/prog/ - Which Scheme implementation should I use?

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 1:45

Racket?

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 1:47

Racket

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 2:55

Racket is shit

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 3:34

Racket is not a Scheme.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 3:59

javascript is the only language anyone needs to learn

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 4:26

javascript is lisp, not scheme

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 7:07

JavaScript

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 9:30

guile

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 11:16

S. Seven. Scheme.

It is fast. It is tested. And it is good.

This is genuine advice.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 14:04

im literally afraid to tell you guys about the scheme i use incase i somehow have to deal with you in irc

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 15:17

GNU/Dubs

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 19:21

I've been using gambit recently, haven't found any issues so far.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 19:51

For a toy language, choice of implementation is not so important.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 20:35

>>13
epic xDDDDDDDDDD

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 20:44

use elm

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 20:45

>>15
Use correct spelling and punctuation.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 20:56

>>4 is correct, racket is a qt lisp though :3

both gambit and chicken are qt r5rs implementations :3

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 21:01

>>17
why use r5rs when r7rs exists?

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 21:24

>>18
I'm still waiting for r7rs large.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 21:32

there is no need for "large"

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 21:46

There is no need for "Scheme".

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 22:13

There is always a need for "check em".

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-05 21:05

So, guile, s7, gambit, or chicken? Are they all essentially identical?

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-05 21:33

Lisp is shit

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-05 23:33

>>24
you're post is shit

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-06 11:14

don't use a meme language you will only cockblock yourself

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-06 11:44

>>26
trying so hard

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-06 13:33

>>27
and got so far. but in the end, it doesn't even matter.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-09 8:46

>>26
Why worry about being cockblocked when you can be raped by thousands of parentheses?

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-12 2:59

>>29
Why not both?

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-12 6:01

>>28
this is the end

Which Scheme implementation should I use?

1 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 1:45

2 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 1:47

3 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 2:55

4 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 3:34

5 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 3:59

6 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 4:26

7 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 7:07

8 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 9:30

9 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 11:16

10 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 14:04

11 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 15:17

12 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 19:21

13 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 19:51

14 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 20:35

15 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 20:44

16 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 20:45

17 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 20:56

18 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 21:01

19 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 21:24

20 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 21:32

21 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 21:46

22 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 22:13

23 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-05 21:05

24 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-05 21:33

25 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-05 23:33

26 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-06 11:14

27 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-06 11:44

28 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-06 13:33

29 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-09 8:46

30 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-12 2:59

31 Name: Anonymous 2015-07-12 6:01