Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

The Virgin Programmer vs The Chad Coder

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-08 9:06

Latest chan meme applied to /prog/

Virgin Programmer:
Has the latest macbook loaded with latest compilers
Codes in modern functional style
Code is visually pleasing, fully indented
All variables and functions are descriptively named
Comments are filled with explanations and relevant information
Produces portable, safe code that is debugged, linted, statically analyzed and theorem proved ad nauseum
Code almost never crashes
Every bug report is answered with patches and profuse apologizing

The Chad Coder:
Codes in direct, brutal imperative style
Thinks recursion is a meme
Doesn't indent anything
All variables are one letter, functions are random verbs with numbers
Code crashes several times per hour
Never changed his computer
Produces code that "works on my machine"
Debugging consists of console messages peppered randomly through code
Comments consist of curses and threats to other programmers and software
When someone posts a bug report, laughs at it, marks it wontfix or claims you're using his software wrong

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-05 21:32

>>117
Cool strawman, fam.

>>119
And you could have responded to the more salient details and points made in >>110 but instead resorted to sarcasm, thus displaying that you have no argument. It would appear that you've been blown the fuck out (BTFO) as the kids say these days.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-05 22:44

>>117
What can I say? I keep an open mind

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-05 23:13

>>121
All actual points amount to ``less intensive, but it's there'', which I addressed in a simple way that required only a minimum of brainpower. But let's leave it at this, you are clearly more keen on epic Twitter burns than actual discussion and I don't feel like pre-chewing every point as if writing for Redditards.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-06 20:32

chad coder: creator of anus.h, a collection of cute preprocessor tricks that shouldn't be used in any serious app

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-07 6:44

>>124
#include <my/anus>!

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-07 13:38

Chad doesn't write code. Thats too complex.
He gets to be the manager ordering virgin programmers.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-07 15:59

>>126
this

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-08 1:38

>>126
that's why he gets promoted to manager

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-08 21:48

>>117
it's better to read experts such as Alex Jones, David Icke and that guy on /pol/
This isn't even an argument.
It's like saying you disagree with a guy that told you "grass is green" because he's homeless.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-09 1:34

>>129
I can understand people not discussing with homeless people, though

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-11 19:08

>>130
Most homeless people are drug addicts, mentally ill, and on top of that smell bad. It's not hard to see why nobody would listen if one went around telling people the grass is green.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-12 3:03

>>131
Well said

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-12 3:21

Well dubbed

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-12 6:38

>>129
'haha u believe in what alex jones says dumbass' is a valid response to 'haha u believe what nyt says dumbass', dumbass

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-12 11:40

>>134
No it's not, dumbfuck.
It's a fallacy.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-12 12:01

>>135
is a fallacy a fallacy when it's a response to another fallacy? really makes u think ....

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-12 12:08

>>136
Definitely is.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-12 13:03

>>136
What do you think, genius?

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-12 21:03

>>138
Maybe?

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-13 20:56

virgin programmer: steals stale 4chin memes and reposts them elsewhere
chad apper: creates his own high quality OC maymays

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-13 22:26

>>134
The difference between Alex Jones, is that he admitted in court during his divorce proceedings that his whole show and character is largely an act, the The New York Times on the other hand, presents itself as a serious "paper of record" despite peddling their own type of bullshit. It's a deceptive and false dichotomy to declare that one who is critical of mainstream economists and policy wonks are doing so simply because Alex Jones rants and raves about it. It's simply a cop out to deflect and brush away criticism, because >>103,112,117,119,123,134,136 has no argument.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-14 0:03

>>141
Have, not has. These are multiple people and at least one of them has an argument.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-15 1:06

>>141
sound like valid arguments to me

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-15 6:55

those dubs are valid

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-15 14:35

>>144
Those dubs should be wrapped in foil.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-15 21:32

Pilpul, pilpul everywhere.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-15 21:47

>>142
Still, no one has responded with a valid argument for why $20 trillion US debt is "meaningless", >>110 brought up good points.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-15 22:45

>>147
just print out more money

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-15 22:55

>>146
Pilpul is the Talmudic term used to describe
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-15 23:12

>>110,147
Because it's basically treasury bonds.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-16 14:38

If you don't pay your debts, no one will loan you money anymore. This will force the government to run a balanced budget, so ultimately it's a good thing.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-16 17:43

>>148
Socialist logic.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-17 17:06

Just print more money, whoops! We've become Weimar 2.0, sorry 'bout that, fam.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-18 15:04

>>153
Abolish the federal reserve

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-18 19:15

>>154
I'm more in favor of nationalizing the Fed rather than outright abolishing it. Expell the problematic people running it, base the currency on labor instead of just plain declared fiat, just as was done in Natsoc Germany under Hjalmar Schacht, and make it by law that the minutes of the FOMC and monetary policy be made public to both Congress and posted on the Federal Reserve's Website.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-18 19:17

>>155
I should add that the minutes should be made public on the same day, rather than three or six months later or whatever is the case now. Damn phone ate that part of my text up.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-20 3:39

>>155
except natsoc germany went bankrupt.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-21 19:56

>>157
because the world was against them

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-22 6:32

>>158
for a good reason, Hans

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-22 16:40

>>159
Taking them down to re-establish Jewish financial control over Germany is the diametric opposite of "a good reason."

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List