Elixir: What Erlang should have been. Perl 6: The HURD of dynamically typed languages. Idris: Yet another dependently typed language with Haskell-like syntax.
Elixir isn't bad and improves in some areas, but no. It brings on some poor Rubyisms.
Perl 6: The HURD of dynamically typed languages.
*Gradually typed programming languages. You're getting at development time and adoption, right? Can't argue, wish it wasn't so. At least its devout religious freak figurehead doesn't harass people for their beliefs.
Idris: Yet another dependently typed language with Haskell-like syntax.
There might be a reason for that. At least it isn't actually Haskell, which is starting to feel like the PHP of pure functional languages.
Haskell, which is starting to feel like the PHP of pure functional languages.
explain?
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-25 22:40
ELIXIR = PERL 6 = IDRIS = SAME DOG SHIT
REAL PROGRAMERS WHO ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT THEY AR DOING USE ASSEMBLY. IF U DONT KNO ASSEMBLY U DONT KNOW ANYTING ABOUT PROGRAMMING OR ABOUT ANYTHING. SO PLEASE STOP CALLING URSELF A PROGRAMMER IF U NEED TO USE HIGH LEVEL TOYS AND GO RED DA ARCHITECTURES SOFTWARE DEVELOPER MANUALS
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-25 23:33
>>8 To quote Bjarne, ``There are only two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about and the ones nobody uses.''
>>8 It's hodge-podgey and getting worse in that regard. Haskell is a fine language, but imagine if Idris had to more-or-less support Haskell's idiosyncrasies, only to have some new extension come a long and take a good long piss in its cornflakes.
>>9 I don't mind High level languages as a means, but it's the fact that it's easier to get into, means more casual programmers arise from schools who have no fucking clue about writing efficiently.
I'm well aware of my myself that I need to read some books about it, but at least I'm not using drag and drop for everything.
>>8 Haskell is ``a fractal of bad design''. It's still better than Java, Go, Rust, or OCaml.
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-27 18:31
>>17 Haskell was never meant to be a good language, it was a sandbox for functional programmers to play in. Hence the dozens of language extensions created on-demand by the community.
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-28 9:14
>>3 Do they understand that this license would not be recognized or upheld under most jurisdictions?
>>19 he's a little white punk boy, he's doing it for sjw cuck points. same as hannes the ocaml cuck.
Name:
Jesus ``The Lord'' Christ2015-09-28 10:30
I use my own version of LISP when I made the World fallen
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-28 14:25
>>20 Haha, I understood that cuck reference! +1 for the 4chan meme ;)
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-29 3:50
>>10 I don't buy that argue for one second. Obviously, it coming from someone who markets his own very popular, niche language. Why wouldn't a salesman stretch the truth? Hell, he even restates his belief that "there's a smaller, cleaner C++ trying to come out."
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-29 3:53
The best thing about idris is that it's not quite plagued by that 'kmettly transmitted disease currently known as lens.
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-29 15:42
>>24 I refuse to use any Haskell library or program that depends on lens.
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-05 23:04
>>24,25 The idea behind lens (functional references) isn't even that bad, the library is just horribly overengineered. Who needs garbage like Iso?
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-06 6:41
What's /frog/ opinion on all these new languages like for instance: