>>4That's not the aim of Free software. Free software movement does not claim its aims to have 'well audited code', nor to be more reliable or secure. It simply aims for freedom, and to remove subjugation of users by developers. The disclosure of source is at the very least a gesture, and acts as a mere prerequisite for the freedom to run a program as you wish for any purpose.
I believe it's 'open source' faggots that spread this myth.