The Jews have long conspired to destroy Linux

While some Jews never had ambitions of destroying Linux and instead joined ranks with Linux programmers to be a part of the winning team, there has long been a conspiracy among a certain cabal of Jews to undermine and ultimately destroy Linux. All icons of non-Jewish success must be destroyed.

You've probably seen that meme image of the edgy Asian kid in his high-school yearbook with the caption "It's not enough that I should succeed; other's should fail." But did you know that quote was first made by (((David Merrick)))?

Linux must be destroyed simply because it is a representation of European success and ingenuity at software development.

It goes all the way back to 1999. For over 17 years, these Jews have sat there with envy in their eyes, wishing Linus would keel over and die. Is it any wonder that systemd has emerged as the biggest threat in recent years, backed by Jewish moneyed interests?

Now onto the juicy part. It's worth reading the whole article, but here's the excerpt.

http://jcpa.org/article/neo-paganism-in-the-public-square-and-its-relevance-to-judaism/

In today’s fragmented society a large number of religious and secular neo-pagan expressions have emerged and are gathering strength. An increased interest in nature is a central element in many of its manifestations. Expressions of this attitude are found among neo-pagan believers, neo-Nazis and some extreme environmentalist currents.

...

Some neo-pagan expressions are religious, others secular. The latter concern secular religion, i.e., ideology, as well as popular culture. We also find indications of this in a business context. Semantics show this well: the pagan idiom has permeated the world’s leading papers. Money-hungry people are considered to worship Mammon. Consumerism is called ‘a contemporary religion.’

When The Economist wrote about Nobuhiko Kawamoto, the retiring chief executive of Honda, it mentioned that “he has worshipped fast machines all his life.” When he became chief executive in 1960, “Honda was in thrall to its engineers, a priesthood housed in separate premises.”4

Time magazine writes of the software programmer Linus Torvalds:

Pale, fleshy groupies surround him on all sides, adoration in their eyes….Some call him a god and want to be among his disciples, helping spread the word….He’s 28 years old, and his religion is called Linux, after a piece of computer code he wrote for kicks in 1991, while a student at the University of Helsinki.5 The Financial Times says the same in other words: “Linux is not just about software. Among devotees, the ‘alternative’ computer operating system has become a religion.”6

Continued ...

...

Establishing a Watch

Searching for the central values of Judaism, we cannot invent or re-invent them: they have been defined by classical Judaism. Trying continually to twist them to fit the passing fashions of the surrounding world not only means distorting them, it is also politically and strategically unwise.

So what does the return of paganism mean for Judaism? It forces us to focus on the importance of Jewish law and tradition, which proclaims that nature is not the dominant force in the world, nor is it sacred. There is a unique divine force above nature. Nature’s laws represent the world of the savage and barbarian; the Noahide laws represent civil society. Civilization must be intolerant toward barbarity. No compromise is possible between the monotheist God and the polytheist deities.

The Jewish agenda is a very long one. Many things assimilated Jews consider important should be pushed down the Jewish agenda. The new outside reality should help us understand that propagating the Noahide commandments to humanity should have had a higher place on this agenda a long time ago.

It is not very clear where we are going. We live in a rapidly changing world where we must continuously catch weak signals and watch whether they get stronger. Nothing good for the Jews — nor for society at large — can come out of a worldwide strengthening of paganism. The same goes for a distorted emphasis on the importance of nature.

One popular mode of civic action today is the establishment of “watches.” If a certain phenomenon is worrying, one develops ongoing documentation on what is happening so that, if threats arise, one is mentally prepared and can react. If, indeed, protecting nature is a key issue of the next century, there seem to be enough reasons for Jewish observers to watch which direction this powerful, renewed interest in nature will take, and what consequences this may have for world Jewry. This refers to both the religious focus on nature of neo-paganism and the ideological one of extreme environmentalist currents.

...

[/m]The Noahide Laws

In the Torah, God tells not only the Jews but also humanity in general that they should not live according to the laws of nature. Judaism totally rejects the “animal in man” and attempts to suppress it. Among the 613 commandments given to the Jews, there are seven which Judaism considers binding for all humanity. Non-Jews are expected to practice these Noahide laws at the very least: they prohibit idolatry, the vain use of God’s name, murder, sexual transgressions, theft, and eating the flesh of live animals, and require all people to establish courts of law to govern themselves. Two of these commandments are relevant to man’s relation with nature: not eating the flesh of live animals, and the recognition of God and the prohibition of idolatry. The latter forbids revering nature or any part of it as sacred.

These Noahide laws are Judaism’s central message to the world. A world which would study these laws and adhere to them would be a much more moral place than the one we live in today. Judaism is not a universal religion in the sense that it has to take a position on everything which happens in the world. Anybody familiar with the strategic aspects of propagating ideas knows that it is counterproductive to focus on secondary issues: the human mind can retain only a limited number of messages.[/m]

Simply, Jews consider the act of goyim being able to write software idolatry.

And yes, Jews have also been behind the veganism movement since the beginning. Eating meat is only a luxury to be enjoyed by Jews in the New World Order.

>>3
Sorry for the bad tag, but you get the idea.

void* fuckoff[3]
fuckoff[0] = &g;
fuckoff[1] = &pol;
fuckoff[2] = &b;
srand(time(NULL));
(*fuckoff[rand()%3])();

>>5
damn, forgot a semicolon

>>5,6
You're a terrible programmer.
size_t i = 0;
void (* oygevalt[3])(void) = { auschwitz, gas_shower, ovens };
for (;;) { oygevalt[i++ & 3](); }

>>7
for(size_t i = 0; i < 4; i++) printf("%d ", i&3);

stdout:
0 1 2 3

nice off by one dumbass

>>8
That's a desired feature of the code. When the expression evaluates to 3 and calls into a bad address, you go to hell.

(define stormfag-home?
(lambda ()
(let* ((homes '(4chan
stormfront
reddit))
(homes-len (length homes))
(which-home (list-ref
homes
(random homes-len))))
which-home)))

>>9
more like I make your shitty software execute arbitrary code

>>10,11
https://sugoi.vidyagam.es/qt/5Dxn8xM.mp4

>>1

Linux
ingenuity at software development.

/0 doesn't compute

>>10
What programming language is this?

>>7
holocaust has failed due to a segfault.

>>7

size_t

How can you call someone else a terrible programmer?

>>14
Racket

Quinary dubs

Check em

http://maintainablecode.logdown.com/posts/159916-memcpy-memmove-and-memset-are-deprecated

>>20

The phrase 'blasting bytes' will show up several times in this article. It refers to using special, blazingly fast, hardware instructions that operate over multiple pieces of data, treating the data as nothing more than raw bytes. This is actually the appeal of the *mem functions: speed.

It's not. It's just comfort for not having to write loops all the time.

Thou shalt foreswear, renounce, and abjure the vile heresy which claimeth that ``All the world's an x86''

...not every ISA has special instructions for moving bytes and such.

Dubs claimed, for the jews

>>20
Who cares about Sepples.

Check em

Check em

Check em

Check em

>>20
But onii-chan, C++ is obsolete.

Check em

Check em

Check em

Check em

>>29-32
No.

Check em

Check em

Check em

Check em

Check em

Check em

Check em