Only programmers should be allowed to become leaders.
Name:
Anonymous2018-05-31 19:20
Only if they can implement fibs in 5 characters or less.
Name:
Anonymous2018-05-31 19:45
the weak should fear the strong
Name:
Anonymous2018-05-31 20:48
Computer scientists are better than programmers.
Name:
Anonymous2018-05-31 22:01
>>4 Oh, please. Spare me the ``programmers aren't the same as developers'' bullshit. There are too many bullshit titles and made-up distinctions about terms like programmer, computer scientist, infosec rockstar, cloud engineer, cloud evangelist, machine learning guru, 10x developer, devops thoughtlord, and so on.
Name:
Anonymous2018-05-31 22:31
>>5 Programmers are the same as developers, Computer Scientists however are not the same as either.
Name:
Anonymous2018-05-31 22:38
>>6 Computer scientists who are not developers are useless theorists stuck in the ivory tower of academia.
One word: One word, THE RELUCTANT RULE OF PHILOSOPHERS, thread over. One word, THE REPEATING OF HISTORY AS FARCE, thread over. One word, THE FORCED IDENTATION OF CODE, thread over. One word, THE BENIGN INDIFFERENCE OF THE UNIVERSE, thread over.
I used to have a zillion of these, which I'd just make up for each book or chapter I'd read.
I used to have a zillion of these, which I'd just make up for each book or chapter I'd read.
cute
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-01 2:15
What would society look like if popular CS figures ruled?
Imagine a society ruled by old-school freetards like Eric S. Raymond or Richard Stallman.
Or compare that to what it'd be like if we had modern tech elites in charge instead -- people who are pro-proprietary, pro-data mining, like Zuckerberg.
A good technocracy would involve people like RMS, who care more about morals and freedom -- as opposed to business-oriented people like Bezos, Gates, Zuckerberg, and so on.
I often sign as Archer when I need to, but I'm not purely Archer. It is possible to reach one power through another, such as Brute through Changer, but there are some that are more "pure" and fundamental than others, without which one does not get very far.
Breaker breaks physics or the usual rules, and it's quite a power. You can reach it with Tinkering or Thinking, just as other technological / martial advances can be achieved with these two. The difference between Tinkering and Thinking is that Tinkering requires experimentation, and Thinking is more to do with pure logic, mathematics and sometimes "common sense".
Trump knows how to mess with powers, nullify or potentialize the powers of others. Some psychological intuition is necessary.
>>22,23,24 No. My RPG system is built on synergy and constructible multi-component spells, not on char classes. The wiki is currently disabled, because i don't want to give the videogame industry any advantages on exploiting this mechanic.
What's the difference between a psychic palm reading and an economic forecast?
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-06 4:42
>>35 one uses math that would make the average codenigger’s head explode
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-06 4:43
codePoC*
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-08 15:01
>>8 Most politicians, especially in bongland, are trained in philosophy and economics ('PPE')
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-08 17:12
s/bonglang/britbongistan;
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-08 22:07
>>35 Your comparison is bad because divination is actually real and effective. The bad part is that in order to get any skill in it you will inevitably stop having selfish and greedy thoughts, once you start seeing the whole. That's why true divinators, or divine men, are usually so rare, and not to be bought.
