Repository With Liberal ToS

What is the most free repo service, where everything is allowed, as long as it is okay with law?

All major repos have retarded restrictions, that you cant have a word "nigger" in your code or your video game can't have violent or sexual content.

https://help.github.com/articles/github-terms-of-service/

You must not transmit any worms or viruses or any code of a destructive nature.
We may [...] remove Content and Accounts containing Content that we determine in our sole discretion are unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, pornographic, obscene or otherwise objectionable

http://slashdotmedia.com/terms-of-use/

When you create or make available your SourceForge Content on Sourceforge.net, you represent and warrant that:
your SourceForge Content is not obscene, lewd, lascivious, excessively violent, harassing, libelous or slanderous, does not advocate the violent overthrow of the government of the United States, does not incite, encourage or threaten immediate physical harm against another;
your SourceForge Content does not endorse or promote racism, bigotry, hatred, or physical harm of any kind against another group or individual, and does not discriminate, incite harassment or advocate harassment of any group or individual;

You know progrider has a repo, right? You can put your nigger videogames on the fossil repo.

"code of a destructive nature" - is a very vague term. For example, 'rm -rf' command could be possible very destructive. And the `shred` command is even more destructive, obstructing law enforcements from finding child porn evidence.

Why not host your own?
https://www.google.com/search?q=cheap+VPS
https://gitlab.com/

>>3
Does that mean I can't upload nuclear weapons systems management software onto github?

1. Encrypt all your code with the Caesar cipher https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesar_cipher
2. Don't mention that it's actually the Caesar cipher on your github page.
3. Don't mention which language your code is in.
4. ???
5. Freedom!

>>6
Even better would be a Caesar cipher that leaves reserved words and license agreements intact. That way you could have valid working code, and no one would be able to prove that by

if (ojhhfst) {
ojhhfst.upvohvf(nzBovt);
}

you actually meant

if (niggers) {
niggers.tongue(myAnus);
}

The user is free to choose whichever identifiers he wants, after all, isn't he?

>>4
Why not open your own grocery store? Why not start your own political part? Why not build your own house, instead of renting a room?

>>6
How would you share the code without sharing decryption method? And as soon as people get to know it, someone would likely get insulted or harassed by your code, then write a take down request to admins, threatening to sue or kill them and their cat.

>>5
Anything somebody may find "of a destructive nature".

Same I think would apply to ebola's genome.

gitgud.net

>>9
Decryption method is so obvious it doesn't need to be shared. As for people getting insulted, they will be insulted only by a deciphered version of your code, which is their initiative.

You see, the set of all ciphers is infinite, and for every nonempty piece of code there exist an infinite number of ciphers that change it into something offensive; requiring that users are responsible that no cipher turns their code into anything offensive is simply ridiculous - github would cease to exist. Thus you cannot be held accountable that somewhere there's a cipher that would turn your innocent code into something bad. After all, you did nothing to suggest that anyone should use a particular cipher on your code!

>>12

Decryption method is so obvious it doesn't need to be shared. As for people getting insulted, they will be insulted only by a deciphered version of your code, which is their initiative.

Compiling and running code would their initiative too.

>>12

you cannot be held accountable that somewhere there's a cipher that would turn your innocent code into something bad. After all, you did nothing to suggest that anyone should use a particular cipher on your code!

Doubt SJWs or github moderators would agree with that.

>>14
You can at least try it.

>>13
But that's not the problem, the problem is the source code amirite?

>>15
Usually source code is harmless, without compiling it first. So I can share source code for a virus, but to infect your PC with it would require invoking a compiler on it.

>>16
I can't see your point.

>>17
Point: encryption is useless in 99% of cases.

>>18
And?

>>19
?

>>20
OK.

Sad think is that there is no real difference between all these repository services:

https://code.google.com/projecthosting/policy.html

8. Malicious Products: Don't transmit viruses, malware or any other malicious or destructive code. We don't allow content that harms or interferes with the operation of the networks, servers, or other infrastructure of Google or any third-parties. However, we do allow projects that host open source malware code for security reasons, but not binary/downloadable modules.
1. Sexually Explicit Material: Do not post content that contains nudity, graphic sex acts, or sexually explicit material. Do not post content that drives traffic to commercial pornography sites.
2. Violent or Bullying Behavior: Do not post depictions of gratuitous violence. Do not threaten, harass or bully other users.
3. Hate Speech: Do not post content that promotes hatred or violence towards groups of people based on their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, or sexual orientation/gender identity.

https://help.launchpad.net/PrivacyPolicy

Launchpad ... delete data if required to do so by law or if data is inappropriate. Canonical reserves the right to determine whether data is inappropriate. Spam, malicious code, and defamation are considered inappropriate.

I.e. no repository would agree to host controversial material, because it is bad for politics and public relations. Implying that censorship is good for public relations. Fucking Jews.

DUBS

>>23
Your mouth was born to suck my kiss. From my anus.

>>4

https://www.google.com/search?q=cheap+VPS

All VPS have Terms of Service, which always disallow controversial material. Because you know, they don't want bad public image, DDoS attacks and lawsuits from offended people. Last thing any VPS wants is a widely circulated article in the vein of "<VPS_Name> are evil, because they refuse to take down <XYZ>"

https://gitlab.com/

Imagine something like "Gitlab.com hosts <XYZ> insulting our holy Lord! All good Christians/Muslims/Jews/Atheists, please boycott Gitlab.com". Gitlab.com will remove the offending content in no time.

>>25
here is typical VPS
http://www.gbservers.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/
What may NOT be hosted on our network:
– Info, tools or attempts related to hacking, phreaking, phishing, anarchy, virii or spam
– Racist content
– Proxy Servers
– Bots of any kind
– IRC Services including bouncers and egg drops

VPS guys surely hate anarchy

>>26
The fuck's wrong with IRC Services?

>>8
So is this your way of admitting that you feel entitled to have other people take the risk of hosting your speech for you, or are you really just so stupid as to think that the $100K plus cost of starting a grocery store is in any way comparable to the $50/M of renting a server?

>>25
Then get a dedicated server. TPB never seems to go down and they're constantly getting arrested. Or use the VPS to run a hidden service with on-the-fly encryption so the host never sees traffic go in or out in plaintext.

Imagine something like "Gitlab.com hosts <XYZ> insulting our holy Lord! All good Christians/Muslims/Jews/Atheists, please boycott Gitlab.com". Gitlab.com will remove the offending content in no time.

Are you fucking retarded? That's not a host, that's software that you run on your own server, that I recommended because I don't expect you to have the intelligence to do it with the terminal or to use Fossil.

>>26
I run several, and the only thing they really care about is you getting their IP addresses blacklisted as spam and DMCA (and presumably CP, but I'm not that much of a degenerate). The TOS is a cover-your-ass thing. And it's a simple matter of moving to a new one when you burn your bridges.

>>27
Frequently used as botnet controllers.

can't rely on other people to host your shit, host it yourself, you get booted from your ISP.

how did we get here /prog/ ;_;

>>28

Are you fucking retarded? That's not a host, that's software that you run on your own server, that I recommended because I don't expect you to have the intelligence to do it with the terminal or to use Fossil.

Actually, setting up a terminal daemon with a few cfg files is usually easier than automating GUI based monster.

the only thing they really care about is you getting their IP addresses blacklisted as spam and DMCA (and presumably CP, but I'm not that much of a degenerate).

DMCA is the least host should be afraid of. Compared to a crowd of angry muslims with improvised weapon.

Angering some political/religious group, may get company's CEO a pickaxe to the head:
http://www.theguardian.com/century/1940-1949/Story/0,,127350,00.html

>>29
Now I want to write a command and control bot that looks like it's asking for help understanding the c standard.

>>28

Or use the VPS to run a hidden service with on-the-fly encryption so the host never sees traffic go in or out in plaintext.

They have physical access to the machine so they can see what it's running.

>>29
Glass bottles are frequently used for molotov cocktails. Does that mean groceries shouldn't accept milk products bottled in glass containers?

>>31

Actually, setting up a terminal daemon with a few cfg files is usually easier than automating GUI based monster.

I was assuming that >>1-chan wanted his users to point and click too. You're right through, I didn't really think that one through.

DMCA is the least host should be afraid of. Compared to a crowd of angry muslims with improvised weapon.

Pick a host in Texas then. They seem to have good luck at stopping wannabee Jihadis, and they'll probably be happy to help you piss off mudslimes and women and gays.

>>33
I've never seen milk come in a glass bottle, actually. Only beer and pop. But yeah, if the grocery were liable whenever some made a Molotov cocktail or busted someone in the head with a bottle, I bet they would be leery about selling it too.

>>34
I've seen glass milk bottles on TV. Typically, it's sold by milkmans.

>>34
For example, Manhattan Milk Company sells elite milk in glass bottles:
http://homeidea.ru/index.php?topic=4427.0

heliohost took away the sqlite3 module.

>>33
There's a difference between the electronic world and the physical world. It's easy to anonymously do widespread damage with IRC botnets. It's not so easy to do widespread damage with a tray full of molotov cocktails.

>>38
You've got to be kidding me. A tray full of molotov cocktails can kill 10 people or destroy a store. An IRC botnet can only flip some bits that don't affect the real world.

DA INTANET IS DA REAL WOLD

INSTALL RICHARD GENTON

haha I bet u regret saying dat now dont u?