>>62 No, I'm not mad about things happening in your dreams.
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-15 17:44
Haskell is snake oil.
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-16 10:48
We need to get computers to do more (or even the same), but by telling them less.
Expanding programming languages to force the user to dump more info into it is exactly backwards. Computers are effectively getting dumber as a result.
>>66 by the amount of the combined length of all nigger dicks to ever exist they can comprehend.
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-29 3:12
Haskell is turdware.
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-29 18:06
Haskell is a girl!
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-29 18:25
Haskell is a dead dog!
Name:
Anonymous2015-10-29 20:10
LOL look at those Haskell idiots and laugh. They can't even keep track of what is a list and what is a tuple, so instead of
length ('a', 'b')
they propose
safeLength (Proxy :: Proxy [Char]) ('a', 'b')
all of that to fucking make sure that they don't call length on a tuple. Nice save, Haskell! I feel so safe knowing that I'll never confuse a list with a tuple. I mean, that's the hardest to spot and most devious error every programmer makes, a real codebase-killer that one.
>>75 So funny how they have to split their posts into about 10 tweets and clutter them with the @bullshit @things. Who in their right mind would use a textboard with a 140 symbol limit? With half the screen width wasted, too. Why are reasonable grown men using an obviously inferior web service and not leaving for more appropriate communication venues? Why is Twitter even a thing? It's shit yet everyone makes it a point to squash their own balls into this 140-symbol blender?