holy fuck this is not programming you stupid noobs.
Could someone just make a new /prog/ because the guy who runs this one obviously gave up a long time ago.
Name:
Anonymous2017-03-04 3:39
"Don't sell your apples today, they'll be worth more tomorrow!" - is the premise of apple inflation, and the general cause of bought apples being less fresh
Name:
Anonymous2017-03-04 3:50
It's like the currency is going out of date faster than the apples
Name:
Anonymous2017-03-04 6:52
>>26 I've did it before, and i found moderating a forum that attracts types like of /prog/ too demanding and closed it(FrozenBBS). I've settled on having a private wiki on reddit instead. In general allowing anonymous access and lax moderation(you can't really stay 24/7 moderating this shit) will result in same thing as progrider. While it does appeal to some people to have control over moderating /prog/-like forum, its essentially unpaid job with very little cost/benefit ratio, the amount of interesting content doesn't worth the time(and generally such content is just rehashed stackoverflow/hackernews/reddit threads)
>>26 Why would we talk about programming on a Touhou textboard?
Name:
Anonymous2017-03-04 9:00
>>25 For p-adic apples, you can use the lexicographical ordering because a p-adic apple is essentially a formal series of finite sets of apples. Other apples could be compared using the axiom of choice, but you cannot order non-archimedean apple fields such that the order plays well with the usual operations. While this makes it a lot less useful than an order of real apples, it is to be expected that reality is privileged in an empirical field like mathematics. You would usually work with different properties of the non-archimedean apples.
Name:
Anonymous2017-03-04 10:59
>>30 Lets see these touhou implement a trinary xor!
Name:
Anonymous2017-03-04 13:09
>>30,32 this thread is not about touhou, it is about apples.
Name:
Anonymous2017-03-04 13:58
What will a quantum biapple machine do with triapples?
>>44 IBM does, you can find it by googling 'Experience IBM Quantum'
It's a superposition pun lol
It doesn't look like trit based crypto could really be any weaker than bit-based systems unless you're relying on some maximal scattering property, or they manage to build cutrits or cubitrits / cupentrits /etc
3^5 is also pretty close to 2^8 so that's kind of handy, only twelve values short
Name:
Anonymous2017-03-14 8:28
>>43,45 Is it an actual quantum computer as defined by, say, Feynman or is it a ``quantum computer'' as defined by IBM? To make the latter is trivial, you only need enough money for smoke and mirrors so the public believes it. The great thing about the five qubit computer is that classical computers can still easily imitate them, so you can even have a ``demo''.
Name:
Anonymous2017-03-14 13:53
>>47 It's probably somewhere in the middle, seriously
The design of the thing seems fairly weak also, a [q0 -> q1 -> q2 <- q3 <- q4] + [q0 -> q2 <- q4] layout doesn't really allow any classical cycles