Another Developer is Down Due to SJWs

He can contribute because he is a "pedo".

https://soylentnews.org/submit.pl?op=viewsub&subid=6458&note=&title=OpenSource+release+story+removed+due+to+developers+opposition+to+Social+Justice

http://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/software/linux-gaming/48970-xonotic-forked-chaosesqueanthology-sees-new-release/page2?115776-Xonotic-Forked-ChaosEsqueAnthology-Sees-New-Release/page2=

Who is mikeeusa? What did he do?

http://pipedot.org/pipe/B8DJ
Debian has rejected opensource game, gives no reason, last time was because of hate of a particular contributor.

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784287

From: Ansgar Burchardt
To: 784287-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Not suitable for Debian
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 08:57:59 +0200

Not suitable for Debian.

They don't say why. They package nexuiz, xonotic, openarena, etc for debian.
Last time they rejected a package where a contributor they dislike was involved in the project they indicated that it was because they did not like the author ("troll")
(ie: no non SJW projects allowed in debian what-so-ever).
( http://soylentnews.org/submit.pl?op=viewsub&subid=6458&note=&title=OpenSource+release+story+removed+due+to+developers+opposition+to+Social+Justice )
( https://pipedot.org/story/2014-11-21/opensource-game-rejected-from-debian-for-authors-social-beliefs )

This time they gave a vague statement.

Could they be forced to explain themselves?

The project is fully libre/free/opensource. Code and media. DFSG compliant. Similar projects all are packaged, including ones that are not DFSG compliant. This one is not. They refused to allow an earlier DFSG compliant work (a casino) game who had a disliked person (anti-social-justice/anti-feminist opinion) as a contributor. Is this why they rejected this libre videogame?

If so is there any action that can be taken to expose the true

Ongoing discussion:
http://opengameart.org/forumtopic/debian-has-rejected-opensource-game-gives-no-reason-last-time-was-because-of-hate-of-a#comment-38447

Take the fucking culture wars somewhere else.

You never say that when SJWs are speaking, only when opposition.

I don't mind pedos to much, and think his dismissal was justified, for acting like an ass.

He was dismissed for being against women's rights. This is why his projects were deleted and rejected. That is opensource meritocracy.

In the past such a person would then either give up or kill the people doing the cencoring, but this is the internet now and it isn't one on one contact.