most accurate programming rankings

https://ipfs.pics/QmUCtmtv5tTkbxFF5SbvdqGB2VgkgpVgeYtUiwFtMv9hVa

>>1
Sounds like normie wrote all this:
Binary is type of encoding not language.
NAND gates are simplest electronic elements.
Turing machines are pretty mainstream part of CS.
Fractal generators are popular.
"combintors" are part of functional paradigm.
Malbolge and brainfuck are most popular esoteric language(they are both extremely simple)
Hypercomputation is a theoretical computation class.
Game of Life is known widely, i've wrote several pattern rules for it here: http://w11.zetaboards.com/frozenbbs/forum/4223812/ (i recommend Glitch City and Glitch Maze first)

>>2

normie

U mena bydlo?

>>2
Actually, FRACTRAN is insightful enough. Although harder to implement than brainfuck.

>>4
The post was about the "Fractal iterations" box: its software like apophysis,jwildfire,mandelbulb3d,xenodream,visions of chaos.
They produce fractal art and animations that look "esoteric" to normies(that is some structure of the formula is aesthetically pleasing in its complexity)

>>1

game of life next to Haskell and APL

yeah, a freshman homework assignment is on the same level as these...

FrozenAnus's BBS is pretty fucking pathetic, he's the only one who ever posts there.

>>6
uh.. it means programming *in* game of life - not coding a game of life simulator

>>8

programming *in* game of life

there's no way for it to be Touring complete or hold any deterministic state.

\*\b.*\b\*

*polecat keredditabs*

>>9
It is turing complete

>>10
proof? as in mathematical proof

>>9
Uh, which cells are alive and dead is how it stores state.

>>11
It's not a formal proof but it is an implementation.
http://rendell-attic.org/gol/tm.htm

>>13
In other words, a constructive proof.