Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

UwU

Name: Anonymous 2018-12-25 20:36

Front page poast on H*ckernews, which is full of degenerates and weebs after all:

https://react-kawaii.now.sh/

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-14 9:46

>>40
are these written in common lisp?

but yeah you got me

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-15 19:25

wow, sbcl now officially supports windows.
we truly live in the future.

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-16 9:43

>>42 Windows is basically a Linux port at this point, with Azure & used code & donations

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-16 10:05

but my dubs are portable between OSes

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-18 19:13

>>38
super low-level stuff like microcontrolles in thermostat isn't significantly faster to write in C, and even then you need non-standard stuff like inline assembly which makes it non-portable

For maintenance of old 4-16 bit designs, this is true. However, the market for new designs using such chips shrinks every year. A Cortex M0 can be had rather cheaply now, and you'd be a fool to use nothing but asm on one of those.

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-20 8:50

>>1
Finish you're game.

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-20 9:57

>>46
this 100% isn't the hamster destroyer

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-20 11:31

I summon the burning dead hamster to engulf the world in pain!

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-20 14:03

🐹🔥

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-21 7:08

>>45
M0 is still more expensive than an AVR-based micro (ATMega, ATTiny etc.) and while it might be a small difference for you when designing a personal anus-haxing machine, it adds up when making a million of them for a haxed anus factory.

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-21 12:02

>>50
My point is that there aren't as many new designs for cheap anus haxxing machines as there used to be. The existing ones hax anii with great efficiency, leaving little room for improvement.

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-21 12:08

>>51
this assumes that anus-haxing is a computationally hard problem, which it isn't. your're are anus won't be haxed more efficitently with a 32-bit micro

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-21 12:15

>>50,51
Also, if you're really interested in a cheap micro the AVR is not all the hobbyist community makes it to be. For truly high volumes you can go far with one of the countless 8051 derivatives.

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-22 9:29

>>52
The programmer who uses the 32 bit micro can use a high level language, and thus takes less time and costs less money to write the anus haxxing code. So it is more efficient, at least until need build millions of anus haxxing devices.

The number of anii that must be haxxed before using an 8 bit micro will save money gets smaller every year. Worse, people keep asking for new features like Bluetooth anus haxxing notifications on their bug^Hsmartphones, and an 8 bit just isn't up to that.

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-22 9:30

>>54
Worse, people keep asking for new features like Bluetooth anus haxxing notifications
anus, we're talking about industrial scale, not IoShit. also check'em

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-24 7:31

>>55
>industrial scale

So what, EPC anus haxxing beacons? It's not just consumers asking for this crap.

Though you could totally do EPC on an 8 bit...

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-24 7:34

could we talk about weeb node js shit and not microcontrollers please

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-24 7:37

>>56
8-bit micros controlling the fully automated anus-haxing assembly lines. anus-haxing ladder language programs for the anus-haxing PLCs. boomer mechanical engineers designing anus-haxing widgets of different shapes and sizes

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-24 7:42

>>57
this is now an anus haxing thread

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-24 8:58

https://www.lowjs.org/ >>57 Node.js is not incompatible with micro

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-24 9:05

>>58
Cost is a non issue for industrial control systems. Businesses sink millions into their equipment; they do not give a shit if the PLC attached to their anus haxxinator adds a couple thousand dollars. They do, however, care very much if a cheap control unit malfunctions and damages equipment or injures the operator.

Control systems are built the way they are because they are subject to hard real time constraints, solutions to those constraints are well known, predate mass market consumer microprocessor systems, and have limited applicability to the latter.

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-24 9:12

>>61
Case in point: look at how modern electronic test equipment is built. High capital cost, low volumes, but no meaningful real time requirement for anything but the lowest level A/D control. The result? Your $40,000 oscilloscope has a $400 Wintel PC on a board inside the chassis.

Name: Anonymous 2019-01-26 12:34

>>62
Or a game boy: https://twitter.com/JanHenrikH/status/910754596422868992
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode + RSS -