Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

UwU

Name: Anonymous 2018-12-25 20:36

Front page poast on H*ckernews, which is full of degenerates and weebs after all:

https://react-kawaii.now.sh/

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-10 9:08

>>15
Also known as functions from types to types
Those are type constructors.

You can't have Maybe List in OCaml
What do you mean?

nor can you have typeclasses.
Typeclasses are anti-modular. OCaml has functors which can implement what typeclasses do just as well, if a bit heavy on syntax. In a few years we'll have modular implicits to fix the syntax too, but even now there's syntax extensions for do notation that let you plug in you're own monad.

OCaml also has about half a dozen standard libraries. If you want to anally deform your program into dead dog code using monades you can easily do that.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List