possibility to use multi-line lambdas and true lisp macros
But it's exactly what's wrong with Hy! When you start to have this kind of shit, you will either make shitty code or no code at all, like in all lisp-y languages.
Name:
Anonymous2018-02-19 9:09
>>17 that single-expression lambda bullshit is my biggest problem with FIOC, and it actually either forces my designs to be needlessly complex OOP bullshit with unnecessary classes or makes me write defs for function that would only be used in one place and would be more readable if defined inline
with the possibility to use multi-line lambdas and true lisp macros
here are your parenthesis bro ((((()((()((()()()())()(())((((((((()))()())))()()()()((((((()())()((()((()()))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
I'll give the lambdas but don't use macros! You will fall in the metaprogramming k-hole, meditate for years and never write a single line of useful code, like all smug weenies.
Name:
Anonymous2018-02-19 9:30
>>23 but I already use FIOC's metaprogramming features (metaclasses, decorators, eval, exec, AST parsing). macros would just make it more convenient
>>31 The fuck are you even talking about? Did you have a stroke?
Name:
Anonymous2018-02-19 19:56
No strokin', just quotin'.
Name:
Anonymous2018-02-19 21:17
There's a cave oriented plant that glows. We weren't certain how it was possible because it's chemical makeup didn't seem to facilitate such a reaction, but we now understand it as a quantum reaction.