/prog/ - /prog/more — Tinychan BBS

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 17:51

lets make our own version of suckmore but wthout the C fanboyism.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 17:53

I'm all for this, why don't we use ML instead?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 18:05

>>2
Scheme is really the only choice.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 18:20

Just use Common Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 18:23

Cum on Lisp.

Name: hojad !OUKY5mcbp6 2016-01-17 18:47

well definitely a lisp

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 18:48

>>2
ML is great but maybe we should consider implementing a language in assembly first.

minimal deps, keep the codebase tiny. stuff like that.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 19:03

>>7
Then FORTH is the way to go.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:46

>>8
im not sure, I tried making a little forth myself based on jones tutoral. It's difficult but there is some beauty to the language. On the other hand it seems impossible to program in.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:59

Sounds like fun. Where do I sign up?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 21:53

>>10
Why, between these beautifully identical digits, of course.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:19

No matter the language, if you're following a Unix design it will be shit.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 1:04

>>12
we're free of that shit

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 1:41

>>7
You don't need to start at the bottom. Start with the language you want and build both up & down.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 12:14

>>14
but there isn't a really good language like that

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 13:31

>>2

I'm all for this, why don't we use ML instead?

Good idea, we could nail our 69 theses on the Church door.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 19:34

>>15
Do you even Lisp, bro?

/prog/more

1 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 17:51

2 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 17:53

3 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 18:05

4 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 18:20

5 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 18:23

6 Name: hojad !OUKY5mcbp6 2016-01-17 18:47

7 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 18:48

8 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 19:03

9 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:46

10 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 20:59

11 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 21:53

12 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:19

13 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 1:04

14 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 1:41

15 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 12:14

16 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 13:31

17 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-18 19:34