implications for >>1-kun his decision to like free and open source software implies that he will remain a virgin all his life I can't believe I have to explain this...
>>3 Stop derailing every thread with this nonsense. People aren't going to change their posting habits. They're intentionally shit posting. Saying ``Who are you quoting?'' and ``What programming language is this?'' In every thread doesn't help.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-23 23:47
>>13 Who is he quoting, though? I don't understand.
>>13 Your attempts to police the board are cringe worthy. Stop for your own sake.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-24 1:46
>>13 try to learn the culture of a community before posting.
He is not literally asking who is being quoted, it is a passive aggressive attempt to get >>2 to stop misusing the quoting feature. Its the same with ``What programming language is this?''. No one asking that actually wants to know what programming language is, because it gets posted in off-topic threads that are not related to programming, and dont belong on the board.
Finally: You can't derail a thread that was off-topic in the first place.
>>27 Never heard of it. >>28 That's not a person, a Web page, a book, or any other publication used as a source to quote from. "Popular" usage doesn't indicate proper quoting practices.
Free phone operating system Smart phones are the most widely used form of personal computer today. Thus, the need for a fully free phone operating system is crucial to the proliferation of software freedom. Read more...
Decentralization, federation, and self-hosting This large and fragmented space deals with increased centralization of Web activities, and user reliance on servers they don't control (Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS)). The free software community provided extensive feedback regarding many projects that fall under this initiative. Read more...
Free drivers, firmware, and hardware designs Drivers, firmware, and hardware are integral parts of the computers we use and the devices that interact with them -- and when these things are proprietary, they are incompatible with free software. Therefore, drivers, firmware, and hardware that can be fully used with free software are crucial to the operation of free systems. Read more...
Real-time voice and video chat Many widely used voice-over-IP programs, like Skype and FaceTime, use proprietary protocols and nonfree implementations. These programs seduce free software users into using proprietary software, often two users at a time. Using proprietary voice and video chat software means that we can't be sure who is listening in, because we can't see the code. Unfortunately, Google Hangouts is also not a solution here, because it still requires users to run proprietary software. Read more...
Encourage contribution by people underrepresented in the community Free software relies on contributions from community members. But systemic barriers often prevent interested individuals from becoming contributors, especially when those individuals are from groups that have been historically marginalized. Read more...
Free software and accessibility Accessibility is the inclusive practice of removing barriers that prevent interaction with, or access to software programs by people with disabilities or impairments, or those using assistive, adaptive, or rehabilitative technologies. This includes adding features and building tools, including screen readers, keyboard shortcuts, and more, to increase access to software programs. Read more...
Internationalization of free software Internationalization is the process of designing software so that it can be adapted to various languages and regions without engineering changes. Internationalization is a feature ethically tied to the values of free software, and is often a strength of free software. But we can do better: Free software can accept translation contributions from anyone who submits them, whereas proprietary software companies historically only bother with languages it serves their profit and other interests to include. When we internationalize free software, we make it easier for others to adapt and spread it in other languages and regions. Read more...
Security by and for free software Security is a concern for all computing and all computer users. Although users cannot ever be truly certain of their security when using proprietary software, that does not mean free software is automatically secure. Free software developers and users must take steps to improve the security of free software projects. Read more...
Intelligent personal assistant Apple's Siri, Google Now, Cortana, Amazon Echo's Alexa, and other intelligent personal assistants (IPAs) are becoming more pervasive. Whatever convenience they provide comes with unacceptable tradeoffs: The breadth of access to users' data they take in order to operate is enormous, and both the client and server accessing such data are not distributed, posing Service as a Software Substitute issues. Read more...
Help GNU/Linux distributions be committed to freedom Projects like those on the FSF Licensing and Compliance Lab's list of free distros are dedicated to distributing a complete GNU/Linux operating system that contains only free software. They are high-quality distributions that create a complete free operating system without any binary-only blobs or package trees that contain proprietary software. Read more...
Free software adoption by governments Government adoption of free software has the potential for a huge effect on the proliferation of free software, given that government employs many people, funds millions in software contracts each year, and most people interact with their government in various ways. We must demand that government not be held hostage to proprietary software. Read more...
Name:
Anonymous2018-02-23 3:35
>>36 Just bought that purism trueOS phone. Expected in January. That's a fully free phone OS.
Intelligent personal assistant Apple's Siri, Google Now, Cortana, Amazon Echo's Alexa, and other intelligent personal assistants (IPAs) are becoming more pervasive. Whatever convenience they provide comes with unacceptable tradeoffs: The breadth of access to users' data they take in order to operate is enormous, and both the client and server accessing such data are not distributed, posing Service as a Software Substitute issues. Read more...
more naivete from Stallman. those services are only cheap/free because of the data they harvest. running constantly training these massive neural networks is not cheap, let alone paying hundreds of PhDs to work on improving it. freetards are literally too dumb and too poor to handle this software. their first task should be making an image editor on par with Windows 95's mspaint.exe. I'll wait.
of course Stallman's rebuttal would be, "You don't need an intelligent personal assistant. I use org-mode on my $100 thinkpad gifted to me 10 years ago and it works fine. I don't need money because I live off donations and speaking fees. See, the free software lifestyle works."