is strtok() evil
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-19 3:54
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-19 5:48
>>1Any C library function is ancient exploitable shit from UNIX era. Write your own safe_strtok
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-19 6:49
That's why strtok_r was introduced.
Name:
Cudder
!cXCudderUE
2016-10-19 10:33
No.
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-19 11:24
JACKSON FIVE GET
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-19 12:55
yes its evil
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-19 13:26
1. It's impure.
2. The C++ version isn't overloaded to support std::string.
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-19 14:07
FUNCTIONS ARE EVIL USE GOTO INSTEAD
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-19 15:51
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-19 16:31
the destructive effect of namefags still haunts this board
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-19 16:52
Substrings and slicing were already around when C was created. They share the same memory as the original string.
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-20 0:46
It's just a little tok
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-20 1:42
Name:
Anonymous
2016-10-20 6:57
>>8functions are just a
goto that ends with a
comefrom