Name:
Anonymous
2016-12-06 11:15
Name:
Anonymous
2016-12-06 11:36
eh, it's clearly an educational exercise and not something that's supposed to be usable in practice
Name:
Anonymous
2016-12-06 20:35
http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1608/30131.htmlany one tried this "suckless" shell? is it any good?
Name:
Anonymous
2016-12-08 22:54
>>4Thanks, I'll stick to BASH.
Name:
Anonymous
2016-12-09 18:59
>>9Because it just works(tm).
Name:
Anonymous
2016-12-09 23:24
I'll never understand why people in %CURRENT_YEAR% would choose to write new software in C.
Name:
Anonymous
2016-12-10 0:14
>>11What solution are you proposing
Name:
Anonymous
2016-12-10 7:12
>>11Because C is lowest common denominator. All useful hardware has a minimal C99/C89 compiler(rarely there only forth or macro assembler).
Name:
Anonymous
2016-12-10 20:13
>>15All useful hardware is unable to run C programs.