Zero-based arrays are for kikes, niggers, and gays

Zero-based arrays are for kikes (Lisp).

Zero-based arrays are for niggers (C).

Zero-based arrays are for gays (ML).

`Rockin very loose pants'

https://soundcloud.com/actionbronson/action-bronson-easy-rider

https://soundcloud.com/thatgirlbishop/wild-horses

IBM has a 5 qubit machine hooked up to the internet =)

I can't make heads or tails of the thing just yet though ;D

>>43
they dont

my nama jef..

>>44
IBM does, you can find it by googling 'Experience IBM Quantum'

It's a superposition pun lol

It doesn't look like trit based crypto could really be any weaker than bit-based systems unless you're relying on some maximal scattering property, or they manage to build cutrits or cubitrits / cupentrits /etc

3^5 is also pretty close to 2^8 so that's kind of handy, only twelve values short

>>43,45
Is it an actual quantum computer as defined by, say, Feynman or is it a ``quantum computer'' as defined by IBM? To make the latter is trivial, you only need enough money for smoke and mirrors so the public believes it. The great thing about the five qubit computer is that classical computers can still easily imitate them, so you can even have a ``demo''.

>>47
It's probably somewhere in the middle, seriously

The design of the thing seems fairly weak also, a [q0 -> q1 -> q2 <- q3 <- q4] + [q0 -> q2 <- q4] layout doesn't really allow any classical cycles

2q * [0inp / 2out], 2q * [1inp / 1out], 1q * [4inp / 0out]

something like [q0 <-> q1 -> q2 -> q3] + [q0 <-> q3] you would think

\(2q * [0inp / 2out], 2q * [1inp / 1out], 1q * [4inp / 0out]\)

>>49
What a waste of resources