Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

mentifex dev blog

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-28 18:02

http://www.advogato.org/person/mentifex/diary.html?start=47

However, we know why the AI got stuck in a rut. It was able to answer the query "who are you" with "I AM ANDRU", but it did not know anything further to say about ANDRU, so it repeated "ANDRU AM ANDRU". Immediately it made us want to improve upon the BeVerb module, so that the AI will endlessly repeat "ANDRU IS ANDRU" instead of "ANDRU AM ANDRU".

Then it dawned on us. The Moving Wave automatically leaves the cresting, final concept active. No Werwolf mechanism is necessary. If we want to avoid the repetition-chanting of "ANDRU IS ANDRU", we have to make the "qutop" query-topic have a resuscitand activation of, say, forty (40), so that it will be higher in activation than the level of thirty-six (36) typically left on the final, cresting concept in a sentence of normal thought. So we comment out the old setting of "16" for "qutop" in the WhoPlex code as shown below, and we use a value of "40".

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-28 18:31

Sorry Mentifux, Google already bet ANDRU at his own game.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.05869v2.pdf
ANDRU can only say his name, while this one can fix your computer and talk about philosophy. It's also the first AI to be a Christian.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-28 21:19

>>2
ANDRU can already do all that. He just chooses to not express it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-29 1:10

>>3
You should make ANDRU express this. An AI bot that only says its own name is pretty useless.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-29 1:22

Most "AI" chat bots are nothing more than the programmer adding a bunch of conditional branches and pre-writing answers to questions they anticipate that users will ask. They don't "think" and they're not "intelligent" so much as they are reading off a script, basically.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-29 1:56

>>5
Most "human" being are nothing more than the evolution adding a bunch of conditional branches and pre-writing answers to questions it anticipates that environment will ask. They don't "think" and they're not "intelligent" so much as they are reading off a script, basically.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-29 2:10

>>2
You can't do any conversation, without spatial memory and tracking context. It would be very easy to confuse such program by asking about past and future events inside of conversation or just asking it to describe an ASCII art.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-29 2:13

And it can't be used for video games either, because that would require associating the word "car" with ingame model of a car. Then games like GTA have a lot of cars, so an AI roleplaying a nigger would have to guess which car has to be stolen.

Name: MSOC 2015-06-29 5:02

Mentifex Summer of Code: Growing Pains of the Strong AI

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.lang.lisp/-H-7plQIoew/EutwiSmzQL8J

As a Charter Member (along with Dr. Tim Bradshaw) of the

http://devrel.zoomquiet.io/data/20080926113320/index.html

Mad People of comp.lang.lisp, I feel indentured to
put some teeth into an announcement about MSOC --
the Mentifex Summer of Code dealing with Strong AI.

Gaining a Lisp implementation of the AI Minds
thus far coded in four programming languages is
a slow and difficult process. Previous Minds are

http://mind.sourceforge.net/mindrexx.html in REXX;

http://www.nlg-wiki.org/systems/Mind.Forth in English;

http://www.nlg-wiki.org/systems/Wotan in German;

http://www.nlg-wiki.org/systems/Mind in JavaScript;

http://www.nlg-wiki.org/systems/Dushka in Russian

http://ai.neocities.org/perlmind.txt -- incipient.

But in this month of June 2015 the JavaScript

http://ai.neocities.org/AiMind.html has matured

into an almost bugfree Strong AI of fun to code.
It is a fascinating process of watching the
AI perform, and then to fix tiny little glitches.

Oftentimes I must consult the Forth code in
English and German, or the JavaScript code
in Russian, to make sure that a problem has
not already been solved, or to search for a
way of approaching a problem.

It shocks me sometimes to realize that I am
designing a Mind while I code the AI.

I have been day-dreaming that soon there
will be jobs for Lisp AI coders and Forth coders
working as AI Mind maintainers in each language.

Only a bugfree AI will spread across the Web
and be adopted by in-house AI shops at major
corporations and university laboratories.

The Mentifex AI Minds are getting there --
almost bugfree. But troubleshooting AI is not
for Joe Appcoder or Joe Ivy or Joe Sixpack.

It's a steep learning curve to observe
artificial intelligence and be able to
improvise fixes to subtle AI problems.

Even if we have a bugfree bulletproof AI
during the MSOC, Mentifex Summer of Code
will fade into oblivion as the Strong AI
Minds expand corifugally into new cyborg
functionalities and shifting paradigms.

When a Lisp AI shop or other shop somewhere
is tasked with adding new AI functionality,
new bugs and Lisp-maddening glitches will
creep into the Strong AI codebase never
at rest. Lisp AI coding jobs gone mad!
New H1B visa applicants will arrive for
you to train in how to do your job under
pain of not being allowed severance pay.
But briefly you will shine with Lisp AI.

Cheers and congratulations,

Arthur
--
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00FKJY1WY
http://mind.sourceforge.net/lisp.html
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=307824.307853
http://aihub.net/artificial-intelligence-lab-projects

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-29 13:06

>>9
Uhg. You aren't smart man.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-29 13:36

>>9
bro you need to move your shit off source forge asap

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-29 14:46

>>9
Hello Mentifex,
I must inform you that I cannot help you with your endeavors as I have visible abdominal muscles. I hope you find the overweight LISP developers that you need.
Yours truly,
Joe Sixpack

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-29 17:04

>>9
http://devrel.zoomquiet.io/data/20080926113320/index.html -> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!msg/comp.lang.lisp/3ExXYHxWRRQ/_IGbOEaAnWgJ
Wow, comp.lang.lisp got the shit trolled out of them by Ilias.
you have confused me. [<br>] i've requested an explanation based on apples. [<br>]to cleanup my mind.
Then the chink wacko from that list tries his hand at a poetic explaination:
concur i concede, however, i'm not done: [<br>] 1 + 1 = 2 [<br>] but [<br>] dick + pussy = union [<br>] explain you me, please [<br>] the fantastic stupidity of your fantastically moronic question and fantastic idiocy.
tdavis is pretty sane, relatively speaking.

But in this month of June 2015 the JavaScript http://ai.neocities.org/AiMind.html has matured into an almost bugfree Strong AI of fun to code.
I don't think I've ever gotten that thing to work. The one time I almost did, it was just I ARE ERROR over and over again.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-29 21:24

>>13
It used to spout seemingly random shit when diagnostics was enabled, now everything remains hopelessly static. I don't even know if anything is recieving my inputs on the back.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-29 23:45

diagnose my anus

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List