Can't you read? It's mocking the idea of needing ``female contributors'' to meet some quota.
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-19 17:23
Why are you poking fun at them being Marxists? It's cute. They're baby egoists who have not read enough Stirner yet to know what they're talking about.
Why do you all care about the programmers' point of view regarding politics?
As long as the software is good, I just think ``fuck it''.
Suckless software is, most times, far above average. Even great in some cases. That's enough for me. I don't give a shit about what the guys programming it think about social stuff. Also, suckless is big and people in it think in many different ways. You can't generalize.
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-19 18:56
e/g/in thread XD bumping!!
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-19 20:40
>>10 Because they discriminate contributors based on their sex.
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-20 2:26
>>12 A lot of open source projects are already virgin-only, I don't see a problem with formalizing that.
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-20 4:45
>>1 Can't you just pass your work to a `female' and let her hand it in? ;_; please read me
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-20 10:50
old-school Marxists
No, they support Stalin and Mao.
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-20 15:05
>>12 hi that is a very interesting claim I would like to see a citation for it so that I can decide for myself if it is true or not, thank you
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-20 15:47
>>1 Satire is the lowest form of comedy and the lowest form of wit.
Name:
Anonymous2015-12-20 18:40
If Stirner was a programmer, he would've used Lisp.