/prog/ - CamelCase vs lisp-case vs python_case

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-22 23:43

discuss-which-is-the-best

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-22 23:59

Hyphens are clearly the best.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 0:29

I just use whatever the convention is for the language I'm using.

Though I must say (though it's only somewhat related) that __name__ pisses me off. There's a limit to the amount of underscores one should use if sanity is to be kept intact.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 3:40

______________________________faggot______________________________

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 6:09

What.about.OOP.Case.questionmark()

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 7:07

English

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 7:58

>>3

There's a limit to the amount of underscores one should use if sanity is to be kept intact.

And yet a lisperg knows no bounds with parentheses.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 8:14

>>3
underscores are a necessary evil when writing a C library, because you just don't know what some pleb is going to #define

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 9:03

>>3
this. none is really superior but keep it consistent

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 10:08

>>7
I know IHBT, but it certainly beats )]);};))}}}};, and all the fucking punctuation spam of other languages.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 11:01

>>10
check-'em

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 17:31

>>1,2
What languages allow you to use lisp-case? Won't most languages interpret it as the subtraction operator?

>>5
Is that kind of syntax valid in C/C++? I know it's allowed for namespaces in VC++ .NET, but I thought the member operator could only be used once in a given statement?

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 19:14

>>12
Perl 6 allows lisp-case thanks to sigils

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-24 2:25

>>12
Yes, in C and C++ you can chain "." indefinitely.

#include <stdio.h>

typedef struct {
    int watermelon;
    const char *name;
} nigger;

typedef struct {
    nigger nig;
} bad_person;

typedef struct {
    bad_person bad;
} thief;

const char *who_stole_my_bike(thief s) {
    return s.bad.nig.name;
}

int main(void) {
	nigger nig = { 9001, "Jamal" };
	bad_person b = { nig };
	thief t = { b };
	printf("%s\n", who_stole_my_bike(t));
	return 0;
}

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 9:14

why doesn't this survey ask for the gay and retarded Ada_Syntax option

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-26 1:11

dOnkeycAse.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-26 9:59

>>7
But double underscores are so weird. Lisp's parentheses at least make sense. In python for example, why __name__ instead of ____name____ or _name_? That last one I can live with.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-27 21:09

>>12
FORTH

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-28 8:39

>>5
You're doing it wrong.

      {
        What.about().OOP().Case().questionmark();
      }
    }
  }
}

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-29 3:46

>>16
hoRsecASe
asScasE

CamelCase vs lisp-case vs python_case

1 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-22 23:43

2 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-22 23:59

3 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 0:29

4 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 3:40

5 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 6:09

6 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 7:07

7 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 7:58

8 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 8:14

9 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 9:03

10 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 10:08

11 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 11:01

12 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 17:31

13 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-23 19:14

14 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-24 2:25

15 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-25 9:14

16 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-26 1:11

17 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-26 9:59

18 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-27 21:09

19 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-28 8:39

20 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-29 3:46