/prog/ - dom element for every quad XD

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-27 18:06

http://www.voxelcss.com/

this just proves popularity has nothing to do with how good something is or how useful it is

what the actual fuck is the formula for pleasing the masses of meme coders

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-27 18:53

>>1
user-friendly everything. Programmers are users too.
If you have something X thats either hard* to use or hard* to re-use/read/adapt it won't be popular.
*slightly hard

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-27 19:10

>>2
so if i make something completely retarded with zero use cases, but it has good documentation and api, it will be really popular?

somehow i doubt that

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-27 19:16

>>3
https://esolangs.org/wiki/Main_Page

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-28 1:03

FIENNES 5 GET

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-29 11:41

So basically CSS Minecraft?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 2:36

fonts.googleapis.com

Every time. Why are people obsessed with making sure every last single website that exists phones home to Google?

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 4:31

>>7
0.0.0.0 fonts.googleapis.com

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 6:35

>>8
I already have this. And about 30k other entries. But it still annoys me. And I wouldn't trust a site that does this even if its service is usable otherwise. As a matter or principle, you can say.

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 7:33

>>7
You have no idea how much bandwidth this crap costs - a common solution is to put everything popular(js frameworks,fonts, css) on external hosts and present a thin presentation layer which pulls all dependencies in(also they're cached for all sites:jquery hosted in one place is more efficient than requesting it from every site - same goes with fonts(fonts.googleapis.com is really fast, free and low-latency.)

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 7:34

These are my dubs - check 'em

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 17:03

voxelcss

https://u.pomf.is/hcrtnp.png

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 20:05

>>12
https://u.pomf.is/jwfbqu.png

Name: Anonymous 2016-01-31 1:13

Welcome back to PSX-era depth sorting.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 1:39

All of computing history shall be reinvented in-the-browser. Even life itself will be in-the-browser. Like serial experiments lain, but with lots of javascript and css.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 5:42

>>15
It happens for every single fucking computing technology ever. Mankind only ever progresses to some asymptotic level of software development, then starts completely over with the next iteration. All this shit is a distraction and we would have far better computing if people didn't keep on reinventing the wheel like fucking cavemen all the time.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 9:08

>>16
Don't you think sometimes we get a better wheel out of it?

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 22:29

>>17
When the best we currently have is an oval wheel made out of plastic, then JS+CSS is a square wheel made out of tampons.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 23:03

>>15
>>16
>>18
What would you prefer? Java+Swing? X11 support in applications? VNC connections everywhere?

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 23:19

Optimise

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 2:44

>>20
Optimize your orthography, ``please''!

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 14:52

Raw OpenGL, >>19-chan.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 16:20

>>21
``Optimize'' is not a word, senpai.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 17:29

>>23
^\\Senpai'' is not a word, dude.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 18:19

>>24
⁶⁶Dude⁹⁹ is not a word, Kamerad.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 18:27

>>25
⁽⁽Kamerad₎₎ is not a word, Genosse.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-03 3:02

GENOSSE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-03 5:46

>>19
I would prefer that new types of problems be tackled by new software, not the same old shit rolled into today's plastic wrapper. The actual human-computer informational exchange has not changed in 40 years.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-03 10:08

>>28
Nobody gonna ask what you'd prefer.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-04 7:30

>>30
See >>19

dom element for every quad XD

1 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-27 18:06

2 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-27 18:53

3 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-27 19:10

4 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-27 19:16

5 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-28 1:03

6 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-29 11:41

7 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 2:36

8 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 4:31

9 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 6:35

10 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 7:33

11 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 7:34

12 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 17:03

13 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-30 20:05

14 Name: Anonymous 2016-01-31 1:13

15 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 1:39

16 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 5:42

17 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 9:08

18 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 22:29

19 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 23:03

20 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-01 23:19

21 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 2:44

22 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 14:52

23 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 16:20

24 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 17:29

25 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 18:19

26 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-02 18:27

27 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-03 3:02

28 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-03 5:46

29 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-03 10:08

30 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-04 7:30