There exists a race such that their Mode is "CRUSH KILL DESTROY". Said race is called "Jewish". There exists an impossibility for said race to exhibit love [inclusive]OR understanding.
That's not me talking, that's The Almighty Science! Poop me wrong, /g/, poop me wrong!
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-15 7:54
>>15 THE CHAMBER OF SECRETS? HARRY'S A MAD TRAIL BLAZER. LET'S PUT HIM ON THE SHOW
Hey Nikita Sadkov are you the same in the discussion on OpenGameArt currently?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-15 17:29
Why do Russians hate jews so much? Putin is half jewish isn't he even?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-15 17:51
>>20 Because they own Russia and got very rich pilfering its natural resources. Putin is Russian, not a Jew, but he obviously serves Jewish oligarchs (he was even promoted to president by one of them, Boris Berezovskiy).
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-15 17:58
>>21 Didn't he have Boris killed recently? I heard that visious dogs took a leisurely 15 min to rip Boris Berezovskiy apart, legs first, like a deer. After that a markorev pistol was dropped next to the still living Berezovskiy.
Is this accurate? (The pistol had no bullets, the dogs continued. Dogs like fresh meat)
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-15 18:00
The best defense against attack dogs is to throw a ball and give them a treat.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-15 18:04
>>23 why didn't Boris Berezovskiy do so? Why did he allow himself to be eaten? I heard putin's men cut his fingers off first. Is this true?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-15 18:06
>>24 That's a precaution so he can't throw treats to the attack dogs and befriend them.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-15 18:11
>>22 Oligarchs get into fights. Just because he ordered Bereza killed doesn't mean he doesn't serve others. He has lots of "friends" like Sechin, Timchenko, the Rotenbergs, Deripaska, Vexelberg etc. They all get tasty contracts and protection from the state. And when Sechin asks for 1.5 trillion rubles from the budget to pay Rosneft's foreign debts, Putin gives. The result is this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11296233/Russian-economic-crisis-live.html
>>25 Was it a sin for Putin to have Bereza eaten alive by dogs after his fingers were sliced of one by one?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-15 20:48
>>27 Good-bad is a poor description. He is an intelligence officer, the kind who would spy on you in NSA or infiltrate your organization in the CIA or murder traitors in the FBI. He likes control and distrusts people; he is cautious to the point of undecisiveness; he has a certain twisted, sadistic idea of patriotism - trying to protect the national interests but in a crooked way; he likes to resolve conflicts seemingly within the bounds of law ("to friends, give the good treatment, and to the rest - treatment according to law"); he is not greedy but he lets his friends steal like crazy while watching over them and slapping them occasionally to keep them in line (in his own, mafioso idea of "line"); he likes to do things through someone else's hands while staying seemingly above the problem; he is a cynical liar in public speeches, those are pretty useless to listen to; he has a democratic streak but feels genuinely betrayed by the West; he was hired as a crisis-manager but convinced himself that anyone other than him would be worse for the country. Is that good or bad?
>>28 Stop making shit up, secret services don't work that way.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-15 21:08
>>29 You are saying Putin did not have Bereza eaten alive by dogs after his fingers were sliced of one by one?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-15 21:15
>>29 He sounds like a good guy then, he helps his friends and family, atleast honourable. In the west you are expected to betray your friends and family for the law. The police come to the schools and tell the children to narc on their family members, this is what I remeber.
From the outside looking in Russia was nothing in the 90s, I remeber when communism ended we, civilians, all thought the USA would now help Russia become prosperous in addition to powerful as it had been. Instead Russia was dropped and ignored. Putin brought it back. It looks like he's the only one to run things from this vantage point. Also now in the west we are totally run by women and (somehow) gays. Never thought that would happen, I remeber gays were just killed and that was "ok" and men still could marry a 12 yr old young woman in the south when the wall came down. All of that has changed. Better a mafia guy running ONE european country who won't let it get so... cuntish, than every euro type country being just for women and gays.
Was it a sin for Putin to have Bereza eaten alive by dogs after his fingers were sliced of one by one? (In Russian Orthodox religion?)
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-16 15:39
Nikita Sadkov Are you the same Nikita Sadkov on OpenGameArt in the thread about Debian?????????????????
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-16 16:41
>>31 He does help his friends, yeah. For example, people who were in a consumer cooperative which he formed in the nineties all ended up very rich and in high positions and with expensive villas. Some of his other friends got the contracts to build stuff for the upcoming world football cup or to build a bridge to Crimea. Sechin is probably one of the best friends, though, since he got his company - the largest oil company in Russia - when Yukos (Hodorkovskiy's oil company) was pillaged after the "investigation".
The Western cunt-rule does have one advantage though - the economies are pretty efficient. Puticonomy is extremely weak, everything's monopolized and even those monopolies are running out of money. They thrived on cheap Western loans, but now with sanctions in, they struggle to find money to pay those hundreds of billions of dollars. Gazprom had to strike and extremely ridiculous deal with the Chinese, Rosneft' had to predate the golden reserves to make loan payments, the railway monopoly is starting to cancel train routes, etc. Russian economy is now like a half-dead behemoth of corruption who was only kept alive by ultrahigh oil prices and endless loans, and is now dying and crumbling. One has to wonder if being in a prosperous country of faggots and cunts is really worse than in this imperial medievalism with nothing to eat but shows of military power and patriotic hymns.
>>41 Why doesn't Putin's Royssia allow men to marry little girls? The bible does...
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-16 16:48
>>41 Are you russian? You sound american in the way you write your prose.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-16 16:49
The Western cunt-rule does have one advantage though - the economies are pretty efficient.
That only helps women, and I'm not a woman.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-16 16:50
One has to wonder if being in a prosperous country of faggots and cunts is really worse than in this imperial medievalism with nothing to eat but shows of military power and patriotic hymns.
If russia was medieval, or just pre-mid/late 19th century then men could marry 7 and 9 yr old pretty girls and then yes, it would be worth it.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-16 17:05
>>42 Does it really? At any rate, the Russian Orthodox Church Ltd. is considered more right than the Bible here.
>>44 Grow some muscles and suntan, and become a male stripper whore for old rich MILFs.
Rape of young girl = you keep young girl and pay father. It says it in the hebrew.
Grow some muscles and suntan, and become a male stripper whore for old rich MILFs.
I want a cute young girl child, not old fucking woman.
Does it really? At any rate, the Russian Orthodox Church Ltd. is considered more right than the Bible here.
So russian church is against man+young girl? Sounds like all christians, even though the God of the book of deuteronomy is fine with it. Shoud they all be killed because they are all feminists? (First thing women had banned is men marrying young girls, previous to 1870s men could marry 7 and 9 yr old girls in America, Europe, etc)
I will be honest with you. If I met you, and you were like this, I would pour ignighter fluid upon you and you would sing too, for a time.
This would be in keeping with the Biblical law in Deuteronomy that says to kill anyone that would entice you to follow another judge/god/ruler than that of Deuteronomy.
Since you are opposed to such laws as Deuteronomy 22 28-29, in hebrew, which says that if a man rapes a young girl (the ages from infancy till adolecence, the hebrew word indicates) who is in her father's house (ie virgin) and has not been given away yet to another man, the man keeps the girl and pays the father 50 silver, not to send the girl away ever though: she stays as his woman (of which the man, ofcourse in Deuteronomy, may have many).
So I would have to kill you. Not merely pour golden water over you like a faggot.
This means that if we want to know whether an English translation has faithfully and accurately translated the inspired author’s intended meaning we must turn to the original language of the sacred text. Once this is done, it will become quite apparent that the Holy Bible does not sanction that a rapist marry his victim.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-16 18:15
22:5 The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.
Women wearing pants are an abomination unto the LORD and should be stoned to death
22:11 Thou shalt not wear a garment of divers sorts, as of woollen and linen together.
Can't wear jeans and t-shirts at the same time
22:21 Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.
Any woman who was not a virgin at marriage should be killed
we pour urine over them and make them sing I would pour ignighter[sic] fluid upon you and you would sing So I would have to kill you I hope you are killed cruely[sic]
Shave and a hair-cut, Nig-gers
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-16 20:01
>>48 Nice intensity. Few others can deliver the same in writing.
This means that if we want to know whether an English translation has faithfully and accurately translated the inspired author’s intended meaning we must turn to the original language of the sacred text. Once this is done, it will become quite apparent that the Holy Bible does not sanction that a rapist marry his victim.
He is an apologist, ignore everything he says, his job is to further the lie that the current belief system is the same as what once was believed.
Deuteronomy 22 28-29, hebrew. Here is a word study of the hebrew that will show you that it is about the rape of a girl. You will reject this because you are a good pro-feminist person and the only thing that will end the reign of your belief system is killings.
>>60 It's world4ch, thank you very much. Also, if you weren't there then, then you aren't welcome here now. Please go back to /g/.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-17 4:54
>>61 yeah, if I said something like that on a world of warcraft forum, I'd get some dipshit saying "it's WoW, thank you very much". take a look at yourself in the mirror, that's if you haven't convinced yourself you're /prog/snake and you no longer exist physically, and you exist within the bits being transmitted across wires.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-17 4:57
there's nothing sadder than measuring your e-penis by how long you've been wasting your time on a stupid website. is this your life? lmao
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-17 4:58
I'll let you catch up with the other senior citizens
>>62 Do not presume to mock Lain. Of course I am not ᴛʜᴇ ʟᴏʀᴅ, I have merely been touched by her magnificent accolade, making me far superior to you.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-17 5:45
there's nothing sadder than measuring your e-penis by how long you've been wasting your time on a stupid website. is this your life? lmao
What else would he do? Marry a little girl? Nope can't do that? Work an unpaied internship or min wage job?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-17 7:32
Judaism is a religion of hate, intolerance and Jewish supremacy. Funny how whites look up to it for protection from feminism - exchanging one yoke for another. Only the true Aryan religion - Brahmanism - will set whites free.