Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Common Lisp was a mistake

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 3:43

Common Lisp created the Smug Lisp Assholes.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 4:20

weenies*

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 10:33

Fortunately their main output is just bragging about language superiority and is of no threat to mainstream software hindustry.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 17:33

What would win?
1. Most powerful language in the world with most flexible metaprogramming and abstraction facilities.
2.An Algol resurrected by tacking on features on top of C.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 17:39

>>4
javascript

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 19:04

>>4
1. jmp [table+4*eax]
2. You can't make a silk purse from a sow's ear.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 19:47

>>4
1.Executable XML with OOP features.
2.Executable Templates with OOP features.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-20 7:56

Common Lisp is for the common man. The refined aristocrat prefers a better Scheme.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-29 9:35

NotLisp: var isCloser = x1 * x1 + y1 * y1 < x2 * x2 + y2 * y2 // 0 brackets
LITHP: (define is-closer (< (+ (* x1 x1) (* y1 y1)) (+ (* x2 x2) (* y2 y2)))) ; 16 brackets

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-29 18:04

>>6
why isn't the array outside of the brackets

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-29 18:06

>>10
You can write it table[eax*4] if you want to.

Name: Anonymous 2017-06-29 18:26

>>11
neat

Common Lisp was a mistake

1 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 3:43

2 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 4:20

3 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 10:33

4 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 17:33

5 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 17:39

6 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 19:04

7 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-15 19:47

8 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-20 7:56

9 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-29 9:35

10 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-29 18:04

11 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-29 18:06

12 Name: Anonymous 2017-06-29 18:26