Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Rust 1.0 Released

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-15 19:09

Why haven't you rewritten the past 4 decades of software yet?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-15 19:18

Rustafarian
The community generally doesn't like that name, as it has awkward, appropriating connotations.
That language was SJW quality!

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-15 19:19

>>2
Whom are you quoting?

Name: Rustafarian 2015-05-15 19:34

Rustafarian

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-15 19:58

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-16 9:57

Fuck yea finally I can stop using C and C++.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-16 10:29

You don't need to rewrite it, just make a translator from C to Rust. It shouldn't be that hard considering the languages are similar.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-16 15:21

>>7
It shouldn't be that hard
Yeah, a couple pages of Rust

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-16 22:26

>>7
you can't just embed rust in C

rust has static checks to make sure it understands your memory access patterns (e.g. you can't make a doubly linked list in rust)

(im ignoring the unsafe { ... } construct which ruins every safety guarantee that you ever expected to get by using rust)

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-16 22:46

>>9
Not just, no. But Rust supports the C ABI. It's not even embedding at that point, it's just linking.

(im ignoring the unsafe { ... } construct which ruins every safety guarantee that you ever expected to get by using rust)
This isn't true, but it's probably bait anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-17 0:24

dubs

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-17 4:48

>>1
Does Rust support static linking?
Do Rust programs require the bloated runtime libraries, or can I strip them out?
Does Rust have an inline assembler?
Does Rust support vectorization intrinsics.
Does Rust support concurrency intrinsics?
Does Rust have zero overhead?
Is Rust only a marginal improvement over C and C++, and does it perhaps compromise in other areas thus taking a step backwards?
Is the expressive power of Rust an order of magnitude better, or is it simply just a little better in a few constrained cases?

Guess what? Rust is trash.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-17 6:37

>>12
Yes.
No.
Yes.
Nyeah.
*shrug*
Almost everywhere.
No.
Depends on whether or not you have an order of magnitude more to express.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-17 9:48

Why did they waste all this effort creating an entirely new language from scratch when they could have just updated cyclone to 64 bit?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-17 10:10

>>13
Spoken like a true faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-17 10:18

>>1
First I gotta spend few years to rewrite all my fibs implementations.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-17 14:53

unsafe {

}


wow nice i love programs that crash.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List