Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Advice to Intel: Make x86 great again

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2018-07-28 5:54

https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/3036660/intel-10nm-cannon-lake-processors-delayed-again-until-late-2019

Quit fucking around with the ME, DRM, security, diversity bullshit, web "developers", UEFI, process shrinks, etc. and get back to finishing iDDR and E64, optimising REP/REPNZ/REPZ and the other instructions, and release something worth buying again. Clownlake is long overdue.

Name: Anonymous 2018-08-13 10:29

https://github.com/xoreaxeaxeax/rosenbridge

x86 was never great

Name: Anonymous 2018-08-13 11:30

>>41
Only affects VIA CPUs. Who cares?

Name: Anonymous 2018-08-13 11:35

>>42
first we have meltdown and spectre which should have affected only intel but also affected amd. then we have this which only affects via. what next? the problem is that x86 is a bloated, overly complicated, unauditable mess of legacy features, hidden features, patent-protected features, additional processors running additional OSes and plenty of other shit.

Name: Anonymous 2018-08-13 11:37

advice to /prague/: make my dubs checked again

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2018-08-13 11:44

>>41
Took a decade for someone to discover something already documented in the datasheet and spin it as a "vulnerability". Shows just how idiotic these "security" people are.

Name: Anonymous 2018-08-13 11:46

>>45
wait, there's a documented feature that allowed execution as ring 0 from ring 3? truly amazing hardware design!

Name: Anonymous 2018-08-13 11:47

You are mission: implement a x86 emulator that only supports mov.

Name: Anonymous 2018-08-13 11:54

>>47
the same guy who wrote the exploit in >>41 actually made a C compiler that emits only movs. it actually works

Name: Anonymous 2018-08-13 16:38

>>48
Thats because move in x86 is really versatile.
https://github.com/xoreaxeaxeax/movfuscator

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2018-08-14 11:39

>>46
It's a feature, not a bug. Cumb dunt.

Name: Anonymous 2018-08-14 17:43

>>50
I haven't heard that one in years.

Name: Anonymous 2018-08-16 6:41

>>50
it's a feature to have security features and then a built-in backdoor which bypasses them. your're are truly a genius, C*dder!

Name: Anonymous 2018-10-12 7:10

>>52
Sadly, this entire thread confirms Cudder, or this imposter, is an Intel employee throughout.
The better question would be, what libre CISC designs can we build upon.
None of us trust Intel Aviv with our bodies, so what architectures are there to play with?

Name: Anonymous 2018-10-12 22:13

It's a backdoor 'feature' for sure, it's stated as such in the patent filings.

See the 2014 god mode defcon vid.

Name: Anonymous 2018-10-14 13:36

>>53
Why CISC? VLIW is the future.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode + RSS -