Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

white a shell in C courtsey of hacker news

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-06 11:15

utter shit https://brennan.io/2015/01/16/write-a-shell-in-c/
look at this fucking garbage https://github.com/brenns10/lsh/blob/407938170e8b40d231781576e05282a41634848c/src/main.c
doesn't do ANYTHING.

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-06 11:17

url ends in .io

What did you expect?

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-06 11:36

eh, it's clearly an educational exercise and not something that's supposed to be usable in practice

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-06 20:35

http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1608/30131.html

any one tried this "suckless" shell? is it any good?

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-06 21:34

>>4
autism

Name: autism 2016-12-06 21:36

>>5
check my autism

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-08 9:57

bump

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-08 22:54

>>4
Thanks, I'll stick to BASH.

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-09 1:08

>>8
Why?

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-09 18:59

>>9
Because it just works(tm).

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-09 23:24

I'll never understand why people in %CURRENT_YEAR% would choose to write new software in C.

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-10 0:14

>>11
What solution are you proposing

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-10 0:30

>>13
Ada, obviously.

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-10 0:41

>>14
Me, obviously.

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-10 7:12

>>11
Because C is lowest common denominator. All useful hardware has a minimal C99/C89 compiler(rarely there only forth or macro assembler).

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-10 18:44

>>12
Rust, the new C/C++.

Name: Anonymous 2016-12-10 20:13

>>15
All useful hardware is unable to run C programs.