Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

musl libc

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-26 13:49

musl is lightweight, fast, simple, free, and strives to be correct in the sense of standards-conformance and safety.

Home page: https://www.musl-libc.org/
Source code: https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree
Comparison with other libcs: http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-26 18:17

Seems pretty crap. Worse performance than glibc in every relevant test.

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-27 18:14

Check out muh dubs

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-28 3:37

is there portable libc, that would work on all systems?

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-28 7:33

>>4
Behold, the sum of all humanity's history and development has culminated in this pinnacle: A question comprised of nothing but pure, concentrated stupidity!

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-28 11:37

>>5
nobody needs Linux. It is the worst OS invented, even DOS was better.

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-28 12:35

>>4
newlib but it's shit.

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-28 21:13

>>4
Static link musl with your program and it will run on any system, independent on its libc.

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-29 5:59

>>8
Finally, I'll be able to run the same binaries on OS-9 and Windows PocketPC 2000!

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-29 6:09

>>8 >>9
musl runs only on Linux:
What are musl’s dependencies?
Linux 2.6 or later. Earlier versions will suffice for running most simple single-threaded programs, but due to bugs and conformance issues at the kernel level, musl is not offically supported on earlier kernels.

TLDR: if it doesn't support OpenGenera, it is crap.

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-29 7:52

>>10
Don't interrupt our mocking of >>4 with the facts.

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-29 9:57

>>10
Nobody uses OpenGenera unironically anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-30 2:52

>>6
Linux is not an operating system.

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-30 17:15

>>13
Fuck off and go eat more of your foot pickings, Stallman.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List