/prog/ - Dubs checker in modern C

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-07 22:22

struct dubs_checker {
  unsigned long long int num;
};
typedef struct dubs_checker dubs_checker_t;

dubs_checker_t *
dubs_checker_new (  )
  {
    return calloc ( sizeof ( dubs_checker_t , 1 ) ;
  }

int
dubs_checker_set_num ( dubs_checker_t * dubs_checker, unsigned long long int num)
  {
    ( * dubs_checker ) .
      num=num
    ;
    return 1;
  }

int
dubs_checker_check ( dubs_checker_t * dubs_checker )
  {
    unsigned long long int num = ( * dubs_checker) .num ;
    return
      num > 10
    &&
      num % 10
    ==
      ( num / 10 % 10 )
    ;
  }

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-07 22:25

Just look at the freaking numbers, who needs a computer to check their dubs?

Luddites, unite!

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-07 23:58

Your dubs checker only checks for base 10 dubs... dubs in other bases deserve equal treatment fucking racist!.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-08 5:42

calloc ( sizeof ( dubs_checker_t , 1 )

Double whoopsies!

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-08 6:44

JACKSON 5 GET

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-08 6:55

You're telling me people actually use that kind of indentation? I thought newline braces alone were horrific.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-09 1:53

Modern C

This doesn't look like Go

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-09 2:31

>>7
C 2.0 was a failed experiment.

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2016-02-09 3:40

You're missing a few more levels of superfluous indirection and design patterns for it to be truly "modern".

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-09 21:20

>>3
Exactly. To solve this, I would create a base ``dubs_checker" and simply extend this for all radixes. Then you can use basic dependency injection for testing and whatnot.

Name: Anonymous 2016-02-10 22:29

TEST CASE GET

Dubs checker in modern C

1 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-07 22:22

2 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-07 22:25

3 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-07 23:58

4 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-08 5:42

5 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-08 6:44

6 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-08 6:55

7 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-09 1:53

8 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-09 2:31

9 Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2016-02-09 3:40

10 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-09 21:20

11 Name: Anonymous 2016-02-10 22:29