Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Lisp has no syntax

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 19:12

Lisp is parsed by a mutable jump table, not any of your dumb goyish formalisms.

Can you dumb goyim define a mutable jump table with your syntax mechanisms?

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 19:17

ok

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2016-10-01 15:10

Lisp has no syntax. How does it parse?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 17:01

>>3
If LISP has no syntax, what are syntax-rules

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 17:40

>>3
Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 15:35

>>4
If there is no god, what is bible?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 15:55

>>6
A rather boring historical novel.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 16:26

>>6
A book written by kikes.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-03 18:58

>>3
how does what parse what

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-03 20:17

>>9
Exactly

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-03 21:21

Check em

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-06 17:30

No, the first value is the function and the rest are the arguments

It's a sublimely expressive syntax, for expert programmers only

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-06 17:52

This may surprise you, but Javascript is actually the gateway drug that leads to LISP.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-06 17:54

>>13
Why, because of the REPL? Or because it's so crappy, that it'll scare people away from C-like languages?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-07 15:15

>>14

Javascipt has a horrible object system, so people are drawn towards functional programming in Javascript, because they are searching for something modular and manageable. I guess something like that.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-07 15:16

>>14
Also in Javascript to create private variables, you need to make use of closures. This approach generates a lot of boilerplate. Just imagine the happiness, when they find out, that there exist things like macros.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-07 15:25

>>16
Why do you, use, so many, random commas?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-07 15:56

>>17
nice prime, GET

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-07 18:02

>>15
Javascript is an OOP language unlike C#/++/Java. You're saying that OOP is horrible and COP is OK?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-07 18:05

>>19
COP is still OOP.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-07 18:13

Are LISPs useful for anything besides creating new LISPs?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-07 18:25

>>20
NOOPE.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-07 20:17

>>21
LISP can be molded to be whatever language you want. That's why everyone makes their own LISP.

People make all those languages that compile to JavaScript because JavaScript is better. It's a superior compilation target. Such as it is with LISP and macros.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-07 20:46

Lisp has no syntax

How does it look?

Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-07 22:48

>>22
Class-based programming, or more commonly class-orientation, is a style of object-oriented programming (OOP)

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-08 0:01

What the fuck is OOP then, according to the pedantic retards in this thread?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-08 0:30

COP is a specific type of OOP. It's the Java/Sepples model, where you define a class at compile time and instantiate objects of a class at runtime. The other type of OOP is the weird prototype-based OOP that JS has.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List