life in prison for creating a websiteOr maybe, you know, for the murders he is accused of ordering?
Before the sentencing, the parent of one man, who died from using heroin that prosecutors said was purchased on Silk Road, accused Mr. Ulbricht of being driven by greed in making drugs easily available to vulnerable people.
"No drug dealer from Harlem or the Bronx would have made these arguments," said Forrest. "It's an argument of privilege."
They are both scammers who set up websites
Anyone who might consider doing something similar, the judge added, needed to understand clearly “and without equivocation that if you break the law this way, there will be very serious consequences.”
She dismissed the defense’s argument that because Silk Road had operated online, it was safer than traditional street-level drug dealing. She described how Silk Road had expanded the market for drugs and the demand by users, and cited collateral damage, from the violence associated with drug production overseas to addiction, crime and the destruction of families. Silk Road, she said, was just “a step in the chain.”
Before his arrest in New Zealand, he was the world's number one-ranked Modern Warfare 3 player out of more than 15 million online players.[27] On 23 January 2012 he lost the position and dropped to number two.[28]What a fucking badass.
Drugs should be legalTypical liberal retard.
The effects on society of banning drugs is worse than the effect of having them legal like alcohol.Typical liberal lies (take a look at Netherlands for example, filled by liberal weed smokers).
We end up with increased crimeThat's because people do drugs in the first place.
increased prison populations, and huge amounts of government money wastedExecute them and take their money maybe? Sounds like a good deal.
Typical liberal retard.Typical moron detected.
Typical liberal lies (take a look at Netherlands for example, filled by liberal weed smokers).That doesn't prove anything. If it's legal what's the difference between weed smokers and drinkers?
That's because people do drugs in the first place.Wrong. It's because by banning substances you've created a huge black market for them where gangs and other organised crime outfits can make tons of money.
Execute them and take their money maybe? Sounds like a good deal.Sounds like a cunt idea made by a cunt who wants to live in Saudi Arabia.
I am not really sure why you care in the first place, people who take drugs are the lowest shit of the society.No. People who never question their government are.
I'm not even slightly liberal, I just don't believe in banning substances because ``MUH FEELINGS. IT'S SCARY! THINK OF DUH CHILLUNS!''Typical liberal pretending not to be liberal. Every liberal tends to do that.
If it's legal what's the difference between weed smokers and drinkers?That only subhumans actually get drunk while many normal people drink without getting drunk (getting drunk should be illegal too).
Legalise the substances and all that crime goes away.And then you create a bigger crime because people will start taking drugs.
What would nigger gangs in the US sell if drugs were legal?Sell them cheaper and home-made.
No. People who never question their government are.Then why the people that smoke weed here are only the sandniggers, people with sandnigger behavior (who of course never have been to a university) and Albanians?
Sounds like a cunt idea made by a cunt who wants to live in Saudi Arabia.Sounds like a idea that solves the problem you mentioned.
No. People who never question their government are.Yes, question your government. But not just question it, do it based on what the jew told you. Jew says that drugs are good for the goy.
I've talked to someone who's actually been to the NetherlandsMe too, he smokes weed every day.
But they wont be able to compete. They'd make the same profit weaving baskets for people. Gangs wont kill each other to get an edge on selling baskets.What would nigger gangs in the US sell if drugs were legal?Sell them cheaper and home-made.
of the lower classOf the people that have the behavior of a nigger.
And then you create a bigger crimeProve it. Drug-related crime is, as of now, a bunch of globally large clandestine organisms dedicated to mostly drug smuggling, but also can and have engaged in kidnapping, murder, theft, extortion and gun smuggling. Running these organizations obviously requires extremely deep pockets, pockets that get lined up through drug trafficking. Legalization will thwart the money income for these organizations as people will prefer the legal alternative every single time (since it'd be very evidently cheaper as their availability would not be controlled by a monopolic criminal organization), and thus will get dismantled, unable to afford their mere existence. Explain how this scenario of dwindling criminal organizations represents a bigger crime wave in detail. You can also mention your brain condition that makes you think isolated crime due to substance abuse is somehow more pervasive and dangerous than organizations that dedicate themselves and their entire money solely to crime, if you want.
Sounds like a cunt idea made by a cunt who wants to live in Saudi ArabiaSounds like an idea that solves the problem you mentioned
how do youquote within a quote
world4chhowfromdifferentthisisworksworked*
Also Palestine is an illegitimate country populated 100% by terrorists who should be wiped out.I don't disagree on that, but I think that for every mudslime. A bit less for the kikes.
REVERSE SPOILER