Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

The Power of Deep Learning

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-16 9:20

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-16 9:30

I thought that it's an AI than generates RedCream poastings.

Name: Deeper Learning 2019-02-16 12:57

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-16 13:10

>>3
It does not work.

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-18 7:09

Name: AI Believer 2019-02-18 20:53

Make love, not death.

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-18 21:20

>>5
One of them is fucking holo.

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-19 7:31

>>5
Tim Soret
what's wit /prog/ and people who don't make their're are games?

also, he's being a retard here. contemporary machine learning will not replace all human creativity as it can only imitate without understanding. it can mutate inputs to create similar images or music, but it will not create anything more interesting than that. this is just automated imitation. it will also fail at anything that requires a more complex context - it won't write a good book, for example. even going be the theme of video game music he mentions - if you input soundtrack to FF6 it will end up with things that kind of sound like music from FF6, but it will be far less structured and without supervision it won't be able to put it within the game's context (e.g. it won't understand that the parts that sound like opera need to go in the opera scene, or how to connect different movements of the symphonic piece to different phases of the final boss fight)

AI might be able to do things like that in the future, but we're not yet there

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-19 8:06

>>8
Still smarter than a Russian.

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-19 8:09

>>9
yeah, but that's not a big achievement. an average dog is smarter than a Russian

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-19 8:10

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-19 18:07

https://imgur.com/a/EQZdNF5

Interesting, but not revolutionary. Nowhere near the level of replacing human work.
How long till this ``Deep Neural Networks'' stuff becomes just another AI winter?

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-19 18:25

>>12
What about artificial neural networks being able to beat top Starcraft players? Obviously Starcraft is one of the simpler rock-paper-scissors RTSes (no terraforming or any really complex moves), but still it is already impossible for human player to beat a bot. While years before it was considered impossible to write good AI for games like Starcraft.

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-19 18:28

>>13
For example, even the most complex scripted AI (huge many thousands of sloc codebase) was easily beatable by human players https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-S1CkfzEHSU

So there is an obvious huge progress. Now it is AI which needs handicap, not players.

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-20 17:12

https://d2ph5fj80uercy.cloudfront.net/03/cat2960.jpg <==What neural network thinks is cat

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-20 18:42

>>15
Cat++

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-20 19:06

>>8
what's wit /prog/ and people who don't make their're are games?
Funding.
>[Tim Soret's ignorance]
https://invidio.us/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU
https://invidio.us/watch?v=WSKi8HfcxEk
https://invidio.us/watch?v=GHc63Xgc0-8
tl;dw
Robots are being "creative", they already write novels, music, news articles, draw, etc..
I'm not the only one that believes we'll be obsolete, people are consuming 3D VR games and anime (most don't know it's all cel shaded).
Set up a robot to read the work an art studio does for a year working on many things, and you have seeds to work with.
I already believe Kadokawa or Disney is working on this to keep costs low.

No more questions?

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-21 7:37

>>17
they already write novels,
have you read any novel (or movie script or something like that) written by AI? if not, spoiler alert: their're are not very good
music,
neural networks/deep learning is an anus backwards approach to computer-generated music. algorithmic composition based on basic musicological rules about melody, harmony and structure tends to sound much better than 'AI' shit.
news articles
you mean SEO spam?

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-21 15:00

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-21 19:22

Hax my anus

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-22 6:42

>>18
Not yet,true,no actual news distilled and verbosed preferring former.
Doesn't matter, people will buy garbage because it comes from garbage.
We're already being outplaced by robots.

Name: Anonymous 2019-02-22 7:09

dubs learning

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-05 9:01

I could literally make a Bravely Default procedural generative RPG with this shit:
https://dena.com/intl/anime-generation/
I'm still denying >>18
We are being obsolesced.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-05 9:03

>>23
then do it, wrove me prong.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-05 9:16

>>24
That'll be 31880.977683315625 XMR to cover electricity, food, rent, labour, taxes, licences, etc..
Got your session key ready?

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-05 9:18

>>25
no action!

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-05 9:23

>>26
No funds. I can't #walkaway like you did on taxpayer money.
Even this game is regulated as fuck:
https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/EDGE
I'm a bloody Samsung, I can't program on Android 8!

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-05 9:25

>>27
was this post generated by neural network? if it was, it fails my turing test

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-05 9:30

>>28
Likely. Either way: if I can pay 1 programmer to seed the few rules the RPG should and shouldn't do, I could replicate EA's every iteration of some sports game.
Obsolescing Square & Game freak is only a few seeds away.
You read about the seedless deep fake models?

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-05 9:45

I just realized >>18 is denying NETHACK ever existed, and front-ending >>23 like every Dwarf Fortress FE that has ever existed "is not within the realms of an AI proceduring".
Truly ignorant if they've never studied procedure generation.
The question is how to improve it, so it competes iterations of itself from demands, thus ever making itself fit with what people desire.

So like picrew, but better.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-05 11:02

>>30
Nethack and DF don't use neural networks. their're are also not generated by AI - those are games made by actual people, just using some random content. and it's not like their're are procedural algorithm could competely replace actual designers - it's trivial to create a dungeon map that Nethack's RNG would not be able to create

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-05 17:35

>>23
Nice. But it works only with highly standardized media, such as anime. And you still need enough examples to train a neural network. I.e. it is not an artist replacement, but just another tool among brushes available to artist. In practice it will mean higher education requirement for artists, because as soon as people get accustomed to higher quality free rotating camera in anime, there is no going back, and all artists will have to study ANN basics. But yeah, all artists ideally want to feed in their concept art, and get out a living world.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-05 23:06

the power of my dubs

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-06 1:14

>>31,32
seed enough corporate spyware and artists' processes, and you could make billions. You think Disney, Kadokawa, and Warner won't cut off their costliest process?
Why do you think Windows 10 is free? For your convince?

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-06 9:35

>>34
Windows 10 is free, because Microsoft changed their business model from selling good software to providing social network platform. They are now in this grand competition with Google and Facebook. It also means Windows is a walled garden crap now.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-07 8:54

>>35
Is that why Microsoft hired all the AI devs?

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-07 10:30

>>36
AI can be used for anything, from self driving cars and nanorobots to making market predictions.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-07 10:39

>>37
but can it HAX MY ANUS?

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-08 3:29

>>37
How about replace the entire labour force that uses it's operating system?

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-08 8:46

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-08 8:59

>>40
wow, compositing random images of people's faces. how revolutionary, this will surely replace all workforce and also their're are completely indistinguishable from humans, it's not like you can easily see that their're are fake

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-08 9:18

>>41
R U O K ?
If it's easy to have AI read&spyware everything you do, why is hard to believe you won't be replaced?
It's already happening, refusing to believe it is another matter.

There's also singles around your area that want you.

Also vote #YangGang2020!
http://eterni.me/
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/eterni-life-after-death-ai
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/imacros-for-firefox/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/kantu/

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-08 9:25

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-08 9:31

deeply learn my dubs

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-09 18:35

>>42
Yang had a chance to free the masses from slavery with a convincing premise but he blew it by going for the sci-fi "AI will take our jobs" meme.

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-09 21:19

>>45
But AIs are taking our jobs, don't you see the memes being created by a marketing team in the Democratic party? Something Obama didn't do, esp. in websites like reddit, or that Facebook site that had to confess to Congress about the Cambridge Analytics showing how the Democratic party used websites to campaign.

Oh wait, I'm providing >>18 right. Never mind, oh look, the masses want AIs to take over! Vote for taxed deducted UBIs!

#Taxation is not #Theft!

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-09 23:45

>>42,45-46
Get out of my thread

Name: Anonymous 2019-03-10 3:23

/kick 47

Name: Anonymous 2020-06-29 13:53

>>1

Huawei's initiatives, including Virtual AI Academy, invest in local talent to build a stronger tech ecosystem for all.

Huawei AI Academy : http://e.huawei.com/en/talent

Huawei AI Lab : http://ailab-apac.huawei.com

Name: Anonymous 2020-06-29 14:05

>>49
Will they provide employees with hazmat suits from the upcoming covid20?
What about G5 waves inducing cancer?

Name: Anonymous 2020-06-29 14:57

>>50
What about G4 waves inducing cancer? Only thing G5 might be worse for is skin cancer.

Name: Anonymous 2020-06-29 15:07

>>51
G4 is in use for some time, yet no surge of cancer cases.

G5 first needs to be tested on Chinese insects, and only then introduced in civilized countries.

Name: Anonymous 2020-06-29 16:07

>>52
G4 is in use for some time, yet no surge of cancer cases.
The possibility of it causing cancer is still there.

G5 first needs to be tested on Chinese insects, and only then introduced in civilized countries.
I doubt they'd make it known if it does causes it even more than G4.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List