This will not be the first board you've been banned from for starting trouble. A quick google search shows the issues you caused in /prog/. Do you want to be a contributor to this community, or a source of arguments?
However there is a rub: a main contributor to that game hates feminists, and is pro-marry-girl-children, and often cites Deuteronomy 22 28-29 in the original hebrew. People have deleted this contributors work before for that, and try to cencor the project because he is a contributor. Many in opensource feel that opensource ends where their belief in women's rights and opposition to old ideas such as men marrying girl children, begins: progressive pro-women, anti-male-supremacist (man is ba'al, _Master_, of the woman in the old testament, supremacist) politics are more important than libre software.
Open source community, being socialist-minded, is known to react dismissively at cases of copyright infringement.
He hasn't provided any evidence that socialism and acting dismissively to cases of copyright infringement are linked. He starts with the bullshit right off the bat.http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Expropriation+of+the+Expropriators
argument on copyright in socialism has no weight, as Marx as far as I know never wrote about copyright.From the investor's perspective, there is little difference between stealing from shop and stealing from intellectual space. The capitalist loses profits in both cases, because some useless nigger thinks he can just take it without respecting property rights.
I'm certainly not dismissive of copyright infringement. It just depends what copyright is being infringed.
Open Source = Copyright Infringementstop misusing the assignment operator to mean equality
For works published after 1977, the copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years.Life of the author is already ridiculous enough, but what logical reason is there for it to extend after h(is)|(er) death? It's just so companies like Disney can milk as much money as possible, which I find ironic because lots of Disney's early films are based on public domain works.
No, that's not what I meant. I meant the conditions of the copyright, as in if it is full copyright, or only some rights reserved, for example the principles of the GPL or BSD license.
In a perfect world [...] What stops you?
Is it stealing then? Who owns it?
gnome theme submitted by users
copyright violation by gnme developer
Comparing this function to disassembled binaries from Windows XP, Birr argued that the BadStack function was simply copy-pasted from Windows XP, given that they were identical. Alex Ionescu, the author of the code, asserted that while the Windows XP binary in question was indeed disassembled and studied, the code was not merely copy-pasted, but reimplemented; the reason why the functions were identical, Ionescu claimed, was because there was only one possible way to implement the function.