/prog/ - Check out my program

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-03 13:04

#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define LEN 15
int print(i,j) {
  for (; i < LEN; ++i)
    printf(" ");
  puts("a");
  usleep(50000);
  return 0;
}
int main(void)
{
  int i, j;
  for(;;) {
    for (j = 0; j < LEN; print(i), ++j)
      i = j;
    for (j = 0; j < LEN; print(i), ++j)
      i = LEN-1-j;
  }
  return 0;
}

Do you like it?

At first I tried to make it be the SICP snake, with the head going down, but it was too hard for me.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-06 18:11

>>47

define
define
define

Just use def, ya verbose faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-06 18:27

>>51

ya verbose faggot

(define def define); ya verbose faggot!

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-06 23:44

>>51
who are you quoting

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 0:26

>>53
He's quoting >>51.

I know you're mad because mean people have asked you the same. Try not to abuse the quote function and it won't happen again! Easy, right? What are you waiting for? Start using quotes properly! :)

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 1:11

check 'em

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 2:04

>>54
Why would >>51 be quoting himself?

>>55

1:11

Nice.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 2:18

>>54,56
Can you two stop assuming >>51-sama is male?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 3:03

>>57
assemble pocketknife image

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 3:07

>>56
who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 6:30

>>57
I am not assuming anything. Referring to a person of unknown sex using male pronouns is quite common.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 13:01

How would Cudder write this program?
He wouldn't! Cudder is all talk and no action.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 17:53

>>57
Check your privilege, male programmer!

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 18:19

>>57
Can you stop assuming >>51-guy is a weeaboo?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 20:23

>>63
Well, that's just silly. If that were the case, why would he be here?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 20:37

>>57,63
No, it's idiotic to assume otherwise.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 20:49

>>17
I wonder what this does to the stack

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 23:52

>>66
Dubs☑

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-08 22:37

>>66
That's easy to investigate.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-08 22:42

>>68

_I^N_V^E_S^T_I^G_A^T_E

MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-09 17:18

>>69
who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-09 17:33

>>70
Hey /g/-friend, here's a tip. We're not actually against quoting anything that wasn't exactly there, or memes or anything like that; we're just against you and your shitty greentext and other idiot memes. It doesn't matter how much you spam,, no one is going to start appreciating your bullshit or treating your posts with anything other than contempt.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-09 17:36

*farts on thread*

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-27 5:39

who am i quoting

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-27 10:53

>>71
I am against quoting anything that wasn't exactly there, or memes or anything like that. The quoting function has been this way for decades. Go get a new and different function for your trendy news maymays. Hashtags are an example that I don't loathe because people didn't change its use from existing syntax - instead they took an unused symbol in computing and gave it a meaning.

Check out my program

1 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-03 13:04

51 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-06 18:11

52 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-06 18:27

53 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-06 23:44

54 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 0:26

55 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 1:11

56 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 2:04

57 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 2:18

58 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 3:03

59 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 3:07

60 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 6:30

61 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 13:01

62 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 17:53

63 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 18:19

64 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 20:23

65 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 20:37

66 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 20:49

67 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-07 23:52

68 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-08 22:37

69 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-08 22:42

70 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-09 17:18

71 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-09 17:33

72 Name: Anonymous 2015-05-09 17:36

73 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-27 5:39

74 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-27 10:53