You must not transmit any worms or viruses or any code of a destructive nature. We may [...] remove Content and Accounts containing Content that we determine in our sole discretion are unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, pornographic, obscene or otherwise objectionable
When you create or make available your SourceForge Content on Sourceforge.net, you represent and warrant that: your SourceForge Content is not obscene, lewd, lascivious, excessively violent, harassing, libelous or slanderous, does not advocate the violent overthrow of the government of the United States, does not incite, encourage or threaten immediate physical harm against another; your SourceForge Content does not endorse or promote racism, bigotry, hatred, or physical harm of any kind against another group or individual, and does not discriminate, incite harassment or advocate harassment of any group or individual;
You know progrider has a repo, right? You can put your nigger videogames on the fossil repo.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-18 16:47
"code of a destructive nature" - is a very vague term. For example, 'rm -rf' command could be possible very destructive. And the `shred` command is even more destructive, obstructing law enforcements from finding child porn evidence.
>>3 Does that mean I can't upload nuclear weapons systems management software onto github?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-18 16:54
1. Encrypt all your code with the Caesar cipher https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesar_cipher 2. Don't mention that it's actually the Caesar cipher on your github page. 3. Don't mention which language your code is in. 4. ??? 5. Freedom!
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-18 17:11
>>6 Even better would be a Caesar cipher that leaves reserved words and license agreements intact. That way you could have valid working code, and no one would be able to prove that by
if (ojhhfst) { ojhhfst.upvohvf(nzBovt); }
you actually meant
if (niggers) { niggers.tongue(myAnus); }
The user is free to choose whichever identifiers he wants, after all, isn't he?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-18 17:33
>>4 Why not open your own grocery store? Why not start your own political part? Why not build your own house, instead of renting a room?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-18 17:39
>>6 How would you share the code without sharing decryption method? And as soon as people get to know it, someone would likely get insulted or harassed by your code, then write a take down request to admins, threatening to sue or kill them and their cat.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-18 17:41
>>5 Anything somebody may find "of a destructive nature".
>>9 Decryption method is so obvious it doesn't need to be shared. As for people getting insulted, they will be insulted only by a deciphered version of your code, which is their initiative.
You see, the set of all ciphers is infinite, and for every nonempty piece of code there exist an infinite number of ciphers that change it into something offensive; requiring that users are responsible that no cipher turns their code into anything offensive is simply ridiculous - github would cease to exist. Thus you cannot be held accountable that somewhere there's a cipher that would turn your innocent code into something bad. After all, you did nothing to suggest that anyone should use a particular cipher on your code!
Decryption method is so obvious it doesn't need to be shared. As for people getting insulted, they will be insulted only by a deciphered version of your code, which is their initiative.
Compiling and running code would their initiative too.
you cannot be held accountable that somewhere there's a cipher that would turn your innocent code into something bad. After all, you did nothing to suggest that anyone should use a particular cipher on your code!
Doubt SJWs or github moderators would agree with that.
>>13 But that's not the problem, the problem is the source code amirite?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-18 18:20
>>15 Usually source code is harmless, without compiling it first. So I can share source code for a virus, but to infect your PC with it would require invoking a compiler on it.
8. Malicious Products: Don't transmit viruses, malware or any other malicious or destructive code. We don't allow content that harms or interferes with the operation of the networks, servers, or other infrastructure of Google or any third-parties. However, we do allow projects that host open source malware code for security reasons, but not binary/downloadable modules. 1. Sexually Explicit Material: Do not post content that contains nudity, graphic sex acts, or sexually explicit material. Do not post content that drives traffic to commercial pornography sites. 2. Violent or Bullying Behavior: Do not post depictions of gratuitous violence. Do not threaten, harass or bully other users. 3. Hate Speech: Do not post content that promotes hatred or violence towards groups of people based on their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, or sexual orientation/gender identity.
Launchpad ... delete data if required to do so by law or if data is inappropriate. Canonical reserves the right to determine whether data is inappropriate. Spam, malicious code, and defamation are considered inappropriate.
I.e. no repository would agree to host controversial material, because it is bad for politics and public relations. Implying that censorship is good for public relations. Fucking Jews.
All VPS have Terms of Service, which always disallow controversial material. Because you know, they don't want bad public image, DDoS attacks and lawsuits from offended people. Last thing any VPS wants is a widely circulated article in the vein of "<VPS_Name> are evil, because they refuse to take down <XYZ>"
Imagine something like "Gitlab.com hosts <XYZ> insulting our holy Lord! All good Christians/Muslims/Jews/Atheists, please boycott Gitlab.com". Gitlab.com will remove the offending content in no time.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-18 19:47
>>25 here is typical VPS http://www.gbservers.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/ What may NOT be hosted on our network: – Info, tools or attempts related to hacking, phreaking, phishing, anarchy, virii or spam – Racist content – Proxy Servers – Bots of any kind – IRC Services including bouncers and egg drops
>>8 So is this your way of admitting that you feel entitled to have other people take the risk of hosting your speech for you, or are you really just so stupid as to think that the $100K plus cost of starting a grocery store is in any way comparable to the $50/M of renting a server?
>>25 Then get a dedicated server. TPB never seems to go down and they're constantly getting arrested. Or use the VPS to run a hidden service with on-the-fly encryption so the host never sees traffic go in or out in plaintext.
Imagine something like "Gitlab.com hosts <XYZ> insulting our holy Lord! All good Christians/Muslims/Jews/Atheists, please boycott Gitlab.com". Gitlab.com will remove the offending content in no time.
Are you fucking retarded? That's not a host, that's software that you run on your own server, that I recommended because I don't expect you to have the intelligence to do it with the terminal or to use Fossil.
>>26 I run several, and the only thing they really care about is you getting their IP addresses blacklisted as spam and DMCA (and presumably CP, but I'm not that much of a degenerate). The TOS is a cover-your-ass thing. And it's a simple matter of moving to a new one when you burn your bridges.
Are you fucking retarded? That's not a host, that's software that you run on your own server, that I recommended because I don't expect you to have the intelligence to do it with the terminal or to use Fossil.
Actually, setting up a terminal daemon with a few cfg files is usually easier than automating GUI based monster.
the only thing they really care about is you getting their IP addresses blacklisted as spam and DMCA (and presumably CP, but I'm not that much of a degenerate).
DMCA is the least host should be afraid of. Compared to a crowd of angry muslims with improvised weapon.
Actually, setting up a terminal daemon with a few cfg files is usually easier than automating GUI based monster.
I was assuming that >>1-chan wanted his users to point and click too. You're right through, I didn't really think that one through.
DMCA is the least host should be afraid of. Compared to a crowd of angry muslims with improvised weapon.
Pick a host in Texas then. They seem to have good luck at stopping wannabee Jihadis, and they'll probably be happy to help you piss off mudslimes and women and gays.
>>33 I've never seen milk come in a glass bottle, actually. Only beer and pop. But yeah, if the grocery were liable whenever some made a Molotov cocktail or busted someone in the head with a bottle, I bet they would be leery about selling it too.
>>33 There's a difference between the electronic world and the physical world. It's easy to anonymously do widespread damage with IRC botnets. It's not so easy to do widespread damage with a tray full of molotov cocktails.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 9:46
>>38 You've got to be kidding me. A tray full of molotov cocktails can kill 10 people or destroy a store. An IRC botnet can only flip some bits that don't affect the real world.
I don't know if they're still doing it but I've seen some VN translation teams using Github before. That's a bad idea for a number of other reasons but no one seemed to care.
>>39 IRC botnet can DDoS amazon or ebay, doing millions in damages, while average human life costs just around hundred thousands bucks. In Russia human life costs even less. In China it costs nothing.
how much is deadly poison worth when you can just walk outside and collect it?
there's no damage in amazon or ebay going down, literally. no damage. it's like saying you're causing death by not having sex and having the children you wanted to have. >>51's probably the cunt who liked it when I asked him who the market winner of 2015 would be
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 15:31
by the way, once you ingest deadly poison, do you think it will go away if you're rich? that it will decide not to destroy your body if you offer it a large enough sum of money?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 15:32
maybe if you offer the poison 10 million dollars, it will spare your life. hahaha
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 15:35
>>56 That is american white male middle-class life. Female NEET nigger would cost far less. Same nigger in Africa would cost just the amount of meat it carries on its bones.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 15:39
it's like you're saying it causes 'real world' damage, when all it damages is the expectation that certain people had of business that would have been conducted.
but it's those expectations, when people depend on them, that their suffering stems from. building their lives on wobbly foundations. instead of rooting their minds within themselves, they're far, far out.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 15:54
>>62 Agreed. The damage done to some fictitious financial derivative is fictitious2. Only real goods and services matter in the end, and that is what should be the most valuable anyway, not some crooked financial schemes designed to estrange results of material labor.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 15:55
>>62 If Amazon gets down near christmess, damages would be pretty real, to both expected sales and kids being left without presents. A huge parenting issue. Child abuse at least.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 15:57
>>64 It won't get down because of a botnet hosted on VPN and controlled via IRC. They have DDOS protection. It would take half the China cyberarmy to pull that off.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 15:57
it saddens me to think there's people who would put a price on their lives. they've been beaten into this small box and there's no escape out of that box for them. their body rots in atrophy and that 8 million dollars their life's seems more and more appealing as the days go by.
but you're worth infinitely more than that. your mind is so powerful that it can obliterate the entire concept of value. but they don't realise that. it's like you grow up in captivity, and you don't know any better than that. you know no better than being a slave, just another cog in the system. but it's so easy to drop out, if you just make that change in your mind
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 16:01
>>66 That is the first yoke of the kikes: make people think of everything in terms of money, reduce their model of the world to a primitive one-dimensional LESS MUNEY-MOAR MONEY axis. Yes, it is easy to cut that rope, but that would cause the natural desire to several other yokes, and most people don't have the willpower to start. They prefer to sleepily, safely drift on in the consumerist slavepen that their kike overlords built for them.
This will also spell the end for the Western society. Money-driven people can live more or less peacefully when there's a lot of money to go around (though lately there hasn't been, just witness the black riots that shook USA recently), but once things stop being so comfy and climate-controlled, it will all break down. Moneyfags don't have a concept of patriotism, of duty, of humanity.
They are animals wearing expensive brand clothes and riding in beautiful cars - uneducated, unworthy, lowly animals that will start marauding and cannibalizing when the the hand that feeds stops being so plentiful.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 16:12
>>63 do goods and services matter though? if you're starving, then obviously any kind of energy/protein is valuable to you. but if you already have an abundance, you probably don't want even more. well, maybe you might, but that's just a result of the kind of mentality I'm criticising, people like having lots of stupid stuff.
but how about a can of coca cola? for some it's a delicious treat, totally worth some money! for others, it's a poison that slowly makes them more and more obese, you'd have to pay these people to get them to take what you're selling. people breaking their 'addiction' to sugar. either their addiction breaks or they do. is their mind stronger than all the advertising, the sugar, and all that other bullshit, or not? the answer lies in their physique.
you can put value on not having something, and that's easy if you're generally pretty suspicious about people and things. some people here would pay to not have a device that they believe acts as a medium through which the Jews spy on them. but some people don't have that belief, and they would pay to have such a device.
I can walk through a shopping centre nowadays, with one item in mind, go through many stores, and leave empty-handed because I did not find the item I was seeking. I had difficulty doing that a while ago, because I let all the advertising and shit tell me what was valuable, instead of focusing on what was valuable in my mind.
1% of Americans possesses as much wealth as the others combined. I think we can safely ignore the interests and opinions for the sake of the other 99% who do not have abundance of material wealth.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 16:20
>>67 kind of sucks to fall into the trap of anxiety though. "every single jew, including richard stallman, gerald sussman, and bobby fischer, are trying to manipulate me to a common end". you can prove that they are, you can prove that they aren't. if you can do one, but not the other, you should really try doing the other. even just as an exercise in using your mind effectively.
there's a lot you can learn from people, you know? there's this tendency to think you're part of some cult and there's a few 'enlightened' people and everyone else is a total fucking idiot. but get to know those 'idiots', whoever you perceive them to be, and I guarantee there's something you can learn from them.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 16:23
>>71 will have enough food and water than you need to survive tomorrow?
think about what you need, not how you 'measure up' to other people.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 16:31
>>71 there's few things you actually *need* in your life. you decide the rest. a car, a house, drugs, clothes, good friends, art work, etc. I'm not saying any of these are bad, I don't do that good/bad shit, I'm just saying you can benefit from recognising that these things shouldn't control you, you shouldn't become attached to them. you enjoy those things better if you don't, you become more thankful for having those things in your life :)
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 16:32
>>70 This is just weak. Try to go 5 days without water, you'll see how powerful your mind is at putting values on things.
>>72 Stop thinking of Jews as if they have a hivemind. There are plenty of simpletons and normal-Joes among them. But the Rothschild-grade kikes are like that, and they're in control of what people in the West think.
>>73 A billion people in the world don't have access even to clean drinking water, genius.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 16:34
I'm just writing these posts 'cause it's like pulling ants out of a colony and putting them in the cheese factory. it's a weird game but I'll take a break for now
It's about who owns the non-real sector of economy,
Chase and Wells Fargo are about as non-real as it gets. A dark unknown figure pulling the strings of giganormous financial institutions (controlled by white christian men) is beyond retarded and I can't possibly take such a claim seriously.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 16:54
>>79 A lot of them are Jews, a few atheists and a few females to make up for quotas. Obama is, again, not your typical street gangsta nigger.
A lot of who? Check it out, the CEOs of the largest financial institutions: Berkshire Hathaway - Warren Buffett - Presbyterian JP Morgan Chase - Jamie Dimon - Orthodox Christian Bank of America - Brian Thomas Moynihan - Catholic Wells Fargo - John G. Stumpf - Catholic Citigroup - Michael Corbat - Catholic
Name:
sage2015-06-19 17:15
DA FUCK happened here today
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 17:17
>>83 A. Buffett is a self-described agnostic, not a Presbyterian. B. He's extremely friendly with Jews and has invested billions of dollars in them. He's probably a crypto-Jew.
Further, Buffett said his "hero and the man who made me an investment success" was Ben Graham. Graham, along with Newman's father, Jerry, ran a New York fund called Graham-Newman Corp.
"After besieging Ben for the three years after I received my degree from Columbia, Ben and Jerry finally hired me," Buffett said. "I was the first gentile ever employed by the firm -- including secretaries -- in its 18 years of existence. My first son bears the middle name Graham after Ben."
Talk about few Jews in the non-real economic sector, yeah. It's made up almost exclusively of them.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 17:23
"After besieging Ben for the three years after I received my degree from Columbia, Ben and Jerry finally hired me," Buffett said. "I was the first gentile ever employed by the firm -- including secretaries
Now that's real discrimination, but you won't hear the warriors for "people of color" scream about it.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 17:26
Oh shit an ice cream company is controlled by jews and employs mostly jews this changes everything
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 18:00
>>88 It was an investment fund. And they employed only Jews, for 18 years. Not mostly Jews, not 80% Jews, only Jews. And they refused to hire a goy for 3 years before giving in.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 18:19
>>89 That is a private company, so they can hire whoever they like. It is just that they will get reputation of biased investments. I.e. if you invest into them, your money could be invested into some holocaust museum, which is not the show that would produce much profit.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 18:21
>>90 So why is it that private companies hiring mostly whites become targets of anti-racist scandals while Jews hiring only Jews are doing well and comfortable?
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 18:30
>>91 Because government has too much power and can dictate private enterprises, whom they should hire.
Same problem as with being unable to fire pregnant female or with company refusing to hire a nigger, because of his criminal past.
This only makes things worse for the nigger or female, because that way company cant clearly explain the nigger why they wont hire him and would have to waste time. In the case of female, company would have to use sneaky and evil methods to get rid of her, damaging her reputation and personality.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 18:38
>>92 But why are the Jewish companies exempt from those responsibilities? Why can they refuse to hire a nigger just because he's a nigger, and a non-Jew woman just because she is not a Jew, and no one will make a fuss?
What if a company made a point to hire only Christians, wouldn't that company receive awful publicity and have problems with the law?
But why are the Jewish companies exempt from those responsibilities?
Probably not nowadays. Buffett's anecdote dates back to when he "recieved [his] degrees from Columbia", which must be a bazillion years ago. Well before affirmative action was even a thing, that's for sure.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 19:34
>>93 As >>94 says, back then government was a look weaker and laws very a lot more liberal. But due to USSR funding of american commies, America had to implement a lot of socialist laws itself, so now you got these niggers on welfare.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-19 19:36
>>95 Don't forget to eat tinfoil, you wouldn't want russian satellites to know your diet of instant noodles so they can poison you. Make sure you chew it well.
This is just weak. Try to go 5 days without water, you'll see how powerful your mind is at putting values on things.
Any kind of survival anxiety will show you what is important in your life. That's a good point.
A billion people in the world don't have access even to clean drinking water, genius.
You do, though.
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-20 2:54
>>1 Get Gitlab and host it yourself. There's even services that do it for you for a nominal fee. But if you have problems with something like the TOS of code hosting services, then I doubt you are up to any good.
Without being pointed to specifics, I'm not sure what part of your repository you believe might be controversial. However, if we were to receive a complaint regarding the content, we would need to investigate and respond according to our policies, which would include notifying you with more details about the specifics and how you might be able to correct it."
I saved a copy of the russian suicide.txt. I'm refraining from posting it because then russian posters might not be able to access the site anymore. Does anyone have a link to the english translation. I remember it being really funny.
RosComRooster doesn't really block many sites unless they have to do with politics. For example, they blocked xhamster for being porn, but didn't block redtube. Besides, the blocks are sidesteppable using VPN.
I saved a copy of the russian suicide.txt. I'm refraining from posting it because then russian posters might not be able to access the site anymore.
Share, please. It'd be awesome to block russians from participating in any community I want, just by posting it and reporting the website to their internet authority.
anyone got a list of github type sites? loanyone got a list of github type sites? looking to moveoking to moveanyone got a list of github type sites? looking to moveanyone got a list of github type sites? looking to moveanyone got a list of github type sites? looking to move
anyone got a list of github type sites? loanyone got a list of github type sites? looking to moveoking to moveanyone got a list of github type sites? looking to moveanyone got a list of github type sites? looking to moveanyone got a list of github type sites? looking to move
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-24 4:05
Someone needs to register bitchbucket.org
Name:
Anonymous2015-06-24 6:14
admin-sama, look out! WHOIS protection might go away!
