>>48The entire point of comma-based interjections is that you can remove them and still have the sentence make sense. Then you can extrapolate from the context of the sentence sans interjections exactly what the interjections are doing in the sentence, whether it be highlighting, underlining, reinforcing, or any number of other functions we use comma-based interjections for in written English. In this case the interjections (the two words between commas excluding any joining words that may happen to be between commas) are commenting on the sheer irony of
>>45's post.