>>4 you like invalid code that doesn't make sense?
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-04 20:30
>>5 Code is for humans to understand first and for computers to execute second. This is an obvious humourous code not meant tobe executed, so the latter does not apply, and if someone with basic knowledge of CSS claims they do not understand the intent, they are being obtuse.
Name:
ironylord2018-09-04 20:38
>>6 but they could have just as easily used an ID or class selector in such a way that it actually makes sense
Example: .black { lives: matter; } or #black { lives: matter; } those are both perfectly valid, but a hex representation of a color that doesn't correspond to an element or class or ID is not
they could've even used !important or a z-index or something to be more clever, instead of this ``I'm pretending to know about web development even though I have no idea bout it'' bullshit
I bet the person wearing that shirt doesn't even know CSS
Name:
ironylord2018-09-04 20:41
well I mean it's technically not valid because I don't know of any property called ``lives'' but you get the idea
it's still more correct that using a fucking hex code as a selector
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-04 21:20
Why would #black be valid but #000000 not be? This must be a really shitty language.
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-04 21:24
>>9 because #black is an ID selector for a user-defined class and they were doing a hex representation of a color
you can give an HTML element something like class="whatever" and then change it with a CSS selector of #whatever {}
and yeah, CSS is a shitty language, and it's not turing complete, so it can't be compared to turing complete languages
it's just layout and animation
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-04 21:28
I meant ID, not class, but you know what I meant
but they should have used a class selector because IDs are for unique thins only, and wouldn't a race be a lot of people, hence non-unique? unless you want to only include one person
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-04 23:06
this is the hallmark of autism, not being able to tell that this is a metaphor.
black is a selector. lives is a property. matter is the state assigned to that property.
what would you have preferred? (setq stuff-that-matters (cons ‘black-lives ‘stuff-that-matters))
A selector that actually works instead of a shitty hex color joke. Plus, I haven't seen any afro-american who would steal all the light, they usually reflect enough to look brown. So she needs a class anyway, unless it's only the lives of aphotic 0% afro-creaturas that matter.
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-05 11:37
A selector that actually works instead of a shitty hex color joke.
Uncaught SyntaxError: Invalid or unexpected token “ Uncaught SyntaxError: Invalid or unexpected token ” Uncaught TypeError: document.getElementByTagName is not a function
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-05 18:30
I've heard that people use preprocessors for CSS nowadays. Sass comes up a lot. Is it worth using? I have no problem with using CSS3 by itself. What's the point in learning a preprocessor?
Is it one of those ``spend time learning this additional tool and it'll make things easier'' gimmicks? Like I once learned a templating engine for HTML that was actually more complicated than HTML itself! Is that what Sass is? It's like ``why learn CSS when you can use Sass'' but I already know CSS so why even bother?
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-05 18:31
I said ``templating engine'' but I really mean a preprocessor-type thing that turned some weird pseudocode into HTML. I think they called it up a markup language. Except HTML is already a markup language, so it was markup for markup. Fucking stupid, redundant idiocy. I don't know if Sass is the CSS equivalent for that, but it might be.
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-05 18:52
>>20 Same. But it has features CSS doesn't have like variables, functions, namespace nesting, etc. Most people don't need all this, but I guess some """web 3.0""" sites feel the need to use it.
Name:
Anonymous2018-09-11 3:55
>>20 Sass reduces some of the retarded repetition and verbosity that vanilla CSS forces on the author. WARNING: ignore its ``advanced`` features as they are only used by perverts.
