Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

r7rs-large

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-21 6:16

How come the working group for r7rs-large hasn't made any posts since last year?

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/scheme-reports-wg2

I hope they have not given up.

What do you think the end language will look like?
Would it be more preferable to use than CL or Clojure?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-21 7:39

o boy i sure am feelin large ...
/farts liquid

computer animation? big fucking deal ...

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-21 8:23

Scheme was never meant to be large.

Would it be more preferable to use than CL or Clojure?
Isn't CL already implementable in Scheme?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-21 13:16

Because google has mode groups unusable

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-21 16:24

r7rs fails to support modular programming

you cannot build a program with a subcomponent that may be replaced

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-21 19:27

Isn't CL already implementable in Scheme?

This is a terminal case of the "could be done", also known as The Lisp Disease.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-21 19:29

>>1
What do you think the end language will look like?
I don't care. There won't be a single standards-conforming implementation anyways. And Scheme is and has always been a toy language. I use it to solve SICP exercises, but I couldn't care less for some idiots making standards worth only wiping one's ass with them in an effort to make Scheme into something more than what it's useful for.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-21 20:42

>>7
What are your favorite Scheme-like languages that are not toy languages?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-21 20:45

>>8
javascript XD

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-21 20:46

>>7
HAHAHAHA
YOU THINK YOURE THOUGH UH ?
I HAVE ONE WORD FOR YOU
THE FORCED INDENTATION OF THE CODE
GET IT ?
I DONT THINK SO
YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT MY OTHER CAR I GUESS ?
ITS A CDR
AND IS PRONOUNCED ``CUDDER''
OK YOU FUQIN ANGERED AN EXPERT PROGRAMMER
THIS IS /prog/
YOU ARE ALLOWED TO POST HERE ONLY IF YOU HAVE ACHIEVED SATORI
PROGRAMMING IS ALL ABOUT ``ABSTRACT BULLSHITE'' THAT YOU WILL NEVER COMPREHEND
I HAVE READ SICP
IF ITS NOT DONE YOU HAVE TO
TOO BAD RUBY ON RAILS IS SLOW AS FUCK
BBCODE AND ((SCHEME)) ARE THE ULTIMATE LANGUAGES
ALSO
WELCOME TO /prog/
EVERY THREAD WILL BE REPLIED TO
NO EXCEPTION

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-23 15:51

>>8
Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-23 15:58

>>10
Thanks for a meme redux, /prague/

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-23 16:24

>>6
No you really can do it, but the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-23 16:29

>>13
You seem to misunderstand the "could be done disease". It's not that the things Lispers say can be done in Lisp actually cannot be done, no - it's that they saying that it can be done in Lisp is the most they actually do.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-23 16:34

>>14
Your argument is a loose and unverifiable generalization of a hazy group of people. I can't make a well founded statement that would even be relevant. fuck off vanila

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-30 15:43

http://community.schemewiki.org/?scheme-faq-macros

There is a bug in the R5RS sample implementation of letrec:

Holy fuck Scheme is not only for retards (and undergrads), it's also by retards!

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-30 15:51

>>16
anyone who makes a mistake ever is a retard
you are ill

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-30 16:02

>>17
You're the one ill here, making up quotes that no one said.

I never said that anyone who makes a mistake ever is a retard.

I only said that if there is a mistake in the sample implementation for a standard of a language designed with minimalism as one of the main goals, and this mistake is in such a core and uber-important form as letrec, then the people behind that language and its standards are retarded.

But you probably will not be able to comprehend the difference here, ricegrain-brain.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-30 16:55

I don't see the valid usecases for any let forms except letrec-values.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-30 17:21

* let by default
* let* when you need them to be done in order
* letrec when you are defining a local recursive function
* let-values is a new great thing that subsumes the awful call-with-values

and there are some weird stuff like letrec* with papers on it, but these things are so advanced its not generally important

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-30 20:58

Sometimes, people refer to languages like Scheme (and Lisp and Smalltalk) as untyped. This is very misleading. In a truly untyped language (like FORTH and most assembly languages), you can interpret a value any way you want--as an integer, a pointer, or whatever. (You can also do this in C, using unsafe casts, which is a source of many time-consuming bugs.(3) )

ftp://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/garbage/cs345/schintro-v14/schintro_34.html#SEC35

That's why the correct terminology is unityped.

Name: Anonymous 2016-07-11 5:45

(stopping the dubsfaggot from dubsbumping)

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List