regular characters. Emoticonifying sequences of characters by replacing them with pictures is just another level of unnecessary complexity and breaks up the text.
I am an antiautoemoticonificationist and I support the antiautoemoticonificationisation of textual communication.
>>246 Are they attempting to be inclusive of minority beers too now?
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-19 5:02
>>38 Read section 8 of this page. It seems they are planning to make embedded graphics a part of unicode. Why don't we just send all our text as bmp files.
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-20 4:22
>>249 Did you know that modern glyphs originated as symbolic pictographs? There's plenty of space in Unicode 32 for any old thing that anybody would care to use.
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-28 7:49
The Eggplant Emoji Is The Next Frontline Of Online Harassment The harmless purple eggplant emoji is being used as a symbol of sexual power and degradation
"just like the case involving the use of a gun emoji that resulted in an arrest last year, as sexual harassment online moves further into the spotlight we very well may see harassers going to court over unrequested acts of eggplanting."
ASCII art/smileys = emotes made with 7-bit cock-asian characters Emoji = emotes made with japanese (-ji) characters Emoticons = emotes made with specialized graphical icons/font characters
FUCK people who use "emoji" for all emotes. Fuck em right down their wrong-speaking fucking œsophaguses.
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-16 12:05
>>269 Thank you. It's like the past decades of yellow-faced 16px bitmaps called "emoticons" just went into some sort of black hole in western memory.
>>283 Hey, that picture is a reference to the Nox game. There's probably no more than one in a thousand people who get the reference. It doesn't look anything like Nox Mimics, too, which makes it even harder to get.
You genocided no monsters. You were lucky. You were fast. You were purely functional. You defeated 235 Sofware Design Patterns. You were piously aligned. You are dead.
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-25 22:27
>>285 Getting a reference to popular culture and entertainment isn't something to be proud of, you fucking mongoloid redditard.
>>295 Why the fuck did you quote the same thing thrice, retard?
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-27 20:06
>>296 Zero quotes was the string "/pol/" alone. One quote quoted the string "/pol/". The second quote quoted the first quote, i.e. the quote of the string "/pol/". The third quote quoted the second quote, i.e. the quote quoting the first quote, i.e. the quote of the string "/pol/".
It's not hard to figure out, idiot.
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-27 22:01
>>297 He wasn't questioning how a quote with a depth of three works, but rather what motivated you to quote to a depth of three.
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-28 13:00
>>298 Simple. My motor neurons instructed my fingers to hold shift and hit the . key not once, not twice, but three times.
👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀 good shit go౦ԁ sHit👌 thats ✔ some good👌👌shit right👌👌there👌👌👌 right✔there ✔✔if i do Saү so my self 💯 i say so 💯 thats what im talking about right there right there (chorus: ʳIᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMmМ💯 👌👌 👌НO0ОଠOOOOOОଠଠOoooᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ 👌 👌👌 👌 💯 👌 👀 👀 👀 👌👌Good shit
Name:
Anonymous2015-11-15 20:44
>>321 Nice strictly decreasing GET, but you should check my dubs.
✋🏻❓❗️❓What ❓ tHe FUCK😡😠😡😠 did 👉🏻you☠ just☠ fucking☠ say💢💢 🆎out me😡😡, you little bitch❗️❗️?❓ ❌❌I’ll 😠 have you know💫 I 🎓graduated🎓 🏅🎖🏅top 💯 of my💯🆑ass🏅 in the Navy👷 Seals👷👷, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret🤐 raids 🔫🔫 on Al-Quaeda👳👳👳👳, and I have over 300💯💯💯 confirmed kills😵. I am trained in 🐒🐒gorilla🐒 warfare💣 and I’m the top⬆⬆ sniper🔫 in🔫 the🔫 entire 🇺🇸US🇺🇸armed🇺🇸forces🇺🇸. You are ❌❌❌ nothing❌ to me but just another target🎯. I 😡😠😡😠 will wipe you the fuck out with precision🎯🎯 the likes of which has ❌never been seen👁 👀👁 👀 before on this Earth🌎, mark👀 my👀 fucking👀 words📖. You think 🤔💭 you can get away with saying that 💩shit to me over the Internet💻🌐💻🌐💻🌐💻🌐? Think again, fucker.😡 As we speak I am contacting my secret🤐 🤐 🤐 network of 🕵spies🕵 across the 🇺🇸U🇺🇸S🇺🇸A🇺🇸 and your 💻🌐IP💻🌐 is being traced 💻🌐right now so you😡 better prepare for the 🌩🌩🌩storm, maggot. 😡 The ☂☂ storm 🌧 ⛈ 🌩 that wipes out the 😹😹pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re ⚰⚰ fucking 💀dead☠☠☠☠☠☠, kid. I can be 🌎 anywhere🌎, anytime ⏰, and I can kill☠☠ you in over seven hundred 💯💯💯💯💯💯💯 ways, and that’s just with my👊👊 bare hands👊👊💪💪👌. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed🔫🚫⚔ 🚫🔪🚫💣🚫 combat, but I have access to the 🔫🔫entire💣 arsenal💣 of the 🇺🇸United🇺🇸States🇺🇸Marine🇺🇸Corps🇺🇸 and I will✔️✔️ use it to its full ✔️extent to wipe your miser🆎le ass🤓 off the face🌎 of the 🌎continent🌎, you 💩little shit💩💩 If only you could have known what unholy ✝🚫☪🚫🕉🚫☸🚫🔯🚫☯️🚫 retribution your little “🆑ever” comment was 🆎out to bring 👇down 👇upon you, maybe you would have held👅 your fucking👅👅 tongue👅👅👅. But you couldn’t❌, you didn’t❌, and now✔️✔️ you’re paying💲 the 💸price💰💰, you goddamn idiot. 💢 I will 💩💩💩💩shit💩💩💩 😡😠😾fury😡😠😾😡😠😾 all over you 😡😠😾 and you will ☂☂drown in it ☂☂. ☠☠☠☠ You’re ☠☠☠☠ fucking ☠☠☠☠ dead, ☠☠☠☠ kiddo.☠☠☠☠
C# identifiers can include Unicode escape sequences (\u1234 etc) C# identifiers can include Unicode characters in the category “Other, formatting” (Cf) but these are ignored when comparing identifiers for equality The Mongolian Vowel Separator (U+180E) has oscillated between the Cand Zs categories a couple of times
When discussing this, Vladimir Reshetnikov mentioned the Mongolian Vowel Separator (U+180E) which has had an interesting life. It was introduced in Unicode 3.0.0, when it was in the Cf category (“other, formatting”). Then in Unicode 4.0.0 it was moved into the Zs (separator, space) category. In Unicode 6.3.0 it was then moved back to the Cf category.
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-22 17:59
>>348 That's what you get when some retard thinks you should allow characters outside A-Za-z0-9_ in identifiers-
I left that post incomplete because I realized any character can be part of a symbol in most Lisps, and I'm not going to criticize Lisp.
C# identifiers can include Unicode characters in the category “Other, formatting” (Cf) but these are ignored when comparing identifiers for equality
Looks like C# is at fault here for trying to be smart and actually being retarded.
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-22 19:04
>>349 I started raging at you for not even including the #\- character as a possibility in symbol names, but I'm not going to criticize not criticizing Lisp.
>>352 Fuck off weeaboo. In the real world, everybody from any country should be able to read, understand, modify, write, call and integrate code, which requires typing things in an alphabet known to every single programmer in the world. It happens to be latin because it's by far the most popular alphabet out of the simple, non-insane/autistic/retarded/hieroglyph alphabets.
These characters are currently under ISO ballot for inclusion in ISO/IEC 10646:2016 (5th ed.) (see WG2 N4705 pages 130, 131, 135, and 137–138). Most of the 8,514 characters in this document will feed into Unicode version 10.0 in June 2017, but if national bodies have no objection to the emoji characters in the current CD ballot which closes 29 February 2016, then it is very likely that the Unicode Techinal Committee (UTC) will fast-track most or all of these 74 emoji into Unicode 9.0. None of these characters are particularly contentious or controversial, and I do not see any reason why they should not all be included in Unicode 9.0, but the final decision will not be made until the UTC meets in early May 2016.
>>360 they've included 4 new languages but taht's just a subsection at the end.
the really important thing is WOO A PICTURE OF A GLASS OF FUCKNIG MILK
Name:
Anonymous2016-01-04 2:29
from the comments section
I have the Unicode font created by Jing Yongshi 景永時 and modified by myself that is used for the Unicode and 10646 code charts (and which I use for the Tangut glyph images in my Tangut blog posts), but unfortunately I do not have any rights to the font, and cannot distribute it. I had hoped to create my own Unicode Tangut font in time for the release of Unicode 9.0 in June, but that seems increasingly unlikely given the current demands on my time.
Jing Yongshi needs to take the GNUpill tbh
Name:
Anonymous2016-01-04 2:41
Submitting Emoji Character Proposals Submitting a Proposal
To submit a proposal for a new emoji character, fill out the form for Submitting Character Proposals. Include with that form the following information, and submit as per How to Submit Proposal Documents.
Osage /ˈoʊseɪdʒ/[2] is a Siouan language spoken by the Osage people of Oklahoma. The last native speaker, Lucille Roubedeaux, died ca. 2005.[3]
In February 2014 a conference was held by the script's creator, Herman Mongrain Lookout, and the staff at the Osage Nation Language Department, along with UCS expert Michael Everson. They settled on a more detailed representation of the sounds in Osage and accounted for and documented changes in the Osage language. The result of the conference was a script reform; this included introduction of lower case, abolition of two ligatures, and the addition of at least one new character. The reformed alphabet is phonemic.[2]
WHO THE FUCK THINKS EMOJI COULD EVEN HAVE SKIN COLOUR!?!
EMOJI DEPICT EMOTIONS. EMOTIONS ARE NOT SKIN COLOUR!!!
The colour of an emoji is the colour of the font it's displayed with. Isn't that such a bloody obvious fact?
Name:
Anonymous2016-01-04 6:39
>>365 But then they would all be niggers. Pretty fucking gross.
The obvious fact is that emoji should be displayed by the program and parsed\sent in some format like :thumbsup" or :asianwhorecrying: or :pileofshit:. If there's enough room for this garbage, then why was CJK unified?
Name:
Anonymous2016-01-04 7:20
>>366 because CJK glyphs are relevant only to people speaking chinese and emoticons are universal. CJK is also far larger and requires more technical support than a static emoticon.
