Coping up with useless bullshit is something you'll have to do in most programming jobs anyway. Testing that skill beforehand is okay.
Name:
Anonymous2015-08-13 23:55
I don't understand why I should have to code a fizzbuzz in order to get a job. I'm a damn good programmer, but it has nothing to do with my ability to complete these useless tasks. I can code in 10 different languages and have written over 500 ruby programs. This is nothing more than the white man trying to keep us females out of the industry.
As a girl I prefer to work on the intersection between code and law as well as usability, social issues and open source (follow me on github!). Asking me to code a "fizz buzz" is patronizing and sexist.
>>8 you lose. stop trolling. Or don't. Keep trolling and losing, making a fool of yourself, do it a million times and I will identify, stand up to and challenge your trolling and humiliate you.
It's up to you.
Name:
Anonymous2015-08-14 8:53
nope, my sexist misogynist little friend. that's all because of men's superior physical strength which is not "earned", it is genetic.
"SJW"? so you are not in favour of social justice?
Name:
Anonymous2015-08-14 9:00
Did I the dubs achieve?
Name:
Anonymous2015-08-14 9:01
>>11 you are not describing anyone. you have just lost every argument, posted abusive sexist gibberish in the wrong place, humiliated yourself, and are now just spouting more sexist insulting gibberish. you are a troll. stop trolling.
Name:
Anonymous2015-08-14 9:08
The fact that there's is a Women's Chess Champion title just confirms that women are intellectually inferior to men.
Is sex change surgery a homeomorphism? Does the inverse map have discontinuities?
Name:
Anonymous2015-08-14 10:53
>>15 It involves stitching, so I doubt it's even continuous.
Name:
Anonymous2015-08-16 20:10
>>10 First define "social justice", then we might have something to talk about. SJWs don't bother explaining what they think justice is, because they're not fighting for justice, they're fighting for negroes/women/retards/etc.
Name:
Anonymous2015-08-17 12:49
>>17 They're not fighting "for" anything. They only "fight" against everything.
>>17 It's funny you mention that considering ``SJWs'' is a term co-opted as a peyorative, SJWs don't really call themselves SJWs. Regardless, a definition of social justice is readily available and is not particularly hard to find.
Social justice is a philosophical, political, social, and legal movement in support of the rights of those who are marginalised, chiefly by poverty, but also (and increasingly) those who lack social privilege at any intersection.
>>13 It does not. "The fact that A confirms B", without having demonstrated that also "A -> B" is a fact, does not imply that "B" is a fact.
>>17,18 IMHO, SWJ ideology is like Anarchy (or any other ideology): Appealing to idiots. If you focus on the idiots you won't get anything out of it.
>>19 I'm tired of your definitions. Either you understand or you don't, and if you do, there's no need to (constantly) clarify, it obstructs the discussion.
Name:
Anonymous2015-08-17 18:23
I wish you fucking retards would shut the fuck up about ``SJW''s. Do you not have anything else to bitch about?
IN MY HUMBLE TRUTH, Libertarianism ideology is like Communism (or any other ideology): Appealing to idiots. If you focus on the idiots you won't get anything out of it.
This is nothing more than the white man trying to keep us females out of the industry.
While I don't deny that women are unfairly discriminated against in the technology/software industry, I don't think this is an example of that. After all, EVERYONE, male or female, is required to do fizzbuzzes. Of course, if they're judging women more harshly then men on these tests, that definitely is an example of sexism. But basically, if your job involves any kind of programming at all, you should at least be able to demonstrate the ability to do fizzbuzz. It's a lot simpler conceptually than say implementing quicksort, or even traversing a binary tree.