Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Terminal Autism

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-21 11:38

I get this so often its getting annoying to see flaws in everything.
1.See flaw in program X
2.See program X are too flawed and decided to rewrite it
3.See another program Y and too decided to rewrite it
4.See the libraries they use and decide to rewrite them
5.Also decide to write a better standard library.
6.OS is too flawed, decided to write my own.
7.After a few weeks change to another language, because first one is too flawed.
8.Time to write my own language. This one is too flawed.
9.Become disgusted with hardware and portability.
10.start thinking of designing my own hardware
11.see hardware design tools as flawed, decide to rewrite them.
12. finally think how much it would cost to design this perfect hardware.
13. forger about it and get annoyed by #1 again

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-21 12:34

Apathy is the only answer.

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-21 19:07

I try to pretend I didn't see anything unless rewriting program X doesn't take too long.

Name: Anonymous 2017-05-26 9:47

I try to pretend CVEs are never exploited and resist the urge to rewrite Cee/Sepples code in question.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-07 10:01

decide the universe is flawed. rewrite it.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-07 11:39

Four students were arguing about software. One said: "This software is flawed."

The other said: "Libraries which software depends on are flawed."
Third replied: "Its a flaw in the OS and libc that libraries depend on."
Fourth pondered and concluded:"Hardware flaws and limits are to blame for such flaws in OS and libc"

The Sussman happened to be passing by.
He told them: "Not the software, not the libraries, not the libc, not the OS, not hardware; mind is flawed."

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-07 22:16

>>6
The Sussman's computer wouldn't have a libc.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 6:16

>>7
Thats the computer students use. Sussman was just passing by.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 11:10

Mind is essentially another hardware&software layer.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 11:17

>>9
and it's flawed

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 11:18

but those dubs are flawless

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 11:20

>>11
>Anonymous 2017-06-08 11:18
The time could end in 11:11

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 11:29

Software can be perfect if designed by perfect AI which would be run on perfect hardware design by perfect AI designed by imperfect AI.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 11:51

>>13
Software can be perfect if designed by perfect AI
you need perfect AI to design perfect software but AI itself is software so it will only be perfect if designed by perfect AI. the requirements are circular. how enterprise!

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 11:55

>>14 That last line explains it. "perfect AI" is bootstrapped from imperfect "code monkey" AI

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 11:58

>>15
but you said that perfect software needs to be created by a perfect AI that runs on a perfect hardware. the problem is that AI itself still is software - so either imperfect AI can create perfect software or you can't create perfect software without already having perfect software

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 12:07

>imperfect AI can create perfect software
Machine learning is all about how imperfect brute force(reinforcement learning) creates "perfect AI"
In that case they run AlphaGO over Pro games to seed initial expertise, then made it play itself for millions of games to sharpen its skills-> train on that data->repeat, now its above any human player.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 12:19

Note that AlphaGo doesn't improve itself, its improves the data in its training dataset.
The path to Strong AI lies in recursive optimization of AI code by itself or another AI.
https://www.reddit.com/r/frozenvoid/wiki/ai/super-intelligent/recursive-optimization/function_generator

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-08 14:07

Graphical Autism

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List